Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation (EU Method): not irritating

Eye irritation (EU Method): not irritating

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
No data available, ECHA provided study summaries migrated from the SNIF format.
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Annex V
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: Liquid substance was administered undiluted.
Amount / concentration applied:
500 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Number of animals:
3
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Reversibility of any observed effect: Changes fully reversible within 2 days
Other effects:
Grade 1 erythema was seen in one animal at 1 hour
Interpretation of results:
other: Not irritating
Remarks:
according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and its amendments.
Conclusions:
In an skin irritation study with rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles, very slight skin irritation (erythema) was observed in two animals and the effects were fully reversible within two days.
Executive summary:

RB68 was tested in a skin irritation/corrosion study with rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles.

Very slight skin irritation (erythema) was observed in two animals and the effects were fully reversible within two days.

RB68 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (including all amendments).

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
No data available, ECHA provided study summaries migrated from the SNIF format.
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Annex V
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Amount / concentration applied:
100 MG
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Reversibility of any observed effect: Changes fully reversible within 1 days
Other effects:
Grade 1 conjunctival redness was noted in all animals at 1 hour.
Interpretation of results:
other: Not irritating
Remarks:
according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 and its amendments.
Conclusions:
In an eye irritation study with rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles, no irritation was observed.
Executive summary:

RB68 was tested in an eye irritation/corrosion study with male rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles. No irritation was observed.

RB68 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (including all amendments).

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation:

RB68 was tested in a skin irritation/corrosion study with rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles.

Very slight skin irritation (erythema) was observed in two animals and the effects were fully reversible within two days.

Eye irritation:

RB68 was tested in an eye irritation/corrosion study with male rabbits, performed according to an EU Method and GLP principles. No irritation was observed.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the study results, RB68 does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for skin and eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (including all amendments).