Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 474-870-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Start of experimental phase (ERBC): First allocation of animals to groups 13 October 2020 Start of experimental phase 02 December 2020 (first date of sample arrival at the Test Site) End of delegate phase (date PI signed the GLP statement) 31March 2021
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2021
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 474-870-9
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 80156-97-4
- Molecular formula:
- Hill formula: C28H20ClN9Na4O16S5 CAS formula: C28H24ClN9O16S5.4Na
- IUPAC Name:
- tetrasodium 7-[(1E)-2-[2-(carbamoylamino)-4-{[4-chloro-6-({4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}amino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino}phenyl]diazen-1-yl]naphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Batch No. LK2003715
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The Sprague Dawley rat was the species and strain of choice because it is accepted by many
regulatory authorities and there are ample experience and background data on this species
and strain.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- softened by reverse osmosis
- Details on exposure:
- The test item was administered orally, by gavage. The oral route was selected as it is a possible route of exposure of the test item in man.
The dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000mg/kg bw/day were selected by the Sponsor based on information from previous studies. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Samples of the preparations prepared during the first and last week of treatment of the current study were analysed to check the concentration. Final results for all levels were within the acceptability limits for concentration (90-110%).
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analysis was performed in a separate study in order to validate the analytical method and the preparation procedure and to verify the stability of the preparations (ERBC Study no. A4042). The stability of the preparations at 5 to 100mg/mL was assessed at:
– for 28 hours at room temperature;
– for 10 days at +2-8°C.
Samples of the preparations prepared during the first and last week of treatment of the current study were analysed to check the concentration.
Chemical analysis was carried out by the Analytical Chemistry Department. Results of preparation analyses are presented in Addendum 3 of this report. Final results for all levels were within the acceptability limits stated in ERBC SOPs for concentration (90-110%).
The validated software used for this activity was SkanIt version 6.0.0.44. - Details on mating procedure:
- The females were paired with male rats. Females were paired 1 to 1 in the home cage of the male and left overnight. Allocation was performed to prevent any stock male from providing more than one mated female in each treated group, except on two occasions.
Vaginal smears were taken daily in the morning from the day after pairing until a positive identification of mating was made. The day of mating, as judged by the presence of sperm in the vaginal smear or by the presence of a copulation plug, was considered as Day 0 of gestation (or Day 0 post coitum). Full mating records will be maintained. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Daily from Day 3 to Day 19 post coitum
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- 20 days, with 17 days of treatment
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Control group
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 2
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 3
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 4
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Each group comprised 25 mated female rats.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Animal management
Animal supply and acclimatisation
A total of 130 Sprague Dawley virgin female rats, 9 weeks old (209 to 226 g) were received from Charles River Italia S.p.A., Calco (Lecco), Italy. The male rats used were from the same supplier, and were at least 11 weeks old (at least 340 g). Mating of siblings was avoided. After arrival the weight range was determined and the females were uniquely identified by tattoo on the hind feet. A health check was then performed by a veterinarian. An acclimatisation period of 23 days was allowed before the start of treatment, during which time the health status of the animals was assessed by thorough observations.
Animal husbandry
The animals were housed in a limited access rodent facility. Animal room controls were set to maintain temperature and relative humidity at 22°C±2°C and 55%±15% respectively; actual conditions were monitored, recorded and the records retained. No relevant deviations from these ranges were recorded during the study. There were approximately 15 to 20 air changes per hour and the rooms were lit by artificial light for 12 hours each day. Before and after the pairing period, the animals were housed no more than 5 of one sex in polysulfone solid bottomed cages, measuring 59.5×38×20cm (Tecniplast Gazzada S.a.r.l., Buguggiate, Varese). Nesting material was provided inside suitable bedding bags and changed at least twice a week. In addition, suitable nesting material (Scobis 0 Mucedola) was provided as necessary. Nesting material was changed at least 2 times a week. During the pairing period, the rats were housed on the basis of 1 male to 1 female in clear polysulfone cages measuring 42.5×26.6×18.5cm with a stainless steel mesh lid and floor (Tecniplast Gazzada S.a.r.l., Buguggiate, Varese). Each cage tray held absorbent material which was inspected and changed daily. Drinking water was supplied ad libitum to each cage via water bottles. A commercially available laboratory rodent diet (4 RF 21, Mucedola S.r.l., Via G. Galilei, 4, 20019 Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy) with certified dietary levels of phytooestrogen (genistein level of 124mg/kg) was offered ad libitum throughout the study. There was no information available to indicate that any non-nutrient substance likely to influence the effect of the test item was present in the drinking water or the diet. Records of analyses of water and diet are kept on file at ERBC. Dated and signed records of activities relating to the day to day running and maintenance of the study in the animal house were recorded.
Allocation to groups
On the day of allocation (Day 0 post coitum) all females were weighed and allocated to the groups by computerised stratified randomisation to give approximately equal initial group mean body weights. Each female was identified within the study by ear notch and housed no more than 5 to a cage. The cages were identified by a label recording the study number, animal numbers and details of treatment. The arrangement of cages in batteries was such that cages from each treatment group were evenly distributed across the battery to minimise possible environmental effects.
Administration of test item
The test item was administered orally by gavage at a dose volume of 10mL/kg body weight. Control animals received the vehicle alone at the same dose volume. The dose was administered to each animal on the basis of the most recently recorded body weight and the volume administered was recorded for each animal.
Duration of treatment
All animals were dosed once a day from Day 3 through Day 19 post coitum. Caesarean section was done on Day 20 post coitum.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Mortality
Throughout the study, all animals were checked early in each working day and again in the afternoon. At weekends and Public Holidays a similar procedure was followed except that the final check was carried out at approximately mid-day. A complete necropsy was performed in all cases.
Clinical signs
All clinical signs were recorded for individual animals. Each animal was observed at least once daily and any clinical signs recorded from allocation until sacrifice.
Observations of the cage tray
Observations of the cage tray was performed daily starting from Day 8 post coitum until termination.
Body weight
All animals were weighed on Days 0, 3, 5, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 20 post coitum.
Food consumption
Food consumption was measured on Days 3, 5, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 20 post coitum starting from Day 0 post coitum.
Clinical pathology investigations - Dams
Blood collection - Thyroid hormone determination (T3, T4 and TSH)
Blood collection by random selection (order of collection equalised between groups) was performed, for hormone determination, from all females at termination, on Day 20 post coitum. Blood samples (approximately 0.8 mL) for hormone determination were withdrawn from the sublingual vein under light isoflurane anaesthesia.
Terminal studies
Euthanasia
The animals were killed on Day 20 post coitum and necropsied as detailed below. Animals
were euthanised with carbon dioxide and subjected to necropsy, supervised by a pathologist.
All foetuses were sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of Sodium Thiopental followed by
hypothermia.
Necropsy - Dams
The clinical history of the animal was studied and a detailed post mortem examination was
conducted (including examination of the external surface and orifices). The evaluation of the dams during necropsy procedures was performed applying the randomization across treatment groups.
Organ weight - Dams
From all females completing the scheduled test period, the organs were dissected free of fat and weighed. The ratios of organ weight to brain weight was calculated for each animal. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries were examined to determine:
– number of corpora lutea
The uteri and their content were examined to determine:
– Gravid uterine weight, including the cervix;
– number of implantation sites;
– number, sex and weight of all live foetuses;
– number of intra-uterine deaths;
– gross evaluation of placentae;
– internal foetal sex determination in each foetuses allocated to the skeletal examination;
– anogenital distance (AGD) in all live foetuses
Intra-uterine deaths were classified as:
– Early resorptions: only placental remnants visible.
– Late resorptions: placental and foetal remnants visible.
Uteri or individual uterine horns without visible implantations were immersed in a 20% solution of ammonium sulphide to reveal evidence of embryonic death at very early stages of implantation. - Fetal examinations:
- Examination of foetuses
All live foetuses were examined externally. Approximately one-half of the foetuses (i.e., routinely, every second live foetus) in each litter was preserved in Bouin’s solution for subsequent fixed-visceral examination. The remaining foetuses were eviscerated after which the carcasses were fixed in 95% (v/v) ethanol for subsequent skeletal examination.
Skeletal and fixed-visceral examinations were performed in all groups.
Structural deviation were classified as follows:
Malformations: Major abnormalities that are rare and/or affect the survival or health of the species under investigation.
Anomalies: Minor abnormalities that are detected relatively frequently.
Variants: A change that occurs within the normal population under investigation and is unlikely to adversely affect survival or health. This might include a delay in growth or morphogenesis that would have otherwise followed a normal pattern of development. - Statistics:
- For continuous variables the significance of the differences amongst group means was
assessed by Dunnett’s test or a modified t test, depending on the homogeneity of data.
Statistical analysis of non-continuous variables was carried out by means of the Kruskal-
Wallis test and intergroup differences between the control and treated groups assessed by a
non-parametric version of theWilliams test. The criterion for statistical significance was
p<0.05. The mean values, standard deviations and statistical analysis were calculated from
the actual values in the computer without rounding off. - Indices:
- Pre-implantation loss was calculated as a percentage from the formula:
Pre impl. Loss% = no. of corpora lutea−no. of implantations/no. of corpora lutea×100
Post-implantation loss was calculated as a percentage from the formula:
Post impl. Loss% = no. of implantations−no. of live foetuses/no. of implantations×100
Total implantation loss was calculated as a percentage from the formula:
Total impl. Loss% = no. of corpora lutea−no. of live foetuses/no. of corpora lutea×100
Sex ratios of the foetuses were calculated as the percentage of males per litter.
