Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 230-303-5 | CAS number: 7023-61-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2007
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 007
- Report date:
- 2007
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Calcium 4-[(5-chloro-4-methyl-2-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxy-2-naphthoate
- EC Number:
- 230-303-5
- EC Name:
- Calcium 4-[(5-chloro-4-methyl-2-sulphonatophenyl)azo]-3-hydroxy-2-naphthoate
- Cas Number:
- 7023-61-2
- Molecular formula:
- C18H13ClN2O6S.Ca
- IUPAC Name:
- calcium 4-[(5-chloro-4-methyl-2-sulfonatophenyl)diazenyl]-3-hydroxy-2-naphthoate
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform
- Details on test material:
- - Identity: TK10334
- Aggregate state at room temperature: solid
- Colour: red
- Stability in solvent: Not indicated by the sponsor
- Storage: room temperature
- Expiration Date: January 30, 2009
- Batch No.: non-surface treated PR48:2 (bill no. 247 2793 396)
- Content: 99.4 %
Test materials used in this dossier are all considered to fall under the definition of nano-materials according to the European Commission Recommendation 2011/696/EU as the synthesis and manufacturing of this pigment always yields particulate material with a fine particle size distribution.
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Identity: TKA10334
- Aggregate state at room temperature: solid
- Colour: red
- Stability in solvent: Not indicated by the sponsor
- Storage: room temperature
- Expiration Date: January 30, 2009
- Batch No.: non-surface treated PR48:2
- Content: 99.4 %
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/beta-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
Exposure 4h, preparation interval 18h, with and without S9-mix: 0.6, 1.3, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 microgramm/plate
Experiment II
Exposure 18h, preparation interval 18h, without S9-mix: 2.8, 6.6, 11.3, 22.5, 45.0, 90, 180 and 360 microgramm/plate
Exposure 28h, preparation interval 28h, without S9-mix: 2.8, 6.6, 11.3, 22.5, 45.0, 90, 180 and 360 microgramm/plate
Exposure 4h, preparation interval 28h, with S9-mix: 0.7, 1.4, 2.8, 6.6, 11.3 and 22.5 microgramm/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- deionized water (suspension)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- other: ethylmethane sulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was suspended in deionised water. The final concentration of deionised water in the culture medium was 10 % (v/v). The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
A pre-test on cell grovth inhibition with 4 hrs and 24 hrs treatment was performed in order to determine the toxicity of the test item (2). Cytotoxicity was determined using concentrations separated by no more than a factor of 2 - ViO. The general experimental conditions in this pre-test were the same as described below for the cytogenetic main experiment. The following method was used: In a quantitative assessment, exponentially growing cell cultures (seeding about 40,000 cells/ slide, with regard to the culture time 48 hrs) were treated with the test item for simulating the conditions of the main experiment. A qualitative evaluation of cell number and cell morphology was made 4 hrs and 24 hrs after start of treatment. The cells were stained 24 hrs after start of treatment. Using a 400-fold microscopic magnification the cells were counted in 10 coordinate defined fields of the slides (2 slides per treatment group). The cell number of the treatment groups is given as % cells in relation to the control. The highest concentration used in the cytogenetic experiments was chosen with regard to the current OECD Guideline for in vitro mammalian cytogenetic tests requesting for the top concentration clear toxicity with reduced cell numbers or mitotic indices below 50 % of control, whichever is the lowest concentration, and/or the occurrence of precipitation. In case of non-toxicity the maximum concentration should be 5 mg/mL, 5 microL/mL or 10 mM, whichever is the lowest, if formulation in an appropriate solvent is possible. With respect to the ability to formulate a homogeneous suspension of TKA 10334, in the pretest, 720 microgramm/mL was applied as top concentration for treatment of the cultures. Test item concentrations between 5.6 and 720 microgramm/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. Precipitation of the test item, after 4 hrs treatment, was observed at 5.6 microgramm/mL and above. Since no relevant toxicity was observed up to the highest applied and/or scorable concentration in the pre-test on toxicity, the test item was tested up to a concentration exhibiting clear test item precipitation as recommended in the OECD Guideline 473. Therefore, for Experiment I, in the absence and the presence of S9 mix, 20 microgramm/mL was chosen as top treatment concentration. Dose selection of Experiment II, was also influenced by test item toxicity. In the range finding experiment, cleariy reduced cell numbers were observed, after 24 hrs exposure, with 180 microgramm/mL and above. Therefore, 360 pg/mL was chosen as top treatment concentration for continuous exposure in the absence of S9 mix. In the presence of S9 mix, 22.5 microgramm/mL was chosen as top treatment concentration with respect to the results obtained in Experiment I. - Evaluation criteria:
- The chromosome aberration test performed in our laboratory is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of structural aberrations found in the solvent controls falls within the range of the laboratory's historical control data range: 0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps.
b) The positive control substances should produce significant increases in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations, which are within the range of the laboratory's historical control data.
A test item is classified as non-clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all scored dose groups is in the range of the laboratory's historical control data range (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps); and/or
- no significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed.
A test item is classified as clastogenic if:
- the number of induced structural chromosome aberrations is not in the range of the laboratory's historical control data range (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps); and
- either a concentration-related or a significant increase of the number of structural chromosome aberrations is observed. Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Fisher's exact test (9) (p < 0.05).
However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. If the criteria mentioned above for the test item are not cleariy met, the classification with regard to the historical data and the biological relevance is discussed and/or a confirmatory experiment is performed. Although the inclusion of the structural chromosome aberrations is the purpose of this study, it is important to include the polyploids and endoreduplications. The following criterion is valid, a test item can be classified as aneugenic if:
- the number of induced numerical aberrations is not in the range of the laboratory's historical control data range (0.0 - 5.2 % polyploid cells). - Statistics:
- not applicable
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- In a range finding pre-test on toxicity, cell numbers were scored 24 hrs after start of treatment as an indicator for cytotoxicity. Concentrations between 5.6 and 720 microgramm/mL were applied. In the absence of S9 mix, no toxic effects were observed up to the highest applied concentration. In the presence of S9 mix, no toxic effects could be observed up to the highest scorable concentration. In contrast, 24 hrs continuous treatment with 180 microgramm/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix induced strong toxic effects.
In the pre-experiment, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed after treatment with 5.6 microgramm/mL and above. No relevant influence of the test item on the pH value or osmolarity was observed (solvent control 277 mOsm, pH 7.5 versus 274 mOsm and pH 7.5 at 720 microgramm/mL).
In Experiment I, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, precipitation of the test item in culture medium was observed after 4 hrs treatment with 10 microgramm/mL. In Experiment II, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, precipitation occurred after treatment 5.6 microgramm/mL and above.
In Experiment I, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, and in Experiment II, in the presence of S9 mix, no toxic effects indicated by reduced mitotic indices and/or reduced cell numbers of below 50 % of control were observed after treatment up to the highest applied test item concentration. In Experiment II, in the absence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest evaluated concentration, being far in excess of test item precipitation. In both experiments, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no statistically significant or biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosome aberrations was observed.
The aberration rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.0 - 3.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps) were close to the range of the solvent control values (0.5 - 2.5 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps) and within the range of the laboratory's historical control data range: 0.0-4.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps. In Experiment II, in the absence of S9 mix, at preparation interval 28 hrs, the number of aberrant cells, excluding gaps, was increased in a dose-related manner. Since all values were cleariy within the range of the laboratory's historical control data range (0.0 - 4.0 % aberrant cells, excluding gaps), this observation has to be regarded as biologically irrelevant.
In both experiments, no biologically relevant increase in the rate of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item (1.4-3.1 %) as compared to the rates of the solvent controls (2.2 - 3.0 %).
In both experiments, either EMS (500 or 900 microgramm/mL) or CPA (1.4 or 2.0 microgramm/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.