Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according EU/OECD guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
(2010)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-3-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-2-yl]methyl}-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid
EC Number:
936-882-7
Cas Number:
1352319-02-8
Molecular formula:
C12H7ClF3N7O2
IUPAC Name:
1-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)-3-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-2-yl]methyl}-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
Topical application: 10, 25 and 50% (w/v) in DMF
No. of animals per dose:
test group: 5 animals
control group: 5 animals

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
other: see below "Any other information on results incl. tables"
Remarks:
see below "Any other information on results incl. tables"
Test group / Remarks:
see below "Any other information on results incl. tables"
Remarks on result:
other: see below "Any other information on results incl. tables"
Remarks:
see below "Any other information on results incl. tables"

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Summary of LLNA results

Concentration (% in w/v) in DMF

dpm/node

Stimulation index

Result

Negative control

91.2

1.0

Negative

10

211.1

2.3**

Negative

25

139.6

1.5

Negative

50

198.2

2.2*

Negative

Positive control

1628.6

17.9**

Positive

* = Significant (p<0.05, Mann-Whitney U-test versus negative control)

** = Significant (p<0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test versus negative control)

dpm = disintegrations per minute

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
No mortality or systemic toxicity was observed during the study. There were no indications of any irritancy at the site of application. The calculated stimulation index values were 2.2, 1.5 and 2.3 at concentrations of 50, 25 and 10% (w/v), respectively. The resulted stimulation index values were below the threshold limit of 3 at each examined concentrations indicating that the test material is not a skin sensitizer. A significant lymphoproliferative response (stimulation index value of 17.9) was noted for the positive control group treated with α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde.