Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-435-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- according to OECD and GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 835.3110 (Ready Biodegradability)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Aluminium tris(5,7,12,14-tetrahydro-7,14-dioxoquino[2,3-b]acridine-2-sulphonate)
- EC Number:
- 278-207-2
- EC Name:
- Aluminium tris(5,7,12,14-tetrahydro-7,14-dioxoquino[2,3-b]acridine-2-sulphonate)
- Cas Number:
- 75431-69-5
- Molecular formula:
- C20H12N2O5S.1/3Al
- IUPAC Name:
- aluminum tris(7,14-dioxo-5,7,12,14-tetrahydroquino[2,3-b]acridine-2-sulfonate)
- Reference substance name:
- 5,12-dihydroquino[2,3-b]acridine-7,14-dione
- EC Number:
- 213-879-2
- EC Name:
- 5,12-dihydroquino[2,3-b]acridine-7,14-dione
- Cas Number:
- 1047-16-1
- Molecular formula:
- C20H12N2O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 5,12-dihydroquino[2,3-b]acridine-7,14-dione
- Reference substance name:
- Dialuminium tris(5,7,12,14-tetrahydro-7,14-dioxoquino[2,3-b]acridine-2,9-disulphonate)
- EC Number:
- 243-319-2
- EC Name:
- Dialuminium tris(5,7,12,14-tetrahydro-7,14-dioxoquino[2,3-b]acridine-2,9-disulphonate)
- Cas Number:
- 19795-24-5
- Molecular formula:
- C20H12N2O8S2.2/3Al
- IUPAC Name:
- dialuminium tris(5,7,12,14-tetrahydro-7,14-dioxoquino[2,3-b]acridine-2,9-disulphonate)
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure):
Municipal sewage treatment plant, Mannheim, Germany
- the inoculum was collected on 2016-11-14 from the aeration tank of the plant.
- Pretreatment/Concentration of sludge: s suitable aliquot of the activated sludge suspension was sieved by a finely woven mesh with a mesh size of about 1 mm. To reduce the concent of inorganic carbon in the blank controls the activated slduge was aerated with carbon dioxide free air for about 72 hours at 22 ± 2°C. At the day of exposure the suspension was washed on time with drinking water. Therefore the aeration was stopped and the sludge was allowed to settle. After settling the supernatant was discarded and the remaining sludge suspension was filled up with drining water. The concentration of the sludge was adjusted to 6.0 g/L dry weight. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
Initial test substance concentrationopen allclose all
- Initial conc.:
- ca. 51 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 20 mg/L
- Based on:
- TOC
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: Mineral salts medium acc. to OECD 301 B / CO2 Evolution Test
- Test temperature: 22 +/- 2°C
- Dispersion treatment: Continuous magnetic stirring
- Aeration: carbon dioxide free air at a flow of approximately 800 mL per hour
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: 2000 mL incubation bottles filled up to a volume of 1500 mL
- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 1 for the reference item, 1 for inhibition control, 2 for the blank control, 2 for the test item
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: carbon dioxide free air at a flow of approximately 800 mL per hour
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used:
CO2 adsorption vessels were connected to the air outlets of the incubation vessels via a series of 2 scrubbing bottles, each containing 100 mL of
a 0.05 mol/LNaOH solution.
- Course of the study:
The following incubation vessels were prepared:
- two for the test item concentration (TS1, TS2)
- one for the functional control (RS)
- two for the inoculum control (BC1, BC2)
- one for the inhibition control respectively (IH)
The test assays were prepared on the day of exposure. First, the required volumes of deionized water and the solutions of the mineral salts were dosed to all test vessels. The required amounts of the test substance aliquots for a concentration of 20 mg/L TOC were weighed into the vessels of the test substance assays and to the vessel of the inhibition control. Due to the poor water solubility of the test substance these test assays were treated for few minutes in an ultrasonic bath to ensure an even distribution of the test substance in the test medium. Finally enough reference substance (aniline) stock solution was added to reach 20 mg/L TOC in the reference substance assay and the inhibition control.
