Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from 1993-09-09 to 1994-01-14
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP, OCDE guideline 406 (1981 May the 12th)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Centre d'élevage Lebeau, 78950 Gambais, France
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 399+/-28g (Males), 391+/-39g (Females)
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum "Guinea pig sustenance reference 106 diet" (U.A.R., 91360 Villmoisson-sur-Orge, France)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water filtered by a F.G. Milliporemembrane 0,22µ)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the beginning of the study


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22+/-3°C
- Humidity (%): 50+/-20%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 1993-10-08
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
intradermal induction phase: 1%
cutaneous induction phase: 25%
challenge phase: 10%
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
intradermal induction phase: 1%
cutaneous induction phase: 25%
challenge phase: 10%
No. of animals per dose:
control group: 10 animals (5 Males + 5 Females)
treated group: 20 animals (10 Males + 10 Females)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Determination of the Minimum Irritant Concentration by intradermal route at increasing concentrations (1%, 10%, 25%). Result: MIC=1%
Determination of the Minimum Irritant Concentration (MIC) and the Maximal Non Irritant Concentration (MNIC) by cutaneous route at increasing concentrations (5%, 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%). Result: MIC= 25%, MNIC=10%.


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE

Intradermal induction D1
3injections on the scapular area:
. 0.1mL of Freund's complete adjuvant 50% in 0.9% NaCl
. 0.1mL of the test item 0.1% in water (treated group) or vehicle (control group)
. 0.1mL of a mixture 50/50 (V/V) of Freund complete adjuvant 50% in 0.9% NaCl and vehicle (for control group) or test item 1% in vehicle (for treated group)

Cutaneous induction D8
. On day 7, the irritation created with the application of sodium Laurylsulfate 10% in vaseline.
. On day 8, occlusive application on the scapular area of 0.5mL of the test item 25% (for treated group) or vehicle (for control group) for 48hours.


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE D22
On day 22, 24-hour occlusive application on the scapular area of 0.5mL of the test item 10% on the right flank and 0.5mL of the vehicle on the left flank.
Reactions are evaluated 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Dinitro 2,4 Chlorobenzene: Positive result in recent study (July 1993- CIT/Study No. 10829 TPG) on 5 females. Induction: test substance injected intradermally 0.05% (d1) and applied cutaneously 0.5% (d8) concentration. Challenge: 0,1% r flank 0.5% l flank
Positive control substance(s):
other: Dinitro 2,4 chlorobenzene
Statistics:
no
Positive control results:
Positive skin sensitization reactions in 5/5 female Guinea pigs (July 1993- CIT/Study No. 10829 TPG).
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No erythema/oedema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No erythema/oedema.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No erythema/oedema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: No erythema/oedema.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
well defined erythema/no oedema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0. Clinical observations: well defined erythema/no oedema.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
19
Clinical observations:
well defined erythema/no oedema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10%. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0. Clinical observations: well defined erythema/no oedema.

Group

Sex

Animal

24h

48h

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

RF

LF

RF

LF

RF

LF

RF

LF

Control

M

21

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

22

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

23

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

24

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

25

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Control

F

36

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

37

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

38

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

39

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

40

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Treated

M

26

0

2

0

0

0

2/S

0

0

27

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

28

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

29

0

2

0

0

0

2/S

0

0

30

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

31

0

2

0

0

0

1/S

0

0

32

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

33

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

34

0

1

0

0

0

1/S

0

0

35

0

1

0

0

0

1/S

0

0

 

Treated

F

41

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

42

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

43

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

44

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

45

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

46

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

47

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

48

0

2

0

0

0

1/S

0

0

49

0

2

0

0

0

1/S

0

0

50

0

3

0

0

0

3/S

0

0

 S=Skin dryness

Interpretation of results:
other: Sensitiser cat. 1B
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
DIMETHYLDIPROPYLENETRIAMINE induced positive skin sensitization cutaneous reactions in 6/19 (32%) guinea pigs. The allergenicity level of the test substance was moderate (III) in guinea-pigs.
Executive summary:

The delayed contact hypersensivity of dimethyldipropylenetriamine (DMAPAPA) was evaluated in Guinea pigs according to OECD N°406 guideline (Magnusson and Kligman test). The induction phase has been realized both by intradermal route on day 1 (DMAPAPA 1% in vehicle) and by cutaneous route on day 8 (DMAPAPA 25%) in 2 groups of guinea pigs: 5 males and 5 females for control group and 10 males and 10 females for treated group. The challenge phase was realized on day 22 by cutaneous application of DMAPAPA 10%; the cutaneous reactions were scored 24 and 48 hours after the challenge phase. Only one female of the treated group died on day 9 but this death was not considered to be treatment-related. No cutaneous reaction was observed in the animals of the control group. In the treated group, inconclusive evidence of sensitisation skin reactions (very slight erythema: score of 1) were noted in 6/19 animals after 24 hours. Positive response characterised by a well defined and moderate erythema (scores of 2 and 3) were noted in 6/19 animals after 24 hours. In addition, a dryness of the skin was noted after 48 hours in 8/19 animals.

No oedema was noted. In conclusion, the allergenicity level of Dimethyldipropylenetriamine was moderate (III) in guinea pigs.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

The delayed contact hypersensivity of N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine (DMAPAPA) was evaluated in Guinea pigs according to OECD N°406 guideline (Magnusson and Kligman test) (Clouzeau, 1994). The induction phase has been realized both by intradermal route on day 1 (DMAPAPA 1% in vehicle) and by cutaneous route on day 8 (DMAPAPA 25%) in 2 groups of guinea pigs: 5 males and 5 females for control group and 10 males and 10 females for treated group. The challenge phase was realized on day 22 by cutaneous application of DMAPAPA 10%; the cutaneous reactions were scored 24 and 48 hours after the challenge phase. Only one female of the treated group died on day 9 but this death was not considered to be treatment-related. No cutaneous reaction was observed in the animals of the control group. In the treated group, inconclusive evidence of sensitisation skin reactions (very slight erythema: score of 1) were noted in 6/19 animals after 24 hours. Positive response characterised by a well defined and moderate erythema (scores of 2 and 3) were noted in 6/19 animals after 24 hours. In addition, a dryness of the skin was noted after 48 hours in 8/19 animals. No oedema was noted. In conclusion, the allergenicity level of N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine was moderate (III) in guinea pigs.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine induced skin sensitization cutaneous reactions in 6/19 (32%) guinea pigs. The allergenicity level of the test substance was moderate (III) in guinea-pigs.

Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
Key study

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Skin sensitization:

In a test performed following theGPMT's method, 32% of the guinea pigs reacted to an induction concentration of 1% N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine. On the basis of this study and in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine was classified as skin sensitizer category 1B (Hazard statement H317; May cause an allergic skin reaction) and in accordance with Annex VI of Commission Directive 2001/59/EC, N'-(3-aminopropyl) -N, N-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine was classified as irritant with the symbol Xi and the phrase R43 ‘May cause sensitisation by skin contact’.