Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was performed between 2nd October 1996 and 28th October 1996
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affcet the quality of relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of Inspection: 22/01/96 Date of signature: 27/02/96
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of :Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(Z)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)
EC Number:
700-174-4
Cas Number:
1029600-34-7
Molecular formula:
See structure.
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of :Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(Z)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of : Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(Z)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of : Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(Z)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-(2-methylbutan-2-yl)-3-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-) Sodium or ammonium [1-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO][3-{(E)-[2-(hydroxy-kO)-5-nitrophenyl]diazenyl}naphthalen-2-olato(2-)-kO]chromate(1-)
Details on test material:
Sponsor's identification: VALIFAST BLACK 3810
Chemical name: Colour Index Solvent Black 29
Batch number: X-10543
Description: Black powder
Date received: 3 June 1996
Storage Conditions: Room temperature

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Th strains were obtained from the University of California at Berkeley on culture discs and were stored at -196 degrees in a liquid nitrogen freezer.
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Preliminary study 50 to 5000 µg/plate
experiment 1: 50 to 5000µg/plate
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
dimethyl sulphoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
used TA100 and TA1535
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
dimethyl sulphoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
used for TA1537
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
dimethyl sulphoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Remarks:
Used for TA 98
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
dimethyl sulphoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
Remarks:
used for TA 1538
Evaluation criteria:
For a substance to be considered positive in this test system, it should have induced a dose related and statistically significant increase in mutation rate in one or more strains of bacteria in the presence and/or absence of the S9 microsomal enzymes in both experiments at sub-toxic dose levels. In the event of the two experiments giving conflicting or equivocal results, a third experiment may be performed to confirm the correct response. All data are statistically analysed using the methods recommended by the UKEMS and normally Dunnetts method of linear regression is used to evaluate the result. To be considered negative the number of induced revertants compared to spontaneous revertants should be less than twofold at each dose level employed, the intervals of which should be between two and five fold and extend to the limits imposed by toxicity, solubility or up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate. In this case the limiting factor was the maximum recommended use.
Statistics:
All data are statistically analysed using the methods recommended by the UKEMS and Dunnetts method of linear regression is used to evaluate the result

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Preliminary study:
The test material was non-toxic to the strain of Salmonella used (TA 100)
Remarks on result:
other: strain/cell type: bacterial/microsome test system
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Please see attached material for tables (1 -5)

The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn at any of the dose levels to any of the strains of the Salmonella tested. The tested material was, therefore tested up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate respectively, this did not interfere with the scoring of revertant colonies.

A dose-related, statistically significant and reproducible increase in revertant colony frequency was observed for the majority of bacterial tester strains both with and without metabolic activation. The test material was therefore considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test.

All the positive control chemcials used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies and the actviity of the S9 fraction was found to be satisfactory.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive

The test material was considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test
Executive summary:

Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100 were treated with suspensions of the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at 5 dose levels, in triplicate both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co factors). The dose range in the preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5,000 µg/plate in the first experiment. The first experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The method used confirms with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Protocol No. 471 and also with Method B14 in Commission Directive 92/69/EEC.

The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates produced counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All the positive controls used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without the metabolising system.

The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn at any of the dose levels to any of the strains of the Salmonella tested. The tested material was, therefore tested up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 µg/plate respectively, this did not interfere with the scoring of revertant colonies.

A dose-related, statistically significant and reproducible increase in revertant colony frequency was observed for the majority of bacterial tester strains both with and without metabolic activation. The test material was therefore considered to be mutagenic under the conditions of the test.