The pH-values in the test vessels were measured and adjusted to 7.4 +/- 0.2, if necessary. Aliquots of activated sludge suspension were added to all test vessels to adjust the concentration of activated sludge to 30 mg/L dry weight.
At being of exposure phase the test vessels were connected with an aeration unit and the bubble aeration with carbon dioxide free air was started after connecting with the CO2 adsorption scrubbin bottles to the air outlets of the incubation vessels.
At the end of exposure the pH values were measured in each test vessel. For stripping of carbon dioxide dissolved in the test medium each test vessel was acidified by adding 2 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid. The concentration of DOC in the blank controls and the reference substance assays were determined. Due to the poor solubility of the test item DOC measurements could not be performed in the test substance assays.
Teh aeration was coninued for about 24 hours and the released carbon dioxide amounts in both traps of each test vessel were determined and added to the calculated amount of the previous day.
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency:
TIC analysis was carried out on days 1, 4, 7, 11, 14, 18, 21, 25, 27, 28, 29
- Sampling method:
For each measurement the first stripping bottle was removed and a new bottle was connected to the last one.
Reference substance
- Reference substance:
- aniline
Results and discussion
% Degradation
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 9
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The test substance was not readily biodegradable in this carbon dioxide evolution test based on the quantitative determination of the formed carbon dioxide. in the test substance assays by comparison with the calculated maximal theoretical carbon dioxide production.
Because the test substance is a mixture of structural similar compounds, the criterion of the ten days window was not applied.
The degree of biodegradation after an exposure period of 28 days was > 10 %. The value represents the mean of two test assays.
BOD5 / COD results
- Results with reference substance:
- In the inhibition control containing both test and reference item a biodegradation of 29 % was determined within 14 days and it came to 44 % after 28 days. The biodegradation of the reference item aniline achieved a value of 66 % after 14 days and 94 % after 28 days.
Any other information on results incl. tables
total organic carbon of test substance: 395 mg/g
reference substance: aniline; stock solution: 401.5 mg/L, Theoretical Organic Carbon (ThOC): 311 mg/L
sample |
BC1 |
BC2 |
RS |
IC |
TS1 |
TS2 |
Test substance concentration [mg/L] |
- |
- |
- |
50.3 |
50.9 |
50.7 |
TOC concentration of test substance [mg/L], nominal value |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
20 |
20 |
TOC concentration of reference substance [mg/L], nominal value |
- |
- |
20 |
20 |
- |
- |
Stock solution reference substance [mL/test vessel] |
- |
- |
96 |
96 |
- |
- |
Deionized water [mL/test vessel] |
1473 |
1473 |
1377 |
1377 |
1473 |
1473 |
Mineral medium [mL/test vessel] |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
19.5 |
Inoculum (6 g/L dry matter) [mL/test vessel] |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
DIC values at start of exposure [mg/L] |
0.7 |
0.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
0.8 |
0.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
pH values at start of exposure |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
pH values at start end exposure |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
Table 2: measurement of Total Inorganic Carbon
Day |
BC NaOH |
BC1 |
BC2 |
RS |
IH |
TS1 |
TS2 |
0 |
0.8 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
0.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
1.6 |
4.6 |
3.9 |
6.8 |
6.0 |
7.0 |
5.1 |
|
1.4 |
4.5 |
3.6 |
6.6 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
5.0 |
4 |
1.1 |
17.4 |
15.7 |
84.2 |
58.9 |
22.2 |
