Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016-05-25 - 2016-05-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted 28 July 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Skinethic skin irritation test -42bis Standard operating procedure (SOP) 2009
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Nα-acetyl-DL-tryptophan
EC Number:
201-739-3
EC Name:
Nα-acetyl-DL-tryptophan
Cas Number:
87-32-1
Molecular formula:
C13H14N2O3
IUPAC Name:
N-acetyltryptophan
Test material form:
solid

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: SkinEthic™ RHE-model
Source strain:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
No vehicle used; Test item was applied neat to the tissues
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthic™ RHE-model (Episkin/Skin Ethic Laboratories, Lyon, France)
- Tissue batch number: 16-RHE-052
- Expiration Date: May 30, 2016

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 42 ± 1 min at room temperature; thereafter at 37 °C for 42 ± 1 h

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: Tissues were gently rinsed with DPBS in order to remove any residual test material. Excess DPBS was removed by gently shaking the tissue inserts and blotting the bottom of the tissues inserts with blotting paper.

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h ± 5 min
- Spectrophotometer: microplate reader (ELx800, BioTek Instruments GmbH, Bad Friedrichshall, Germany)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: The quality of the RHE model was assessed by undertaking a MTT cell viability test.
- Barrier function: The barrier function was assessed by determination of the exposure time required to reduce tissue viability by 50% (ET-50) upon application of 100 μL of 1% Triton X-100. The ET-50 value was determined to be 6.9 h.
- Other: Absence of significant abnormalities after histological observations (HES stained vertical paraffin)

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: The test item as well as the positive and negative control were tested in batch-triplicates. Therefore, a total number of nine tissues was used in this study.

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
The test substance did not directly reduce MTT.

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be irritant to skin if the viability is less than 50%
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin the viability is greater than or equal to 50%

ACCEPTABILITY CRITERA
The negative control OD values for the RHE-model have to be in the range of ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 3.0.
The negative control data meet the acceptance criteria if the mean OD value is higher or equal than a historically established boundary at 570 nm. The boundary is two standard deviations below the current historical mean (1.417). The standard deviation value is considered valid if ≤ 18% of the group mean value.
The positive control data meet the acceptance criteria if the mean viability value, expressed as % of the negative control, is lower than or equal to a historically established boundary. The boundary is three standard deviations above the current historical mean (3.26%).
The standard deviation between the three tissue replicates in each group shall be ≤ 18%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 16 mg per tissue

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 16 µL per tissue (Dulbecco`s Phosphate-Buffered Saline)

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 16 µL per tissue
- Concentration: 5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate in deionised water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
42 min (± 1 minute)
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours (± 1 hour)
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment 1 / Run 1
Value:
96
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks:
The test item was applied neat to the tissues
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Acceptability of the Quality Control Data of the Skin Model with Reference to Historical Batch Data:
The negative control OD values were 1.857, 1.830 and 1.822 and, thus, in the range of ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 3.0.

Acceptability of the Positive and Negative Control Data:
After treatment with the negative control (DPBS-buffer) the mean OD was 1.836 (standard deviation: 0.99%) and, thus, higher than the historically established threshold of 1.417.
After treatment with the positive control (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) the mean viability value was 1.25% (standard deviation: 2.51%) and, thus, lower than the historically established threshold of 3.26%.
The negative and positive control are acceptable as the difference compared with the historical data is minimal.

Variability of the Data:
The standard deviation between the three tissues replicates treated with the test item was 0.33% and, thus, ≤18%. The standard deviations between the three tissue replicates of the negative control and the positive control were 0.99% and 2.51%, respectively, and, thus, ≤18%.

The study met all acceptance criteria.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of Results

 Group Time / [min]  Mean OD  Mean Relative viability / [%]
 Negative Control 42  1.836 100.00 
 Positive Control 42

0.023

1.25

 Test Material

42

1.763

96.00

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the conducted test, the test substance did not show irritating properties towards reconstructed human epidermis tissue.