Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 September 2016 - 21 September 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
Version / remarks:
2004
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - HPLC Method)
Version / remarks:
2008
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
4.45
Temp.:
22.7 °C
pH:
ca. 7
Remarks on result:
other: No pH value was measured for this mobile phase, because it is neutral. The test item does not have functional groups with influence on the pH value of the mobile phase.
Details on results:
The column temperature range was 22.4 to 22.9°C (must be ± 1°C), The signal-to-noise ratio for the void time marker, reference items and the test item was > 3. The correlation coefficient r was 0.9955 for the first calibration and was 0.9953 for the second calibration (must be > 0.9). The value of log Pow derived from repeated measurements made under identical conditions and using the same set of reference items fell within a range of ± 0.1 log units. Therefore, all validity criteria were met.

Table 1. Calibration data of the reference items

Reference item   log Pow  1st calibration        2nd calibration      
    tr1 (min )  k  log k  tr2 (min)  k  log k
 Anisole  2.1  2.498  4.09  0.612  2.508  4.11  0.614
 Allyl phenyl ether  2.9  3.752  6.64  0.822  3.769  6.68  0.825
 Ethylbenzene  3.2  5.278  9.75  0.989  5.299  9.79  0.991
 Isopropylbenzene  3.7  7.071  13.4  1.13  7.104  13.5  1.13
 n-Butylbenzene  4.6  12.127  23.7  1.37  12.175  23.8  1.38
 Fluoranthene  5.1  14.667

 28.9

 1.46

 14.710

 29.0

 1.46

 Triphenylamine  5.7  21.954  43.7  1.64 22.067  43.9  1.64

tr1 = retention time, 1st injection

tr2 = retention time, 2nd injection

k = capacity factor

Table 2. Retention times, capacity factors and partition coefficients for the test item

 Signal  1  2
 Area  70.8  29.2
 Replicate 1      
 tr (min)  9.940  11.204
 k  19.2  21.8
 log k  1.28  1.34
 Replicate 2      
 tr (min)  9.943  11.206
 k  19.3  21.8
 log k  1.29  1.34
 Mean      
 tr (min)  9.942  11.205
 k  19.3  21.8
 log k  1.29  1.34
 log Pow (95% CI)      
 1st calibration  4.40 ± 0.05 (4.26 - 4.54)  4.58 ± 0.06 (4.43 - 4.73)
 2nd calibration  4.39 ± 0.06 (4.25 - 4.54)  4.57 ± 0.06 (4.42 - 4.72)
 Mean  4.40  4.57
 Weighted average log Pow  4.45

tr = retention time

k = capacity factor

CI = confidence interval

Conclusions:
The weighted average log Pow of the test item was determined to be 4.45 using the HPLC method.
Executive summary:

The weighted average log Pow of the test item was determined to be 4.45 using the HPLC method. The study is considered reliable without restriction (Klimisch 1) as it was performed according to guidelines OECD 117 and EU A.8, and was GLP-compliant.

Description of key information

The weighted average log Pow of the test item was determined to be 4.45 using the HPLC method.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
4.45
at the temperature of:
22.7 °C

Additional information

The study is considered reliable without restriction (Klimisch 1) as it was performed according to guidelines OECD 117 and EU A.8, and was GLP-compliant (2017). The weighted average log Pow of the test item was determined using the HPLC method.