16.3 |
|
1.0 |
17.4 |
15.4 |
84.1 |
58.9 |
21.8 |
16.2 |
7 |
1.1 |
21.9 |
20.6 |
82.3 |
91.0 |
26.2 |
21.6 |
|
1.2 |
21.7 |
20.5 |
82.1 |
90.4 |
26.0 |
21.3 |
11 |
0.6 |
23.9 |
26.3 |
56.9 |
58.0 |
31.6 |
25.1 |
|
0.8 |
24.1 |
26.1 |
57.3 |
57.6 |
31.5 |
24.9 |
14 |
1.1 |
17.7 |
17.3 |
51.2 |
46.0 |
21.7 |
22.3 |
|
1.1 |
17.9 |
17.4 |
51.3 |
46.1 |
21.9 |
22.4 |
18 |
0.7 |
20.2 |
20.6 |
53.3 |
46.2 |
24.6 |
18.3 |
|
0.7 |
19.7 |
21.3 |
53.6 |
45.6 |
24.0 |
18.5 |
21 |
1.0 |
14.4 |
15.3 |
31.9 |
36.4 |
21.7 |
15.4 |
|
1.1 |
14.3 |
15.3 |
31.8 |
36.5 |
21.8 |
15.4 |
25 |
0.9 |
16.0 |
16.4 |
34.6 |
40.2 |
24.9 |
17.0 |
|
0.9 |
15.6 |
16.1 |
34.1 |
40.3 |
24.7 |
16.7 |
27 |
1.1 |
11.8 |
10.1 |
21.2 |
19.9 |
13.2 |
11.7 |
|
1.0 |
11.7 |
10.0 |
20.8 |
19.3 |
12.7 |
11.4 |
28 |
1.3 |
7.7 |
7.4 |
12.2 |
10.6 |
8.0 |
7.1 |
|
1.3 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
12.1 |
10.3 |
8.0 |
6.8 |
29 |
|
10.2 |
14.7 |
13.1 |
14.7 |
15.9 |
7.9 |
flask 1 |
|
10.4 |
14.8 |
13.2 |
14.9 |
15.9 |
7.8 |
29 |
|
5.4 |
5.1 |
5.6 |
4.9 |
5.8 |
7.6 |
flask 2 |
|
5.4 |
5.1 |
5.5 |
4.8 |
5.8 |
7.6 |
The NaOH blank value is determined on filling the absorption vessels. The measured values applies for the first and the second sampling respectively. The NaOH blank value was subtracted from each test vessel.
Table 3: degree of biodegradation [% CO2/ThCO2]
Test duration [days] |
RS |
IH |
TS1 |
TS2 |
TS mean value |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
24 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
44 |
19 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
55 |
25 |
7 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
66 |
29 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
18 |
77 |
34 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
21 |
83 |
37 |
12 |
2 |
7 |
25 |
89 |
41 |
15 |
2 |
9 |
27 |
92 |
43 |
15 |
2 |
9 |
28 |
94 |
44 |
17 |
1 |
9 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions the test item is classified as not readily biodegradable within the 28 day period of the study.
- Executive summary:
The ready biodegradability of the test item was determined with a non-adapted activated sludge over a test period of 28 days according to OECD 301B. The test item was tested at a concentration of 51 mg/L with 2 replicates corresponding to a carbon content (TOC) of 20 mg C/L in the test vessels.The test vessels were incubated at a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C.
The biodegradation of the test item was followed by TIC analysis of the quantity of CO2produced by the respiration of bacteria. The degradation was stopped on day 28 by acidification of the test solutions. The last measurement was made on day 29 after residual CO2had been purged from the test solutions over a period of 24 hours. The percentage CO2 production was calculated in relation to the theoretical CO2production (ThCO2) of the test item. The biodegradation was calculated for each TIC measurement.
To check the activity of the test system aniline was used as functional control. The percentage degradation of the functional control reached the pass level of 60 % within 14 days and a maximum biodegradation of 94 % after 18 days.
In the inhibition control containing both test and reference item a biodegradation of 29 % was determined within 14 days and it came to 44 % after 28 days. The biodegradation of the reference item was not inhibited by the test item in the toxicity control.
The test substance was not readily biodegradable in this carbon dioxide evolution test based on the quantitative determination of the formed carbon dioxide. in the test substance assays by comparison with the calculated maximal theoretical carbon dioxide production.
Because the test substance is a mixture of structural similar compounds, the criterion of the ten days window was not applied.
The degree of biodegradation after an exposure period of 28 days was > 10 %. The value represents the mean of two test assays.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.