Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-704-1 | CAS number: 538-75-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Key study. Method according to OECD 421, GLP study. The NOAEL (based on toxicity) for both parent animals and first generation male/female Sprague Dawley rats was found to be 100 mg/kg bw; the NOAEL (based on reproductive ability) for parent male/female Sprague Dawley rats was found to be 40 mg/kg bw.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 30, - December 10, 2010.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other assay used for intermediate effect derivation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- SPECIFICATION OF STUDY DESIGN WITH JUSTIFICATIONS
- Premating exposure duration for parental (P0) animals: 2 weeks
- Basis for dose level selection: the dose of this study was set based on the results of the 28-day repeated dose toxicity test (See 'Cross-reference'): In this test, animals were dosed with 15, 100 or 500 mg/kg test item for 28 days. In the high dose group, 2 females died, and reduced locomotor activity, supression of body weight gain, increase in liver weight, thickening of the duodenal mucosa, etc. were observed in the remaining animals; no effects were observed at 100 mg/kg bw. In the range finding study, toxicity symptoms such as reduced locomotor activity were also observed in animals dosed with 125 and 250 mg/kg test item for 7 days. Based on the available information, the high dose of this study was set at 250 mg/kg bw, and the spacing factor was 2.5, so the medium dose was 100 mg/kg bw and the low dose 40 mg/kg bw.
- Route of administration: oral, gavage - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material:
- Purity: 99.1%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Refrigerated until use, storage under light shielding (measured temperature 3 to 7 ° C).
- Stability under test conditions: The stability of the test substance was confirmed at Hadano Laboratory before administration (August 30, 2010) and after the end of the administration period (December 10, 2010). - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Remarks:
- Crl: CD (SD), SPF
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Atsugi Breeding Center (Japan).
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: (P) 10 wks.
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 354.0 to 436.0 g; Females: 215.5 to 280.2 g.
- Housing: individually housed, 2 animals per cage at the time of mating.
- Diet: ad libitum feed (CE-2, CLEA Japan).
- Water: ad libitum tap water.
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 - 25ºC
- Humidity (%): 40 - 75%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h light/dark cycle.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: September 1, 2010 (62 males and 73 females, arrival date). - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The medium was warmed at 40ºC or less, and the test item was weighed and added to the solution, at a concentration of 5% (w/v). Two further solutions were prepared at concentrations of 2 and 0.8 % (w/v). These solutions were stored in a refrigerated space (3 - 10ºC) and shielded from light, and used within 7 days after preparation (storage: from September 14th to October 30th, 2010). The doses were administered by gavage.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): the test item was found to be moisture sensitive; the stability of the test item in olive oil was confirmed by analysis.
- Concentration in vehicle: 5, 2 and 0.8% (w/v)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5 mL/kg
- Purity: according to Japanese Pharmacopoeia. - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: 2 weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and sperm in vaginal smear, referred to as [day 0] of pregnancy.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): females were individually housed in a plastic breeding cage for rats (350 w × 400 d × 180 h mm) from 18th day of pregnancy to 4th day of nursing, and a paper pulp chips (Pepper Clean, Japan SLC) were used as bedding. No anomalies in the breeding environment were observed during the period, the measured value of the temperature in the animal room was 23.5 to 24.0ºC, the measured value of humidity was 52.0 to 70.0%. In addition, it was confirmed that the analysis results of the feed, drinking water and bedding that were supplied were within the tolerance limits described in the standard operating procedure manual.
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The test item content was measured by a validated analytical method after preparation of the dosing solution; the average content was found to be 90 - 110%, and the variation between measurements was within the acceptable range (average value ± 10%). No further details on analytical method provided (Annex D-1, D-2 not included).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males were treated from 2 weeks before mating until the day before necropsy (42 administrations in total). Females were treated from 2 weeks before mating until delivery.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily.
