Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 629-754-4 | CAS number: 210988-99-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 August 2015 - 01 October 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The substance has an irritation potential and therefore the Bühler assay was considered better suitable.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N2-[6-({4,6-bis[butyl(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)amino)hexyl]-N4,N6-dibutyl-N2,N4,N6-tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine
- EC Number:
- 629-754-4
- Cas Number:
- 210988-99-1
- Molecular formula:
- C82 H156 N18
- IUPAC Name:
- N2-[6-({4,6-bis[butyl(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl}(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)amino)hexyl]-N4,N6-dibutyl-N2,N4,N6-tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Solid / white to beige
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: HARLAN, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 3 or 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: average weight of 269g
- Housing: in groups of 2 in polycarbonate containers
- Diet: SAFE 106, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22°C ± 3°C
- Humidity: 30 % to 70 %,
- Air changes: at least 10 cycles per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs day / 12 hrs darkness
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 50%
Challengeopen allclose all
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 50%
- No.:
- #2
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 25%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 in control and 20 in test group
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
A pre-test was performed to determine the maximal item concentration without risk of an irritant effect during the challenge phase. Three guinea pigs were treated with the test item placed onto the selected treatment sites and covered with an occlusive dressing for a period of 6 hours at 4 different concentrations: diluted at 50%, 25%, 10% and 5% in liquid paraffin. Washing of the skin after removal of the dressing was done with liquid paraffin for the site treated with the test item at 50%. Washing of the skin after removal of the dressing was not necessary for the other sites. The animals treated with the concentrations 50%, 25%, 10% and 5% received 0.5 mL of the corresponding preparation. A macroscopic evaluation of the cutaneous reactions was conducted 24 and 48 hours after removal of the occlusive dressings. 24 and 48 hours after removal of the patches, no cutaneous reaction was noted at all tested concentrations. In view of these results, the concentration selected was 50% for the 3 inductions of the main study and the concentration selected was 50% for the challenge phase.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 3 local applications on D0, D7 and D14 during 6 hours under occlusive dressing
- Test groups: The animals of the test group received 0.5 mL of 50% in liquid paraffin.
- Control group: The animals of the control group received 0.5 mL of liquid paraffin
- Site: scapular zone
- Concentrations: 50 %
Washing of the skin after removal of the dressing was done with liquid paraffin.
B. CHALLENGE AND RE-CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: two challenges
- Day(s) of challenge: D28 (challenge) and D35 (re-challenge)
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 0.5 mL of the test item diluted at 50% (25%) and 0.5 mL of liquid paraffin
- Control group: 0.5 mL of the test item diluted at 50% (25%) 0.5 mL of liquid paraffin
- Site: left flank (test item) and right flank (liquid paraffin)
- Concentrations: 50% (D28), 25% (D35)
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the dressing
Washing of the skin after removal of the dressing was done with liquid paraffin. - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- the sensitivity is periodically tested with α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, recent test reports are presented
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 20
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50%
- No. with + reactions:
- 6
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
Any other information on results incl. tables
Induction phase
No cutaneous reaction was recorded after the first and second induction in the treated group. Discrete erythema (grade 1) was noted in eighteen animals (18/20) and a moderate erythema (grade 2) was noted in two animals (2/20) after the third induction. No cutaneous reaction was recorded during the induction phase in the control group.
Challenge phase
In the treated group (treatment dose of 50%), it was recorded a slight to intense erythema (grade 1-3) in 100% (20/20) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the treated area. In the control group (associated with the treatment dose of 50%), it was recorded a slight to moderate erythema (grade 1-2) in 60% (6/10), 40% (4/10) and 30% (3/10) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the treated area. No cutaneous reaction was recorded in animals from the treated and control groups after the challenge phase, on the treated area with liquid paraffin (control item).
As irritation was observed in the control group animals, only reactions in the test group animals that exceeded the most severe reactions seen in the control group animals were attributed to skin sensitization. So, a sensitization reaction was noted in 60%, 50% and 20% of the animals from the treated group, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the area challenged with the test item at 50%.
Re-challenge phase
In the treated group (treatment dose of 25%), it was recorded a slight to intense erythema (grade 1-3) in 90% (18/20), 80% (16/20) and 15% (3/20) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the re-challenge phase, on the treated area. Additionally, 9 animals in total showed dryness of the skin. In the control group (associated with the treatment dose of 25%), it was recorded a slight to moderate
erythema (grade 1-2) in 70% (7/10), 50% (5/10) and 20% (2/10) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the re-challenge phase, on the treated area. Dryness of the skin was observed in 4 animals in total. No cutaneous reaction was recorded in animals from the treated and control groups after the re-challenge phase, on the treated area with liquid paraffin (control item).
