Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-833-9 | CAS number: 872-93-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation in vitro (OECT TG 439): not skin irritating
Eye irritation in vitro (OECT TG 437 / OECD TG 492): serious eye irritation
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21 Sep 2017 - 16 Oct 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 20 July 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: Adult donors 17-EKIN-041
- Source strain:
- other: 09-KERA-007 09-KERA-010
- Justification for test system used:
- In the interest of sound science and animal welfare, a sequential testing strategy is recommended to minimize the need of in vivo testing. One of the validated in vitro skin irritation tests is the EPISKIN test, which is recommended in international guidelines (e.g. OECD and EC).
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EPISKIN Small ModelTM (EPISKIN-SMTM, 0.38 cm2)
- Tissue batch number(s): Batch no.: 17-EKIN-041
- Production date: 10 Oct 2017
- Date of initiation of testing: 10 Oct 2017
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: untill all test item was removed
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 0.3 mg/mL in PBS
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader.
- Wavelength: 570nm
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- A test item is considered irritant in the skin irritation test if:
The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test item and 42 hours of post incubation is ≤ 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls.
- A test item is considered non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test if:
The relative mean tissue viability of three individual tissues after 15 minutes of exposure to the test item and 42 hours of post incubation is > 50% of the mean viability of the negative controls. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 µL
- Concentration (if solution): Undiluted
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 25µL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 25µL
- Concentration (if solution): 5% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 ± 0.5 minutes
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 hours at 37°C
- Number of replicates:
- 3
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Main
- Value:
- 101
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Direct-MTT reduction: No
- Colour interference with MTT: No
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: refer to table - Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritant
- Remarks:
- in accordance with Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP)
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study 3-methyl sulfolane does not need to be classified for skin irritation in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
- Executive summary:
3-Methyl Sulfolane was evaluated for its ability to induce skin irritation on a human three dimensional epidermal model (OECD TG 439 (EPISKIN-SMTM)). The test item was applied undiluted (25 µl), directly on top of the skin tissue for 15 ± 0.5 minutes. After a 42 hour post-incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment.
Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 101%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the test item was above 50% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment the test item is considered to be non-irritant.
The positive control had a mean cell viability of 10% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570(optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was < 5%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
In conclusion, 3-Methyl Sulfolane is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test under the experimental conditions described in this report andshould not be classified according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations and according tothe criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
Reference
Historical Control Data for In Vitro Skin Irritation Studies
|
Negative control (absorption; OD570) |
Positive control (absorption; OD570) |
Range |
0.676 – 1.336 |
0.036 – 0.549 |
Mean |
1.01 |
0.16 |
SD |
0.16 |
0.10 |
n |
155 |
154 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
The above mentioned historical control data range of the controls were obtained by collecting all data over the period of November 2013 to November 2016.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 17 Oct 2017 - 17 Oct 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- July 26, 2013
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Vitelco, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Characteristics of donor animals: 6-60 months
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline without antibioticsin a suitable container under cooled conditions.
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: eyes exhibiting defects were discarded
- Indication of any antibiotics used: none used - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 +/- 1 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 120 +/- 10 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- single sample, measured in triplicate
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium) containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) Foetal Bovine Serum. The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) of BASF with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 C.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
After the incubation period, the medium was removed from both compartments and replaced with fresh cMEM. Opacity determinations were performed on each of the corneas using an opacitometer. The opacity of each cornea was read against a cMEM filled chamber, and the initial opacity reading thus determined was recorded. Corneas that had an initial opacity reading higher than 7 were not used.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
Three corneas were selected at random for each treatment group.
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
Unexposed
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
Ethanol
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
Undiluted 10 min exposure time
TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: at least 2
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: yes 120 +/- 10 minutes
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea using an opacitometer
- Corneal permeability: microtiter plate reader (OD490) TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader
- Others (e.g, pertinent visual observations, histopathology): (please specify)
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: according to guideline - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Main
- Value:
- 11
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- IVIS > 3 ≤ 55, no prediction on the classification can be made according to UN GHS
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
-
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
The positive control gives an in vitro irritancy score that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean.
The negative control responses should result in opacity and permeability values that are less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range.
Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: see table - Interpretation of results:
- other: Not determinable
- Remarks:
- in accordance with Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP)
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the present study, 3-Methyl Sulfolane induced an IVIS > 3 ≤ 55. Therefore no prediction on the classification can be made according to UN GHS and Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
- Executive summary:
The eye irritation hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane was as measured Acoording to OECDTG437 (BCOP test). The eye damage of the test substance was tested through topical application for 10 minutes. The test item was applied as it is (750 µl) directly on top of the corneas. The negative and positive were considered valid. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. 3-Methyl Sulfolane induced ocular irritation through one endpoint (opacity), resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 11 after 10 minutes of treatment.
In conclusion, since 3-Methyl Sulfolane induced an IVIS > 3 ≤ 55, no prediction on the classification can be made.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 13 Nov 2017 - 17 Nov 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- 09 October 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- human
- Strain:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- EpiOcular™ (OCL-200-EIT MatTek Corporation, Lot: 27406 Kit Q)
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- - Justification of the test method and considerations regarding applicability
: In the interest of sound science and animal welfare, a sequential testing strategy is recommended to minimize the need of in vivo testing. One of the validated in vitro eye irritation tests is the EpiOcular test, which is recommended in international guidelines and scientific publications (e.g. OECD).
- Description of the cell system used, incl. certificate of authenticity and the mycoplasma status of the cell live
All cells used to produce EpiOcular™ are purchased or derived from tissue obtained by MatTek Corporation from accredited institutions. In all cases, consent was obtained by these institutions from the donor or the donor's legal next of kin, for use of the cells or derivatives of the tissue for research purposes. The cells used to produce EpiOcular™ tissue are screened for potential biological contaminants. Tests performed for each of the potential biological contaminant listed in the analysis that follows, where performed according to the test method given. The product resulted in "no detection" for the following potential biological contaminants determined by the stated test method:
Keratinocytes:
HIV-1 virus - Oligonucleotide-directed amplification
Hepatitis B virus - Oligonucleotide- directed amplification
Hepatitis C virus - Oligonucleotide- directed amplification
Bacteria, yeast, and other fungi - long term antibiotic, antimycotic free culture - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 μl
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 30 ± 2 minutes at 37.0 ± 1.0°C
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 12 ± 2 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- tissues per test item
- Details on study design:
- - Details of the test procedure used
:
The EpiOcular tissue construct is a non-keratinized epithelium (0.6 cm2) prepared from normal human keratinocytes (MatTek). It models the cornea epithelium with progressively stratified, but not cornified cells. These cells are not transformed or transfected with genes to induce an extended life span in culture. The “tissue” is prepared in inserts with a porous membrane through which the nutrients pass to the cells. A cell suspension is seeded into the insert in specialized medium. After an initial period of submerged culture, the medium is removed from the top of the tissue so that the epithelial surface is in direct contact with the air. This allows the test material to be directly applied to the epithelial surface in a fashion similar to how the corneal epithelium would be exposed in vivo.
- RhCE tissue construct used, including batch number :
EpiOcular™ (OCL-200-EIT MatTek Corporation, Lot: 27406 Kit Q)
- Duration and temperature of exposure, post-exposure immersion and post-exposure incubation periods (where applicable)
3-Methyl Sulfolane exposure (30 ± 2 minutes at 37.0 ± 1.0°C), and 12 ± 2 minute (Post-Soak)
- Indication of controls used for direct MTT-reducers and/or colouring test chemicals: both the MTT Color interference test and direct MTT reduction test indicated no interference.
- Wavelength and band pass (if applicable) used for quantifying MTT formazan, and linearity range of measuring device (e.g. spectrophotometer) : 570nm in duplicate with the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader.
- Description of the method used to quantify MTT formazan : The amount of extracted formazan is determined spectrophotometrically at 570 nm in duplicate with the TECAN Infinite® M200 Pro Plate Reader.
- Description of evaluation criteria used including the justification for the selection of the cut-off point for the prediction model
The test chemical is identified as not requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (No Category) ifthe mean percent tissue viability after exposure and post-exposure incubation is more than (>) 60%. In this case no further testing in other test methods is required. The test chemical is identified as potentially requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or Category 1) ifthe mean percent tissue viability after exposure and post exposure incubation is less than or equal (:S) to 60%.
- Reference to historical positive and negative control results demonstrating suitable run acceptance criteria
The in vitro eye irritation test is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The absolute mean OD570 of the two tissues of the negative control should be > 0.8 and <2.5.
b) The mean relative tissue viability of the positive control should be <50% relative to the negative control.
c) The difference between the % tissue viabilities of the two identically treated replicates should be <20.
In case of color interference and/or MTT interacting test items:
a) The %NSCiiving should be~ 50% relative to the negative control OD.
b) The non-specific MTT reduction should be~ 50% relative to the negative control OD.
- Complete supporting information for the specific RhCE tissue construct used : available as certificate of analysis
- Positive and negative control means and acceptance ranges based on historical data : refer to table - Irritation parameter:
- other: Tissue viability
- Remarks:
- (mean)
- Run / experiment:
- Main
- Value:
- 5.15
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline: refer to table - Interpretation of results:
- other: Cat.1 eye irritant
- Remarks:
- in accordance with Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP)
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study 3-Methyl Sulfolane is potentially irritant or corrosive. The test item needs to be classified as a Category 1 or 2 eye irritant in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the eye hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane, in a Reconstructed Human EpiOcular™ Model.The possible eye hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane was tested through topical application for 30 minutes. 3-Methyl Sulfolane was applied undiluted (50 µl) directly on top of the tissue for 30±2 minutes.
