Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 281-506-0 | CAS number: 83968-28-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
Skin irritation study was carried out on mammals to determine the irritation potency of Basic Violet 1.Basic Violet 1 did not cause any dermal irritation.
Eye irritation:
Basic Violet 1 eye irritation test result for New Zealand white rabbits was observed. Basic Violet 1 was observed as severe irritating substance.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: data from peer reviewed journals
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To determine the skin irritation potential of Basic Violet 1
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- other: mammals
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
- Type of coverage:
- other: no data
- Preparation of test site:
- other: no data
- Amount / concentration applied:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- no data
- Observation period:
- no data
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks on result:
- other: no signs of irritation observed
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Skin irritation study was carried out on mammals to determine the irritation potency of Basic Violet 1.
Basic Violet 1 did not cause any dermal irritation. - Executive summary:
Skin irritation study was carried out on mammals to determine the irritation potency of Basic Violet 1.Basic Violet 1 did not cause any dermal irritation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD guideline
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To evaluate the potential for ocular irritation of the test article C.I. Basic Violet 1 when administered to New Zealand white rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Sgarlat"s Rabbitry, Harveys Lake
- Age at study initiation: Adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2.28 -2.77 kg
- Fasting period before study: No data available.
- Housing: The rabbits were individually housed in wire mesh bottom cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): NIH 09 Rabbit Ration (Zeigler Brothers, Gardners, PA) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 5 days
Or Test Tissue- Not applicable.
- Source:
- Type:
- Acclimation :
- Housing conditions:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
- Humidity (%):
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour dark /12 hrs light - Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- other: the other eye serves as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1,24,48 and 4th day
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 30 seconds
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 9 animals
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): 3 rabbits' eyes were irrigated
with lukewarm tap water
- Time after start of exposure: 30-seconds after instillation for approximately one minute.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Lesions. - Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1,24,48 hours and 4day
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: Severe Irritation was observed before and after washing of eyes.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Severe Irritation
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Basic Violet 1 eye irritation test result for New Zealand white rabbits was observed. Basic Violet 1 was observed as severe irritating substance.
- Executive summary:
Eye irritation effect ofBasic Violet 1 was observed in NewZealand white rabbits. 9NewZealand white rabbits were taken for the test. An amount of 0.1 g of the test article was instilled into one eye of each rabbit and other eye served as control. The treated eyes of six animals remained unwashed and three rabbits' eyes were irrigated with lukewarm tap water 30-seconds after instillation for approximately one minute. The grade of ocular reaction for each animal recorded at 1, 24. 48 and 72 hours and at 4thday post instillation using the Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Lesions. In six rabbits Eyes were not irrigated after test article instillation. While in 3 rabbits Eyes were irrigated 30seconds after test article instillation. Severe irritations were observed in all 9 rabbit before and after washing of eyes. Therefore it can be concluded that the test substance Basic Violet 1 was observed to be severe irritating in New Zealand white rabbits. Hence this substance can be classified as eye irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
Skin irritation test by (Catherine Diamanteet.al, 2009) with target was observed. Skin irritation study was carried out on mammals to determine the irritation potency of Basic Violet 1.Basic Violet 1 did not cause any dermal irritation.
In other study by (ACToR database,2011) with similar substance (91-66-7) was observed . In the skin irritation study in rabbit N,N-diethylaniline was reported as moderately irritating to the skin in rabbit. However, this was not considered sufficient for classifying N,N-diethyl aniline as a skin irritant.
In other study by (Schreiber, G,1982) with similar substance (91-66-7) was observed. In the skin irritation study in rabbit N,N-diethylaniline was reported as slightly irritating to the skin in rabbit. However, this was not considered sufficient for classifying N,N-diethylaniline as a skin irritant.
In other study by (Smyth, H.F., et al., 1962) with similar substance (121-69-7) was observed. Primary skin irritation was tested in five albino rabbits. 0.1 mL of undiluted N,N- dimethylaniline was applied to uncovered clipped skin. The resulting reaction scored a 3 with grade 2 indicating the least visible capillary injection and grade 6 indicating necrosis. However, this score was not sufficient enough for classification of N,N- dimethylaniline.