- Details on study schedule:
- - Animals arrival date: September 1, 2010
- Quarantine end date: September 14, 2010
- Dosing prior to mating: 2 weeks
- Mating: up to 2 weeks
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: [12] weeks
- End of administration period: December 10, 2010 - Dose / conc.:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 13 male and 13 female per group.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: the dose of this study was set based on the results of the 28-day repeated dose toxicity test (See 'Cross-reference'): In this test, animals were dosed with 15, 100 or 500 mg/kg test item for 28 days. In the high dose group, 2 females died, and reduced locomotor activity, supression of body weight gain, increase in liver weight, thickening of the duodenal mucosa, etc. were observed in the remaining animals; no effects were observed at 100 mg/kg bw. In the range finding study, toxicity symptoms such as reduced locomotor activity were also observed in animals dosed with 125 and 250 mg/kg test item for 7 days. Based on the available information, the high dose of this study was set at 250 mg/kg bw, and the spacing factor was 2.5, so the medium dose was 100 mg/kg bw and the low dose 40 mg/kg bw.
- Positive control:
- Not required.
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily before and after administration during administration and once daily during other rearing periods.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Male animals were weighed on the day 1 (administration start date), 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 days and on the autopsy day. Female animals were weighed on days 1, 7 and 14 of administration, pregnancy 0 (mating confirmation date), 7, 14, 20 days, day of delivery, 4 days after and on the autopsy day. If any animals died, they were weighed at the time of death.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (not a feeding study):
- Male animals were measured for food intake on days 1 to 2, 7 to 8, 14 to 15, 29 to 30, 35 to 36, and 41 to 42.
- Female animals were measured for food intake on days 1 to 2, 7 to 8, 14 to 15 of administration; days 0 to 1, 7 to 8, 14 to 15, 20 to 21 of gestation and days 3 to 4 of rearing. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- For each group, vaginal smear specimens were prepared every day after the start of administration following the sexual cycle observation up to the grouping day, and the sex cycle was observed until the copulation was confirmed. In addition, the average number of days from estrous period to estrous period was calculated for each individual.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in [P] male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight, sperm count in testes, sperm count in epididymides. - Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1] offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities.
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities.
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY: Not specified.
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: Not specified. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals as soon as possible after the last litters were produced.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals after the last litter of each generation was weaned (day 4).
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
- In males: liver, duodenum, prostate, seminal vesicle (including coagulated gland), mammary gland.
- In females: liver, duodenum, ovary, uterus, vagina, mammary gland. If the female or all babies died, also: heart, brain, kidney, lung. In females that had copulated but did not deliver or that died before delivery, liver and ovarian weights were measured.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed:
- In males, histopathological examination was performed on the liver, duodenum, testis, epididymis (0.1 M phosphate buffered 10% formalin solution).
- In females, histopathological examination was performed on the liver, duodenum and ovaries. In females that had copulated but did not deliver or that died before delivery, the number of corpus luteum was counted under a stereoscopic microscope and the implantation rate [(number of implantation / number of pregnant corpus luteum) X 100,%] was determined. In females that died or when all babies died, histopathological examinations also included: heart, brain, kidney, lung. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at [4] days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations as follows: all pups were subject to macroscopic examination, and any organ presenting abnormalities was fixed in 0.1 M phosphate buffered 10% formalin solution and stored.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera. - Statistics:
- Fisher's exact test of significance (5%) was carried out on the frequency, the mating rate, the conception rate and the morphological abnormality frequency of the babies.From the histopathological findings of the treated groups, the graded pathological tissue findings were determined by Marm-Whitney's U test and the total value of positive groups was determined by Fisher's one-sided probability test. Significant difference test with the group was conducted (significance: 5%).
