Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Testing was conducted between 28 March 2007 and 24 April 2007.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
UK GLP standards (Schedule 1, Good Laboratory Practice Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3106 as amended by SI 2004/0994)).

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Radiolabelling:
no

Study design

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
The buffer solutions were filtered through a 0.2 µm membrane filter to ensure they were sterile before commencement of the test. Also these solutions were subjected to ultrasonication and degassing with nitrogen to minimise dissolved oxygen content.

Preparation of samples:
Sample solutions were prepared at a nominal concentration of 10 g/l in the three buffer solutions.
The test solutions were then split into individual sealed glass vessels for each data point.
The solutions were shielded from light whilst maintained at the test temperature.

Preliminary test:
Sample solutions at pH 4, 7 and 9 were maintained at 50.0 ± 0.5°C for a period of 120 hours.

Analysis of sample solutions:
The sample solutions were taken from the waterbath at various times and the pH of each solution recorded.
The concentration of the sample solution was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Samples:
Duplicate aliquots (A and B) of sample solution were diluted by a factor of 100 using glass double-distilled water.

Standards:
Duplicate standard solutions of test material were prepared in 1% relevant buffer solution in glass double-distilled water at a nominal concentration of 100 mg/l.
Buffers:
Buffer Solution (pH 4)
Components: Potassium hydrogen phthalte
Concentration (mol dm-3): 0.05

Buffer Solution (pH7)
Components: Disodium hydrogen orthophosphate (anhydrous), Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, Sodium chloride
Concentration (mol dm-3): 0.03, 0.02, 0.02

Buffer Solution (pH9)
Components: Disodium tetraborate, Sodium chloride
Concentration (mol dm-3): 0.01, 0.02

The buffer solutions were filtered through a 0.2 µm membrane filter to ensure they were sterile before commencement of the test. Also these solutions were subjected to ultrasonication and degassing with nitrogen to minimise dissolved oxygen content.



Estimation method (if used):
Not used.
Details on test conditions:
Refer to details on sampling and analytical methods.
Duration of testopen allclose all
Duration:
120 h
pH:
4
Initial conc. measured:
10 g/L
Duration:
120 h
pH:
7
Initial conc. measured:
10 g/L
Duration:
120 h
pH:
9
Initial conc. measured:
10 g/L
Number of replicates:
Duplicate aliquots (A and B) of sample solution were diluted by a factor of 100 using glass double-distilled water.
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
no
Statistical methods:
Not specified.

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
The mean peak heights relating to the standard and sample solutions are shown in table 6.2 (please see remarks on results including tables and figures section).
Test performance:
Validation:
The linearity of the detector response with respect to concentration was assessed over the nominal concentration range of 0 to 200 mg/l. This was satisfactory with a correlation coefficient of 1.00 being obtained.
Transformation products:
not specified
Details on hydrolysis and appearance of transformation product(s):
Less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C.
Dissipation DT50 of parent compoundopen allclose all
pH:
4
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Other kinetic parameters:
None.
Details on results:
At pH4, 7 and 9 there was less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C, equivalent to a half-life greater than 1 year at 25°C.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 6.2 - Preliminary test results

Solution

MeanHeight

Standard 100 mg/l

277.173

Standard 100 mg/l

276.847

Initial Sample A, pH 4

275.433

Initial Sample B, pH 4

275.805

2.4 Hour Sample A, pH 4

276.380

2.4 Hour Sample B, pH 4

275.604

Standard 100 mg/l

277.296

Standard 100 mg/l

277.382

Initial Sample A, pH 7

276.798

Initial Sample B, pH 7

273.898

2.4 Hour Sample A, pH 7

275.030

2.4 Hour Sample B, pH 7

276.702

Standard 100 mg/l

276.444

Standard 100 mg/l

276.057

Initial Sample A, pH 9

274.440

Initial Sample B, pH 9

274.769

2.4 Hour Sample A, pH 9

276.263

2.4 Hour Sample B, pH 9

272.834

Standard 101 mg/l

266.033

Standard 102 mg/l

263.087

120 Hour Sample A, pH 4

263.054

120 Hour Sample B, pH 4

262.992

Standard 101 mg/l

261.426

Standard 102 mg/l

264.737

120 Hour Sample A, pH 7

259.836

120 Hour Sample B, pH 7

263.932

Standard 101 mg/l

262.144

Standard 102 mg/l

264.977

120 Hour Sample A, pH 9

264.834

120 Hour Sample B, pH 9

265.466

The test material concentrations at the given time points are shown in the following tables:

Table 6.3        pH 4 at 50.0 ± 0.5ºC

 

Time (Hours)

0

2.4

120

Concentration (g/l)

9.98

9.99

10.1

Log10[concentration (g/l)]

0.999

0.999

1.00

% of initial

-

100

101

Result:             Less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C, equivalent to a half-life greater than 1 year at 25°C.

Table 6.4       pH 7 at 50.0 ± 0.5ºC

 

Time (Hours)

0

2.4

120

Concentration (g/l)

9.95

9.97

10.1

Log10[concentration (g/l)]

0.998

0.999

1.00

% of initial

-

100

101

Result:             Less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C, equivalent to a half-life greater than 1 year at 25°C.

Table 6.5       pH 9 at 50.0 ± 0.5ºC

 

Time (Hours)

0

2.4

120

Concentration (g/l)

9.97

9.96

10.2

Log10[concentration (g/l)]

0.998

0.998

1.01

% of initial

-

100

102

Result:             Less than 10% hydrolysis after 5 days at 50°C, equivalent to a half-life greater than 1 year at 25°C.


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The estimated half-life at 25°C of the test material at pH 4, 7 and 9 is greater than 1 year.
Executive summary:

Abiotic Degradation, Hydrolysis as a Function of pH. 

Assessment of hydrolytic stability was carried out using Method C7 of Commission Directive 92/69/EEC, Method 111 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 13 April 2004. The results are as follows:

pH

Estimated half-life at 25°C

4

>1 year

7

>1 year

9

>1 year