In other study by (IUCLID Dataset. European Chemicals Bureau, Feb. 2000.) With similar substance (121-69-7) was observed. The application of 100 mg of 0.6% N,N-dimethylaniline in petrolatum for 24 hours did not cause irritation in volunteers.
In an in vitro skin irritation test,the test article, Formaldehyde, reaction products with N,N-dimethylbenzenamine and N-methylbenzenamine, oxidized, hydrochlorides, was found to be incompatible with the test due to extreme MTT auto-reduction or coloration causing extreme variations in viability data that could not be corrected for. Thus, no data provided as the test article Formaldehyde, reaction products with N,N-dimethylbenzenamine and N-methylbenzenamine, oxidized, hydrochlorides (CAS No.- 83968-28-9) was deemed incompatible with the assay.
On the basis of available information for the target as well as read across substance and applying weight of evidence approach, the test substance can be considered as not irritating to the skin.
Eye irritation:
Eye irritation effect ofBasic Violet 1 was observed in NewZealand white rabbits. 9NewZealand white rabbits were taken for the test. An amount of 0.1 g of the test article was instilled into one eye of each rabbit and other eye served as control. The treated eyes of six animals remained unwashed and three rabbits' eyes were irrigated with lukewarm tap water 30-seconds after instillation for approximately one minute. The grade of ocular reaction for each animal recorded at 1, 24. 48 and 72 hours and at 4thday post instillation using the Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Lesions. In six rabbits Eyes were not irrigated after test article instillation. While in 3 rabbits Eyes were irrigated 30seconds after test article instillation. Severe irritations were observed in all 9 rabbit before and after washing of eyes. Therefore it can be concluded that the test substanceBasic Violet 1 was found to be severe irritating in NewZealand white rabbits. Hence test substanceis likely to cause eye damage.
In other study by (Smyth, H.F., et al., 1962) with similar substance (121-69-7) was assessed in rabbit. N, N-dimethylaniline was scored 5 (on a 10-grade ordinal series based on the resulting corneal necrosis) when instilled into rabbit eye, indicating a severe burn from the application of 0.005 ml solution. Hence test substanceis likely to cause eye damage.
In other study by (U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, 2001) with similar substance (121-69-7) was assessed in rabbit. N,N-dimethylaniline caused moderate eye irritation to rabbit when tested at a concentration of 20 mg for 24 hours by a Draize test.Hence test substanceis likely to cause eye damage.
In an in vitro eye irritation test,the test article, Formaldehyde, reaction products with N,N-dimethylbenzenamine and N-methylbenzenamine, oxidized, hydrochlorides (CAS No.- 83968-28-9), was found to be incompatible with the test due to extreme MTT auto-reduction or coloration causing extreme variations in viability data that could not be corrected for. Thus, no data provided as the test article Formaldehyde, reaction products with N,N-dimethylbenzenamine and N-methylbenzenamine, oxidized, hydrochlorides (CAS No.- 83968-28-9) was deemed incompatible with the assay.
On the basis of available information for the target and its read across substance and applying weight of evidence approach, the test substance islikely to cause eye damage.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Skin irritation test by (Catherine Diamanteet.al, 2009) with target was observed. Skin irritation study was carried out on mammals to determine the irritation potency of Basic Violet 1.Basic Violet 1 did not cause any dermal irritation.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Eye irritation effect ofBasic Violet 1 was observed in NewZealand white rabbits. 9NewZealand white rabbits were taken for the test. An amount of 0.1 g of the test article was instilled into one eye of each rabbit and other eye served as control. The treated eyes of six animals remained unwashed and three rabbits' eyes were irrigated with lukewarm tap water 30-seconds after instillation for approximately one minute. The grade of ocular reaction for each animal recorded at 1, 24. 48 and 72 hours and at 4thday post instillation using the Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Lesions. In six rabbits Eyes were not irrigated after test article instillation. While in 3 rabbits Eyes were irrigated 30seconds after test article instillation. Severe irritations were observed in all 9 rabbit before and after washing of eyes. Therefore it can be concluded that the test substanceBasic Violet 1 was found to be severe irritating in NewZealand white rabbits. Hence this substance can be classified as eye irritant.
Effects on eye irritation: highly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance Basic Violet 1 can be classified as non irritant to skin and irritant to eye.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.