After exposure the cornea epithelial construct was thoroughly rinsed to remove the test item and transferred to fresh medium for an immersion incubation. Afterwards, the tissues were transferred to fresh medium and incubated for 2 hours at standard culture conditions, prior to determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect. The results obtained with the positive and negative control were considered valid, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
Eye hazard potential is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 30±2 minutes treatment with 3-Methyl Sulfolane compared to the negative control tissues was 5%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for 3-Methyl Sulfolane was below 60% after 30±2 minutes treatment it is considered to be potentially irritant or corrosive to the eye.
Referenceopen allclose all
Historical Control Data
for the BCOP Studies
|
Negative control |
Positive control |
||
|
Opacity |
Permeability |
In vitroIrritancy Score |
In vitroIrritancy Score |
Range |
-2.9 – 3.0 |
-0.016 – 0.042 |
-2.8 – 3.0 |
34.7 – 78.2 |
Mean |
0.08 |
0.01 |
0.17 |
56.01 |
SD |
1.04 |
0.01 |
1.14 |
12.51 |
n |
84 |
77 |
78 |
55 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
The above mentioned historical control data range of the controls were obtained by collecting all data over the period of Aug 2014 to Aug 2017.
Historical control values
|
Negative control (absorption; OD570) |
Positive control (absorption; OD570) |
Positive control (viability; %) |
Range |
1.077 – 1.805 |
0.029 – 0.793 |
2.11 – 48.25 |
Mean |
1.52 |
0.42 |
26.86 |
SD |
0.21 |
0.23 |
14.11 |
n |
16 |
16 |
16 |
SD = Standard deviation
n = Number of observations
The above mentioned historical control data range of the controls were obtained by collecting all data over the period of January 2013 to May 2017.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation in vitro (OECD TG 439)
3-Methyl Sulfolane was evaluated for its ability to induce skin irritation on a human three dimensional epidermal model (OECD TG 439 (EPISKIN-SMTM)). The test item was applied undiluted (25 µl), directly on top of the skin tissue for 15 ± 0.5 minutes. After a 42 hour post-incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment.
Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment with the test item compared to the negative control tissues was 101%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for the test item was above 50% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes treatment the test item is considered to be non-irritant.
The positive control had a mean cell viability of 10% after 15 ± 0.5 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570(optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the laboratory historical control data range. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was < 5%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.
In conclusion, 3-Methyl Sulfolane is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test under the experimental conditions described in this report and should not be classified according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations and according to the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
Eye irritation in vitro (OECD TG 437 & 492)
Two in vitro studies were available for this endpoint which were used as part of a weight of evidence approach:
In the first study, the eye irritation hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane was determined according to OECDTG437 (BCOP test). The test substance was tested through topical application for 10 minutes. The test item was applied as it is (750 µl) directly on top of the corneas. The negative and positive control were considered valid. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. 3-Methyl Sulfolane induced ocular irritation through one endpoint (opacity), resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 11 after 10 minutes of treatment. In conclusion, since 3 -Methyl Sulfolane induced an IVIS > 3 ≤ 55, meaning no prediction can be made if the substance can cause serious eye damage.
In the second study, the eye hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane was evaluated in a Reconstructed Human EpiOcular™ Model. The possible eye hazard potential of 3-Methyl Sulfolane was tested through topical application for 30 minutes. 3-Methyl Sulfolane was applied undiluted (50 µl) directly on top of the tissue for 30±2 minutes. After exposure the cornea epithelial construct was thoroughly rinsed to remove the test item and transferred to fresh medium for an immersion incubation. Afterwards, the tissues were transferred to fresh medium and incubated for 2 hours at standard culture conditions, prior to determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect. The results obtained with the positive and negative control were considered valid, indicating that the test system functioned properly. Eye hazard potential is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test item. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 30±2 minutes treatment with 3-Methyl Sulfolane compared to the negative control tissues was 5%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for 3-Methyl Sulfolane was below 60% after 30±2 minutes treatment it is considered to be potentially irritant or corrosive to the eye.
From this available data it is not possible to conclude on a classification for 3 -methyl sulfolane. The result of the BCOP test does not conclude on serious eye damage, where the EpiOcular test indicates the substance should be at least regarded a serious eye irritant. In addition, the available data with regard to skin irritation (OECD 439 & 402) does not support the substance being seriously irritating as the result is negative in both tests. Taking this together with the eye irritation results, it is considered safe to conclude that 3-methyl sulfolane is a serious eye irritant and does not induce serious eye damage.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information, 3-methyl sulfolane does not need to
be classified for skin irritation in accordance with the criteria
outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation.
Based on the available information, 3-methyl sulfolane is considered to be an eye irritant (Eye Irrit. 2 / H319) in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.