As irritation was observed in the control group animals, only reactions in the test group animals that exceeded the most severe reactions seen in the control group animals were attributed to skin sensitization. So, a sensitization reaction was noted in 10%, 5% and 5% of the animals from the treated group, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the area challenged with the test item
at 25%.
Weight evolution
No abnormalities and no differences in the body weight between the control and the treated group were observed.
Mortality
No mortality was registered during the main test.
Clinical signs
No abnormal clinical signs related to the administration of the test item were observed.
ASSESSMENT OF THE SENSITISING POTENTIAL
1st CHALLENGE
Groups | Reading Time | Concentrations | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | % of positive responses ≥ 1 | % of animal sensitized |
Control group | 24 h | 50% | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 60% | |
48 h | 50% | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 40% | ||
72 h | 50% | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 30% | ||
24 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
48 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
72 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
Treated Group | 24 h | 50% | 0 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 100% | 60% |
48 h | 50% | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 100% | 50% | |
72 h | 50% | 0 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 100% | 20% | |
24 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
48 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
72 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
RE-CHALLENGE
Groups | Reading Time | Concentrations | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | % of positive responses ≥ 1 | % of animal sensitized |
Control group | 24 h | 25% | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 70% | |
48 h | 25% | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 50% | ||
72 h | 25% | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20% | ||
24 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
48 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
72 h | 0% | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
Treated Group | 24 h | 25% | 2 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 90% | 10% |
48 h | 25% | 4 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 80% | 5% | |
72 h | 25% | 17 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15% | 5% | |
24 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
48 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | |
72 h | 0% | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered as a skin sensitizer, taking into account the result of the 1st challenge.
- Executive summary:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible allergenic activity of the test item after topical administration in guinea pigs. After induction of 20 guinea-pigs by 3 topical applications with the test item applied diluted at 50% in liquid paraffin under occlusive dressing and a 13-day rest phase, the challenge phase, under occlusive dressing for 6 hours, consisted of a single topical application of the test item diluted at 50% in liquid paraffin and of a negative control (liquid paraffin). The experimental protocol was established from the O.E.C.D. Test Guideline No.406 dated July 17th, 1992, and the method B.6 of the Council regulation No. 440/2008 and EPA.
The concentrations selected for the induction phase and the challenge phase were based on the results of a pre-test. In the treated group (treatment dose of 50%), it was recorded a slight to intense erythema in 100% (20/20) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the treated area. In the control group (associated with the treatment dose of 50%), it was recorded a slight to moderate erythema in 60% (6/10), 40% (4/10) and 30% (3/10) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the treated area. No cutaneous reaction was recorded in animals from the treated and control groups after the challenge phase, on the treated area with liquid paraffin (control item).
As irritation was observed in the control group animals, only reactions in the test group animals that exceeded the most severe reactions seen in the control group animals were attributed to skin sensitization. So, a sensitization reaction was noted in 60%, 50% and 20% of the animals from the treated group, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the area challenged with the test item at 50%. The severity of the reactions were 2.5, 2.45 and 2.15 in the treated group versus 0.8, 0.5 and 0.4 in the control group 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, respectively.
To confirm the results obtained with the test item, a second challenge phase (re-challenge) was performed with the test item diluted at 25% in liquid paraffin after a 6 day rest phase. In the treated group (treatment dose of 25%), it was recorded a slight to intense erythema in 90% (18/20), 80% (16/20) and 15% (3/20) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the re-challenge phase, on
the treated area. Additionally, 9 animals in total showed dryness of the skin. In the control group (associated with the treatment dose of 25%), it was recorded a slight to moderate erythema in 70% (7/10), 50% (5/10) and 20% (2/10) of the animals, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the re-challenge phase, on the treated area. Dryness of the skin was observed in 4 animals in total. No cutaneous reaction was recorded in animals from the treated and control groups after the challenge phase, on the treated area with liquid paraffin (control item). As irritation was observed in the control group animals, only reactions in the test group animals that exceeded the most severe reactions seen in the control group animals were attributed to skin sensitization. So, a sensitization reaction was noted in 10%, 5% and 5% of the animals from the treated group, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, on the area challenged with the test item
at 25%. The severity of the reactions were 1.65, 1.0 and 0.2 in the treated group versus 1.0, 0.7 and 0.2 in the control group 24, 48 and 72 hours after the challenge phase, respectively. In conclusion, the test item was considered to be a skin sensitizer, taking into account the result of the 1st challenge.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.