Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A screening test was conducted where the sample was sieved through a 100 µm sieve for approximately 10 minutes and the mass of test material passing through the sieve was measured. For the definitive test, a cascade impactor was used to determine particle size. Too few particles with a size less than 10 µm were present to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
cascade impaction
Type of distribution:
other: Particle size distribution, fibre length and diameter distribution
No.:
#1
Size:
< 100 µm
Distribution:
12.56 %
No.:
#2
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
2.56 %

12.5% of the test material had a particle size < 100 µm. 2.56% of the test material had a particle size < 10 µm.

Conclusions:
12.5% of the test material had a particle size <100 µm. 2.56% of the test material had a particle size <10 µm. it was determined that too few particles were of a size <10 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter.
Executive summary:

This is a GLP compliant, guideline study considered suitable for use as the key study for this endpoint.12.5% of the test material had a particle size <100 µm. 2.56% of the test material had a particle size <10 µm. it was determined that too few particles were of a size <10 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter. 

Description of key information

12.5% of the test material had a particle size <100 µm. 2.56% of the test material had a particle size <10 µm. It was determined that too few particles were of a size <10 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter.  

Additional information

Woolley and Mullee (2004) is a GLP compliant study following OECD TG 110 and is considered suitable for use as the key study for this endpoint.12.5% of the test material had a particle size <100 µm. 2.56% of the test material had a particle size <10 µm. it was determined that too few particles were of a size <10 µm to allow accurate assessment of mass median aerodynamic diameter.