For the other data, a value obtained for each individual or an average value for each litter was taken. First, the uniformity of variance of each group was tested (significance: 5%) by Bartlett's method. When the variance was uniform, a one-way analysis of variance (significance level: 5%) was performed, and when significance was found between groups, multiple comparisons were performed by the Dmrnett method (significance Level: 5%). Finally, Kruskal-Wallis's rank test (significance level: 5%) was performed when the variance was 0 in any group and when the variance was not uniform, significance was observed between the groups In the case of multiple comparison by Dunnett type test method (significance level: 5%). - Reproductive indices:
- - Copulation index = [Number of copulated pairs / number of mated pairs (%)]
- Fertility index = [number of fertile males / copulation index x 100 (%)]
- Implantation index = [Number of implantation scars / number of corpora lutea x 100 (%)] - Offspring viability indices:
- - Gestation index = [Number of dams with live offspring / number of pregnant dams x 100 (%)]
- Sex ratio = [Number of male offspring / (number of male + female offspring)]
- Delivery index = [Number of offspring at birth / number of implantation scars x 100 (%)]
- Birth index = [Number of live offspring at birth / number of implantation scars x 100 (%)]
- Live birth index = [Number of live offspring at birth / number of offspring at birth x 100 (%)]
- Viability index = [Number of live offspring 21 days after birth / number of live offspring after culling x 100 (%)] - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Females: one animal in the 100 mg/kg group died at perinatal stage, five in the 250 mg/kg group (table 2).
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the 250 mg/kg administration group, suppression of increase in body weight was observed in both males and females. No significant differences with the control were observed at any other dose.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the 250 mg/kg administration group, female food intake decreased. No effects were observed at 100 mg/kg or less.
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histopathological examination of the liver revealed bile duct expansion and diffuse Kupffer cell proliferation around the Gleason sheath in males and females at 250 mg / kg administration group. On histopathological examination of the duodenum, thickening of the mucosa was observed in males and females at the dose of 250 mg / kg. Degeneration / necrosis of the proximal renal tubular epithelium in the kidney cortex was observed in females whose whole litter died by nursing day 4.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The female sex cycle, mating rate and conception rate, number of corpus luteums of pregnant animals, implantation number, implantation rate and pregnancy period were not affected by administration of test substance.
The estrous regression days in the 250 mg/kg group increased, but it had been observed before administration that the same group's estrus regression days tended to be extended. - Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- testis, epididymis, prostate and seminal vesicle weights were not affected by the administration of the test substance.
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Failure of labor condition was observed in the group administered 100 and 250 mg / kg, and the birth rate decreased: the number of births and the number of babies born decreased, the live birth rate and the birth rate decreased. No effects on delivery rate, neonatal survival rate or sex ratio.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 40 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no effect of administration of the test substance on the sex ratio, the form and weight of the newborn infant.
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The birth rate, fertility rate and neonatal survival rate decreased in the 250 mg/kg administration group.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no effect of administration of the test substance on the sex ratio, the form and weight of the newborn infant.
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- mortality
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- reproductive effects occurring together with other toxic effects, but not as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects
- Conclusions:
- The NOAEL (based on toxicity) for both parent animals and first generation male/female Sprague Dawley rats was found to be 100 mg/kg bw; the NOAEL (based on reproductive ability) for parent male/female Sprague Dawley rats was found to be 40 mg/kg bw.
- Executive summary:
A Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test was conducted on the test item, according to OECD Guideline 421 (GLP study). 13 male and 13 female Sprague Dawley rats per group were exposed to 0 (control), 40, 100 or 250 mg/kg bw of test item by oral gavage, based on the results of a 28 -day repeated dose toxicity test performed previously. Males were dosed up to the day of conception and females were dosed throughout the study. Observations included clinical observations, body weight measurements, food intake, ostreus cycles, mating procedures, behavioural studies, evaluation of reproduction, weight of organs, and histopathological examinations. Toxicity signs were observed at the highest dose (lower body weight, enlarged liver, thickening of duodenum walls), and effects on reproduction were observed at the mid and high doses (lower birth rate, maternal deaths). Based on the available information, the NOAEL for general toxicity was set at 100 mg/kg bw, both for P0 and F1 generations, and the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was set at 40 mg/kg bw.
Reference
Table 2. Mortality in parental animals.
Animal number |
Dose (mg/kg) |
Death period |
Internal uterine findings at necropsy |
F03002 |
100 |
During labor |
8 fetus remains |
F04001 |
250 |
Nursing 3rd |
No abnormality |
F04004 |
250 |
Pregnancy 23rd |
15 fetus remains |
F04006 |
250 |
During labor |
2 fetus remains |
F04008 |
250 |
During labor |
10 fetus remains |
F04009 |
250 |
During labor |
1 fetus remains |
Table 3. Body weights of male rats.
Group |
|
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC |
40mg/kg |
DCC |
100mg/kg |
DCC |
250mg/kg |
|||||
Number of males |
|
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
||||||||
Days of administration |
1 |
397.4 |
± |
15.0 |
402.5 |
± |
14.7 |
397.0 |
± |
10.8 |
400.3 |
± |
14.7 |
|
7 |
429.3 |
± |
19.5 |
427.2 |
± |
22.0 |
421.2 |
± |
14.8 |
420.7 |
± |
16.6 |
|
14 |
459.0 |
± |
24.9 |
455.4 |
± |
24.8 |
449.9 |
± |
20.0 |
445.0 |
± |
20.3 |
|
21 |
481.7 |
± |
24.1 |
479.8 |
± |
26.1 |
470.2 |
± |
22.0 |
460.9 |
± |
23.6 |
|
28 |
510.7 |
± |
26.4 |
502.4 |
± |
26.5 |
494.1 |
± |
24.1 |
485.5 |
± |
29.5 |
|
35 |
533.7 |
± |
30.6 |
526.6 |
± |
26.3 |
516.2 |
± |
28.0 |
506.9 |
± |
32.2 |
|
42 |
554.0 |
± |
31.8 |
547.2 |
± |
30.3 |
535.6 |
± |
31.0 |
525.5 |
± |
35.5 |
Each value shows mean (g)±S.D.
Significantly different from the control group (*: P<0.05, **: P<0.01).
Table 4. Body weights of female rats.
Group |
|
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC 40 mg/kg |
DCC 100 mg/kg |
DCC 250 mg/kg |
Number of females |
|
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Days of administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
247.3 ± 11.9 |
248.1 ± 9.4 |
246.1 ± 12.2 |
250.2 ± 11.6 |
|
7 |
258.6 ± 12.3 |
258.9 ± 10.3 |
259.7 ± 12.0 |
257.5 ± 13.9 |
|
14 |
270.9 ± 15.9 |
270.9 ± 15.9 |
266.1 ± 16.7 |
260.7 ± 16.2 |
Number of dams |
|
13 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Days of pregnancy |
0 |
280.9 ± 12.6 |
279.7 ± 14.4 |
276.9 ± 19.4 |
267.5 ± 15.3 |
|
7 |
314.9 ± 17.1 |
309.7 ± 17.0 |
308.1 ± 21.4 |
293.9 ± 17.5 * |
|
14 |
351.6 ± 17.8 |
342.1 ± 18.4 |
347.7 ± 25.8 |
326.4 ± 18.5 ** |
|
20 |
432.6 ± 25.8 |
415.0 ± 20.8 |
423.5 ± 30.0 |
392.3 ± 22.9 ** |
Number of dams |
|
13 |
12 |
11 |
10 |
Days of lactation |
0 |
323.8 ± 24.3 |
315.8 ± 34.0 |
307.7 ± 34.2 |
291.5 ± 36.1 |
|
4 |
339.6 ± 26.7 (12) |
335.3 ± 20.8 (10) |
331.2 ± 26.9 (10) |
325.2 ± 13.4 (4) |
Each value shows mean (g) ± S.D. Significantly different from the control group (*: P<0.05, **: P<0.01). Figures in parentheses indicate number of dams.
Table 5. Organ weights of male rats
Group |
|
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC 40 mg/kg |
DCC 100 mg/kg |
DCC 250 mg/kg |
Number of males |
|
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Body weight |
(g) |
528.4 ± 33.5 |
521.6 ± 28.4 |
507.6 ± 28.9 |
491.7 ± 33.8 |
Liver |
(mg) |
14917.5 ± 1803.5 |
14677.0 ± 1145.0 |
15266.9 ± 2121.6 |
15699.2 ± 1366.2 |
|
(mg/g) |
28.160 ± 2.004 |
28.149 ± 1.780 |
29.991 ± 2.914 |
31.930 ± 1.807** |
Testes |
(mg) |
3257.5 ± 563.1 |
3441.9 ± 243.3 |
3293.5 ± 419.8 |
3387.7 ± 532.2 |
|
(mg/g) |
6.209 ± 1.230 |
6.618 ± 0.603 |
6.512 ± 0.912 |
6.922 ± 1.228 |
Epididymides |
(mg) |
1192.3 ± 194.7 |
1301.6 ± 102.0 |
1198.8 ± 88.7 |
1266.9 ± 158.8 |
|
(mg/g) |
2.268 ± 0.406 |
2.501 ± 0.223 |
2.368 ± 0.207 |
2.588 ± 0.377 |
Prostate, ventral |
(mg) |
626.5 ± 101.8 |
637.6 ± 162.5 |
638.5 ± 130.1 |
650.3 ± 104.6 |
|
(mg/g) |
1.194 ± 0.229 |
1.226 ± 0.313 |
1.256 ± 0.246 |
1.331 ± 0.245 |
Seminal vesicles |
(mg) |
1907.7 ± 430.4 |
1669.7 ± 338.9 |
1837.3 ± 216.5 |
1752.7 ± 126.9 |
|
(mg/g) |
3.614 ± 0.781 |
3.205 ± 0.638 |
3.617 ± 0.336 |
3.570 ± 0.214 |
Each value shows mean±S.D. Significantly different from the control group (*: P<0.05, **: P<0.01).
Table 6. Organ weights of female rats
Group |
|
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC 40 mg/kg |
DCC 100 mg/kg |
DCC 250 mg/kg |
Number of females |
|
12 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
Body weight |
(g) |
307.7±25.5 |
306.0±20.4 |
297.5±23.7 |
289.6±20.6 |
Liver |
(mg) |
10146.4±740.0 |
10223.8±555.2 |
15266.9±2121.6 |
15699.2±1366.2 |
|
(mg/g) |
33.120±3.014 |
33.501±2.342 |
34.760±2.501 |
35.956±4.321 |
Ovaries |
(mg) |
105.5±9.7 |
102.9±11.6 |
109.0±12.9 |
97.6±9.8 |
|
(mg/g) |
0.344±0.039 |
0.336±0. 032 |
0.367±0.044 |
0.338±0.033 |
Table 7. Reproductive performance.
Group |
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC 40 mg/kg |
DCC 100 mg/kg |
DCC 250 mg/kg |
Number of pairs |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Number of copulated pairs |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Copulation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Number of fertile males |
13 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Fertility index |
100 |
92.3 |
92.3 |
92.3 |
Pairing days until copulation |
2.6±1.3 (13) |
3.2±1.0 (13) |
2.8±1.2 (13) |
2.6± 1.0(13) |
Table 8. Reproduction/developmental toxicity.
