Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
401-540-3
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
84632-65-5
Molecular formula:
C18H10Cl2N2O2
IUPAC Name:
3,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1H,2H,4H,5H-pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: A01297 (Cinilex DPP RED SR1C)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: -
- Purity test date: -

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room tempreature in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan UK Limited, Bicester, Oxon, UK
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 -25 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15/h
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
5%, 10% or 25% w/w in acetone/olive oil 4:1
No. of animals per dose:
4

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.99
Test group / Remarks:
5%
Parameter:
SI
Test group / Remarks:
10%
Remarks on result:
other: no results due to accidential spillage of pooled lymph node cell suspension
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.13
Test group / Remarks:
25%
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: vehicle: 7694.44 5%: 7593.42 25% 8718.31

Any other information on results incl. tables

Due to accidental spillage of the single cell suspension of pooled lymph node cells for the group treated with the test material at a concentration of 10%, the results obtained cannot be verified as being accurate. For this reason the results for the 10% group were not used for reporting purposes. This was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In a GLP-study according to OECD test guideline 429 (LLNA), the substance was not skin sensitising.
Executive summary:

A study was performed to assess the skin sensitisation potential of the test material in the CBA/Ca strain mouse following topical application to the dorsal surface of the ear.

Following a preliminary screening test, three groups, each of four animals, were treated with 50 p.1 (25 p1 per ear) of the test material as a suspension in acetone/olive oil 4:1 at concentrations of 5%, 10% or 25% w/w. A further group of four animals was treated with acetone/olive oil 4:1 alone.

Due to accidental spillage of the single cell suspension of pooled lymph node cells for the group treated with the test material at a concentration of 10%, the results obtained cannot be verified as being accurate. For this reason the results for the 10% group were not used for reporting purposes. This was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

Simulation Indexes for 5% and 25 % were 0.99 and 1.13, respectively. Therefore, the test material was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test.