Anogenital distance (AGD): The AGD of each live foetuses was measured on Day 20 post
coitum. The AGD was normalized to the cube root of body weight collected on Day 20 post
coitum.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs were recorded.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No mortality of females occurred during the study.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant changes in bodyweight/bodyweight gain were seen between groups throughout
the study. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption was comparable between groups.
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related changes were noted in thyroids as well as all abnormalities.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No changes were observed in brain and thyroid weight of treated animals, when compared
to the controls. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment-related macroscopic observation, consisted of yellow colour of the placenta,
observed in most of high dose females. This finding was considered due to the colour of
the test item. - Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Thyroid hormone determination
Anogenital distance - Details on results:
- Thyroid hormone determination: The serum levels of T3, T4 and TSH did not differ between treated and control groups.
Anogenital distance: Anogenital distance (AGD): The AGD of each live foetuses was measured on Day 20 post
coitum. The AGD was normalized to the cube root of body weight collected on Day 20 post
coitum.
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All females were sacrificed at termination and were found pregnant with the exception of
two females (one at 100 mg/kg bw/day and one at 300 mg/kg bw/day).
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Anogenital distance of all rodent fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Compared to the control, no alterations were seen in the anogenital distance performed in
foetuses maternally exposed to the test item. - Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related findings were seen at external examination of foetuses.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Treatment with the test item Reactive Yellow 176 did not cause maternal toxicity and did not reveal teratogenic potential up to and including the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on the results obtained in the study, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level)
for maternal and developmental toxicity is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day or above. - Executive summary:
The effects of Reactive Yellow 176 were investigated after oral administration in female rats during pregnancy and on embryo-foetal development.
Females were mated with sexually mature males of the same strain and then assigned to 4 groups of 25 females each.
All females were administered by oral gavage during the gestation period from Day 3 through Day 19 post coitum at 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day and 10 mL/kg body weight as the dose volume. The day of mating, as judged by the presence of sperm in the vaginal smear or by the presence of a copulation plug, was considered as Day 0 of gestation. Control females received the vehicle (water, softened by reverse osmosis) at the same dose volume during the same treatment period.
Mortality check, clinical signs, body weight and food consumption were recorded during the in vivo phase. Before despatch to necropsy (Day 20 post coitum), blood samples were collected for hormones determination of T3, T4 and TSH. At term, females were caesarean sectioned on Day 20 post coitum and subjected to detailed post mortem examination.
The thyroid and brain were weighed and preserved in fixative. Thyroid was examined histopathologically. Gravid uterus was weighed and the uterine content examined for the number of implantations sites, intrauterine deaths and live foetuses. The ovaries were also examined and the corpora lutea counted. Live foetuses were weighed, sexed and observed for external abnormalities. After killing the foetuses were then processed for skeletal and fixed visceral examinations.No mortality of females occurred during the study.
All females were sacrificed at termination and were found pregnant with the exception of two females (one at 100 mg/kg bw/day and one at 300 mg/kg bw/day). The final number of pregnant females on Day 20 post coitum was 25 in the control group, 24 in low- (100 mg/kg bw/day) and mid-dose levels (300 mg/kg bw/day) and 25 in the high dose group (1000 mg/kg bw/day).
No treatment-related clinical signs were recorded. No significant changes in bodyweight or bodyweight gain were seen between groups throughout the study. Food consumption was comparable between groups.The serum levels of T3, T4 and TSH did not differ between treated and control groups.
Body weight at termination, uterus weight and the absolute weight gain of females were unaffected by treatment. Caesarian section data, litter data and sex ratios were unaffected by treatment. Compared to the control, no alterations were seen in the anogenital distance performed in foetuses maternally exposed to the test item.No changes were observed in brain and thyroid weight of treated animals, when compared to the controls. Treatment-related macroscopic observation, consisted of yellow colour of the placenta, observed in most of high dose females. This finding was considered due to the colour of the test item.
No treatment-related changes were noted in thyroids as well as all abnormalities during histophathological examination.
No treatment-related findings were recorded at external, visceral or skeletal examination of foetuses.In conclusion, treatment with the test item Reactive Yellow 176 did not cause maternal toxicity and did not reveal teratogenic potential up to and including the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on the results obtained in the study, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for maternal and developmental toxicity is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day or above.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.