Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 254-400-7 | CAS number: 39290-78-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 - 11 March 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Well conducted and well described study in accordance with GLP and OECD Guideline 471 without any deviation.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid - liquid: aqueous solution
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Clear colourless liquid (determined at NOTOX)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 18 December 2010 (allocated by NOTOX, 1 year after receipt of the test substance)
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark
- Stability under storage conditions: Stable
- Other:
Density: 1.189 kg/L at 21°C
pH: 3.0 ± 0.5% (20°C)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- S. typhimurium: Histidine gene
E. coli: Tryptophan gene
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 5 and 10% (v/v) S9-fraction; Rat liver S9-mix induced by a combination of phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1:
Dose range finding test: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, without and with S9 in TA100 and WP2uvrA
Main test:
Experiment 1: 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, without and with 5% (v/v) S9-mix in TA1535, TA1537 and TA98
Experiment 2: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate without and with 10% (v/v) S9-mix in TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Water.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Test compound was soluble in water and water has been accepted and approved by authorities and international guidelines.
Test substance preparation: The test substance was dissolved in Milli-Q water (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA., USA). The stock solution was filter (0.22 μm)-sterilized. Test substance concentrations were used within 3 hours after preparation.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Milli-Q water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Milli-Q water
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM: Salmonella typhimurium strains were obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Germany (Master culture from Dr. Bruce N. Ames); Escherichia coli strain was obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Germany (Master culture from The National Collections of Industrial and Marine Bacteria, Aberdeen, UK).
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: Treated plates were inverted and incubated in the dark at 37 ± 1 °C 48 ± 4 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
Triplicate plates per dose level for test substance, vehicle and positive controls
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The reduction of the bacterial background lawn, the increase in the size of the microcolonies and the reduction of the revertant colonies. The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated, both macroscopically and microscopically by using a dissecting microscope.
OTHERS
Colony counting: The revertant colonies (histidine independent or tryptophan independent) were counted manually if less than 40 colonies per plate were present. If more than 40 colonies were present, these could be counted automatically with a Biocount 4000 Pro-S-colony counter. Plates with abundant test article precipitate which interfered with automated colony counting were counted manually and the evidence of test substance precipitate on the plates was recorded. The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated, both macroscopically and microscopically by using a dissecting microscope. - Rationale for test conditions:
- Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on a dose range finding test with the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA, both with and without 5% (v/v) S9-mix.
- Evaluation criteria:
- No formal hypothesis testing was done.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.
b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.
The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the final evaluation decision.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation was observed up to and including the top dose of 5000 μg/plate
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- No reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed at up to 5000 μg/plate in TA100 and WP2uvrA strains.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- The negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Experiment 1: In the absence of S9-mix, cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease or total absence in the number of revertants, was observed in all three tester strains at test substance concentrations of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate. In the presence of S9-mix, cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was only observed in tester strain TA1537 at test substance concentrations of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate.
Experiment 2: In the absence of S9-mix,cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a total absence of revertant colonies, was observed in the tester strains TA1537 and TA98 at test substance concentrations of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate. A decrease in the number of revertants less than the minimal value of the historical control data range was observed in tester strain TA1535 at the test substance concentration of 5000 μg/plate. In the presence of S9-mix, cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants, was only observed in tester strain TA1537 at the test substance concentrations of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate.
In tester strain TA100 in the presence of S9-mix, fluctuations in the number of revertant colonies below the laboratory historical control data range were observed. However, since no dose relationship was observed, the reductions are not considered to be caused by toxicity of the test substance.
Any other information on results incl. tables
None
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, test substance is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E. coli WP2 uvr A strains.
- Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, performed according to the OECD Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and Escherichia coli WP2 uvr A strains were exposed to test substance at the following concentrations using plate incorporation method:
Experiment 1:
Dose range finding test: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, without and with S9 in TA100 and WP2uvrA
Main test:
Experiment 1: 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate, without and with 5% (v/v) S9-mix in TA1535, TA1537 and TA98
Experiment 2: 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 μg/plate without and with 10% (v/v) S9-mix in TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 and WP2uvrA
Metabolic activation system used in this test 5 and 10 % S9 mix; S9 fraction prepared from liver homogenates of male Wistar rats induced with phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone. Vehicle and positive control groups were also included in mutagenicity tests.
In the dose range finding test, no precipitation was observed up to the top dose of 5000 μg/plate in the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA. The bacterial background lawn was not reduced at any of the concentrations tested and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants was observed. Results of this dose range finding test were reported as part of the first experiment of the mutation assay. In main tests, cytotoxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants or total absence of revertants, was observed in TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 strains in the absence of S9-mix and in tester strain TA1537 in the presence of S9-mix at test substance concentrations of 3330 and 5000 μg/plate.
Test substance did not induce a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertant (His+) colonies in each of the four tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and in the number of revertant (Trp+) colonies in tester strain WP2uvrA both in the absence and presence of S9-metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment.
In this study, the negative and strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Under the test conditions, test substance is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100) and E. coli WP2 uvr A strains.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)
Although ECHA is providing a lot of online material in your language, part of this page is only in English. More about ECHA’s multilingual practice.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
the-echa-website-uses-cookies
find-out-more-on how-we-use-cookies