Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 207-050-4 | CAS number: 428-59-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study was selected as the key study because the information provided for the hazard endpoint is sufficient for the purpose of classification and labeling and/or risk assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Conducted according to guideline in effect at time of study conduct
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the guideline in effect at the time of study conduct.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Trifluoro(trifluoromethyl)oxirane
- EC Number:
- 207-050-4
- EC Name:
- Trifluoro(trifluoromethyl)oxirane
- Cas Number:
- 428-59-1
- Molecular formula:
- C3F6O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2,3-trifluoro-3-(trifluoromethyl)oxirane
- Details on test material:
- - Purity: 99.544%
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- preliminary toxicity test: 2800, 6900, 8300, 9700, 14000, 32000 and 37000 µmole per liter
second preliminary toxicity test: 240, 360, 550, 820, 1200, 1800 and 2800 µmole per liter
initial mutagenicity test: 48, 110, 240, 550, 1200 and 2800 µmole per liter
ftrst repeat mutagenicity assay: 9.4, 21, 48, 110, 240 and 550 µmole per liter
second repeat mutagenicity assay: 9.4, 21, 48, 110,240,550 and 1200 µmole per liter - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: air
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (all strains +S9), 2-nitrofluorene (TA98 -S9), sodium azide (TA100 and TA1535 -S9), 9-aminoacridine (TA1537 -S9), methyl methane sulfonate (WP2urvA -S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: One-half (0.5) milliliter of S9 or Sham mix and 100 µL of tester strain were added to 2.0 mL of molten selective top agar at 45±2°C. After vortexing, the mixture was overlaid onto the surface of 25 mL of minimal bottom agar. The overlaid plates were inverted and placed
uncovered in the appropriate number of 9-liter desiccators. An appropriate quantity of the test substance was introduced into each desiccator by withdrawing an appropriate amount of air and replacing it with the test substance.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: The desiccators were incubated, with stirring, for approximately 24 hours at 37±2°C.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Following the 24-hour incubation, the plates were removed from the desiccators and incubated with the lids replaced at 37±2°C for an additional 24 to 48 hours.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48 to 72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 - Evaluation criteria:
- For the test substance to be evaluated positive, it must have caused a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing concentrations of test substance. Data sets for tester strains TA1535 and TA1537 were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response is equal to or greater than 3.0-times the mean vehicle control value. Data sets for tester strains TA98, TAl00 and
WP2 uvrA were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response was equal to or greater than 2.0-times the mean vehicle control value.
The following criteria must be met for the mutagenicity test to be considered valid. All Salmonella tester strain cultures must demonstrate the presence of the deep rough mutation (rfa) and the deletion in the uvrB gene. Cultures of tester strains TA98 and TAl00 must demonstrate the presence of the pKM101 plasmid R-factor. All WP2 uvrA cultures must demonstrate the deletion in the uvrA gene. All cultures must demonstrate the characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants in the vehicle controls as follows (inclusive): TA98 , 10 - 50; TAl00, 80 - 240; TA1535, 5 - 45; TA1537, 3 - 21; WP2 uvrA, 10 - 60. To ensure that appropriate numbers of bacteria are plated, tester strain culture titers must be greater than or equal to 0.3x10e9 cells/mL. The mean of each positive control must exhibit at least a 3.0-fold increase in the number of revertants over the mean value of the respective vehicle control. A minimum of three non-toxic dose levels is required to evaluate test data. A dose level is considered toxic if one or both of the following criteria are met: (1) A >50 % reduction in the mean number of revertants per plate as compared to the mean vehicle control value. This reduction must be accompanied by an abrupt dose-dependent drop in the revertant count. (2) A moderate reduction in the background lawn. - Statistics:
- For each replicate plating, the mean and standard deviation of the number of revertants per plate were calculated.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Initial mutagenicity test toxicity beginning at 240 or 550 µmole/L . First repeat mutagenicity assay, toxicity beginning at 240 or 550 µmole/L. Second repeat mutagenicity assay, toxicity beginning at 550 µmole/L
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Initial mutagenicity test toxicity beginning 2800 µmole/L
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
In the initial preliminary toxicity test, the maximum dose tested was 37000 µmole per liter. This dose represents a 90% replacement of ambient air with test substance. Dose levels tested were 2800, 6900, 8300, 9700, 14000, 32000 and 37000 µmole per liter. No precipitate was observed but toxicity was observed beginning at 2800 µmole per liter. A second preliminary toxicity test was performed with dose levels 240, 360, 550, 820, 1200, 1800 and 2800 µmole per liter. No precipitate was observed but toxicity was observed beginning at 550, 820, 1200 or 1800 µmole per liter. Based on the findings of the toxicity test, the maximum dose plated in the mutagenicity test was 2800 µmole per liter.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
This study and the conclusions which are drawn from it fulfill the quality criteria (validity, reliability, repeatability).
The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test Using Gas-Phase Exposure indicate that, under the conditions of this study, the test substance did not cause a positive mutagenic response in either the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. - Executive summary:
The test substance was tested in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test using gas-phase exposure using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA90, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and Escherichia coli tester strain WPuvrA in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9. The test was performed in two phases, using the desiccator method. The first phase, the preliminary toxicity test, was used to establish the dose-range for the mutagenicity test. The second phase, the mutagenicity test, was used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test substance. Untreated controls (air controls) were used as the negative controls.
In the initial preliminary toxicity test, the maximum dose tested was 37000µmole per liter. This dose represents a 90% replacement of ambient air with test substance. Dose levels tested were 2800, 6900, 8300, 9700, 14000, 32000, and 37000µmole per liter. No precipitate was observed but toxicity was observed beginning at 2800µmole per liter. A second preliminary toxicity test was performed under the same test conditions with dose levels of 240, 360, 550, 820, 1200, 1800, and 2800µmole per liter. No precipitate was observed but toxicity was observed beginning at 550, 820, 1200, or 1800µmole per liter. Based on the findings of the toxicity test, the maximum dose plated in the mutagenicity test was 2800µmole per plate.
In the initial mutagenicity test, no positive mutagenic response was observed with tester strain WP2uvrA in the presence of S9 activation and with tester strains TA98, TA1535, and WP2uvrA in the absence of S9 activation. The dose levels tested were 48, 110, 240, 550, 1200, and 2800µmole. No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed beginning at 240 or 550µmole per liter with Salmonella tester strains and at 2800µmole per liter with E. coli. In the first repeat mutagenicity assay with tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 in the presence of S9 activation and tester strains TA100 and TA1537 in the absence of S9 activation, dose levels tested were 9.4, 21, 48, 110, 240, and 550µmole per plate. No positive mutagenic response was observed. No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed beginning at 240 or 550µmole per liter. In the second repeat mutagenicity assay with tester strain TA100 in the absence of S9 activation, dose levels tested were 9.4, 21, 48, 110, 240, 550, and 1200µmole per plate. No positive mutagenic response was observed. No precipitate was observed but toxicity was observed beginning at 550µmole per liter.
The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test Using Gas-Phase Exposure indicate that, under the conditions of the study, the test substance did not cause a positive mutagenic response either in the presence or absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver S9.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.