Group |
Olive oil (vehicle) |
DCC 40 m/kg |
DCC100mg/kg |
DCC250mg/kg |
||
Number of dams |
13 |
12 |
11 |
|
8 |
|
Gestation length (days) Mean ± S.D. per dam Number of corpora lutea |
22.5 ± 0.5 |
22.3 ± 0.5 |
22.5 ± 0.5 |
|
22.5 ± 0.5 |
|
Total |
216 |
187 |
202 |
|
193 |
|
Mean ± S.D. per dam Number of implantation scars |
16.6 ± 2,3 |
15.6 ± 1.4 |
16.8 ± 1.8 |
(12) |
16.1 ± 1.9 |
(12) |
Total |
198 |
173 |
190 |
|
175 |
|
Mean ± S.D. per dam |
15.2 ± 2.0 |
14.4 ± 1.4 |
15.8 ± 1.9 |
(12) |
14.6 ± 5.3 |
(12) |
Implantation index (%) |
92.2 ± 8.7 |
92.7 ± 7.1 |
94.3 ± 7.6 |
(12) |
90.7 ± 19.4 |
(12) |
Gestation index (%) |
100.0 |
100.0 |
91.7 |
|
66.7 |
|
Number of offspring at birth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
184 |
164 |
161 |
|
101 |
|
Mean ± S.D. per dam Number of live offspring at birth |
14.2 ± 2.8 |
13.7 ± 1.4 |
14.6 ± 1.4 |
|
12.6 ± 4.3 |
|
Male |
87 |
69 |
78 |
|
39 |
|
Female |
92 |
90 |
73 |
|
39 |
|
Total |
179 |
159 |
151 |
|
78 |
|
Mean ± S.D. per dam Sex ratio |
13.8 ± 2.6 |
13.3 ± 1.4 |
13.7 ± 2.1 |
|
9.8 ± 5.7 |
|
Mean±S.D. per dam Number of dead offspring |
0.49 ± 0.06 |
0.43 ± 0.10 |
0.51 ± 0.12 |
|
0.40 ± 0.28 |
|
Total |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
23 |
|
Mean ±S.D. per dam Delivery index |
0.4 ± 0.9 |
0.4 ± 0.7 |
1.9 ± 3.9 |
|
2.9 ± 4.5 |
|
Mean%±S.D. per dam Birth index |
92.1 ± 8.9 |
94.8 ± 5.5 |
95.3 ± 6.6 |
|
90.6 ± 12.4 |
|
Mean% ±S.D. per dam Live birth index |
89.8 ± 9.5 |
910 ± 5.6 |
81.9 ± 28.3 |
|
72.2 ± 35.0 |
|
Mean% ±S.D. per dam |
97.6 ± 5.4 |
97.1 ± 4.6 |
93.9 ± 12.1 |
|
77.6 ± 33.2 |
|
Number of offspring on day 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
78 |
58 |
72 |
|
28 |
|
Female Sex ratio |
83 |
74 |
63 |
|
17 |
|
Mean ±S.D. per dam Viability index |
0.49 ± 0.06 (12) |
0.44 ± 0.09 (10) |
0.53 ± 0.11 |
(10) |
0.62 ± 0.09 |
(4) |
Mean% ±S.D. per dam |
90.9 ± 27.4 |
83.3 ± 38.9 |
86.2 ± 31.7 |
|
57.1 ± 53.5 |
(7) |
Number of external abnormalities 0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
Mean% ± S.D. per dam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
|
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 40 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available key study has a Klimisch score of 2.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test was conducted on the test item, according to OECD Guideline 421 (GLP study). 13 male and 13 female Sprague Dawley rats per group were exposed to 0 (control), 40, 100 or 250 mg/kg bw of test item by oral gavage, based on the results of a 28 -day repeated dose toxicity test performed previously. Males were dosed up to the day of conception and females were dosed throughout the study.Observations included clinical observations, body weight measurements, food intake, ostreus cycles, mating procedures, behavioural studies, evaluation of reproduction, weight of organs, and histopathological examinations. Toxicity signs were observed at the highest dose (lower body weight, enlarged liver, thickening of duodenum walls), and effects on reproduction were observed at the mid and high doses (lower birth rate, maternal deaths). Based on the available information, the NOAEL for general toxicity was set at 100 mg/kg bw, both for P0 and F1 generations, and the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was set at 40 mg/kg bw.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, the substance is not classified for reproductive toxicity according to CLP Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.