Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2005
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[3-methoxycarbonyl-4-[6-(4-prop-2-enoyloxybutoxycarbonyloxy)naphthalene-2-carbonyl]oxy-phenyl] 6-(4-prop-2-enoyloxybutoxycarbonyloxy)naphthalene-2-carboxylate
Cas Number:
914918-26-6
Molecular formula:
C46H40O16
IUPAC Name:
[3-methoxycarbonyl-4-[6-(4-prop-2-enoyloxybutoxycarbonyloxy)naphthalene-2-carbonyl]oxy-phenyl] 6-(4-prop-2-enoyloxybutoxycarbonyloxy)naphthalene-2-carboxylate

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS- Source: RCC Ltd Laboratory Animal Services, Wölferstrasse 4, CH-4414 Füllinsdorf, Switzerland- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks- Fasting period before study: Feed was withdrawn from the animals at least 16 hours before administration, but water was available ad libitum- Housing: singly- Diet: ad libitum- Water: ad libitum- Acclimation period: 5 daysENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3- Humidity (%): 30-70- Air changes (per hr): 10 - Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Remarks:
0.5 %
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE- Concentration in vehicle: 20 g/100 mL- Amount of vehicle: 10 mL/ kg bw- Justification for choice of vehicle: A good homogeneity in water could not be guaranteed, because the test item preparation was a suspension. Therefore a 0.5 % solution of CMC in deionized water was applicable. MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 2000 mg/kg bwCLASS METHOD- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: requested by the sponsor, no acute toxiicty expected up to 2000 mg/kg bw
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6 females
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days - Body weight determination: Individual body weights shortly before administration (day 0), weekly thereafter and at the end of the study.- Signs and symptoms: Recording of signs and symptoms several times on the day of administration, at least once each workday for the individual animals; these records are maintained with the raw data.- Mortality: A check for any dead or moribund animal was made twice each workday and once on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays.- Pathology: Necropsy with gross-pathology examination on the last day of the observation period after killing by CO2-inhalation.- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, gross pathology

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
No clinical signs were observed during clinical examination.
Body weight:
The mean body weight increased within the normal range throughout the study period.
Gross pathology:
There were no macroscopic pathological findings in the animals sacrificed at the end of the observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
practically nontoxic
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU