Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute oral toxicity studies are available in the rat and mouse; an early acute dermal toxicity study is also available in the rat.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
31 January 1985 to 26 February 1985
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The test material was probably administered, at various concentrations in peanut oil, as the technical grade material but no information was available to confirm purity.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Standard limit test according to OECD 401
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: A Tuck & Sons Ltd, Essex, UK
- Age at study initiation: 4-6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 119-148g males and 118-148g females
- Fasting period before study: yes, overnight unti 2 hours aftre dosing
- Housing: groups of five by se in polypropylene cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):Rat & Mouse Expanded No.1, supplied by SDS Witham, Essex; ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum access to tap water
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-24
- Humidity (%): 40-55%
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 31 January 1985 To: 26 February 1985
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: For range finding test - 20, 100, 200, 300 and 400 mg/ml and for the main study 400 mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): dose volume was 5 mL/kg bw
- Justification for choice of vehicle: arachis oil used basd on suitability during range-finding investigations

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 5 mL/kg

DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): prepared freshly for each dose administration
Doses:
range-finder: 100, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 mg/kg bw

main study: 2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
2 in range finder; 5 in main study
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: frequent hourly observations on day of dosing; daily checks thereafter; bodyweights recorded on days 0, 7 and 14
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Statistics:
Not required
Preliminary study:
The range finding investigation revealed no mortalities in the dose range 100 to 2000 mg/kg bw. Hunched posture, lethargy, decreased respiratory rate and piloerection were frequently observed in the range-finder groups but the signs and severity of clinical response showed no treatment relationship. Recovery from systemic effects was complete within three days for all groups.
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: No deaths at the limit dose
Mortality:
There were no deaths in the main study, following dosing at 2000 mg/kg bw.
Clinical signs:
other: Hunched posture, lethargy, piloerection, ptosis and a decreased respiratory rate were commonly observed shortly after dosing with infrequent cases of body tremors also noted. Recovery from all signs was complete by Day 4.
Gross pathology:
Macroscopic examination at necropsy revealed congested lungs for one rat (normally an agonal response) and pale areas on the gastric glandular region for one rat. No other macroscopic abnormalities were apparent.
Other findings:
No data
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The acute oral LD50 for benzylbenzoate was greater than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats.
Executive summary:

In a standard acute oral study in rats, in accordance with test guideline OECD 401, groups of five male and female rats were dosed at 2000 mg/kg bw. Clinical signs including hunched posture, decreased respiratory rate, lethargy, ptosis and pilo-erection were apparent shortly after dosing but recovered within 4 days. The acute oral median lethal dose for benzylbenzoate was greater than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
Reliable rat study supported by data in the mouse

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Published study with limited details relating to methods. Study pre-dates adoption of regulatory test guidelines.
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Screening test
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
other: Draize primary skin irritation screening test
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No details provided
Type of coverage:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
No details provided for method of application
Duration of exposure:
Not specified in publication, normal exposure period in Draize method is 4 hours.
Doses:
2.0 mL/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
No data
Control animals:
not specified
Statistics:
No data
Preliminary study:
No information
Key result
Sex:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 mL/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: No deaths occurred
Mortality:
No mortality in skin irritation tests.
Benzyl benzoate displays a toxic threshold with a sharp demarcation at circa 2.0 mL/kg bw. Delayed deaths occurred following a single high dose topical application. Animals that died exhibited no clinical signs prior to death.
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity observed
Gross pathology:
no data
Other findings:
no data
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The acute dermal LD50 of benzyl benzoate was found to be >2 mL/kg bw (~2000 mg/kg bw) under the conditions of this assay.
Executive summary:

The acute dermal LD50 of benzyl benzoate was investigated in a screening assay in the rabbit and was found to be >2 mL/kg bw (~2000 mg/kg bw).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
Non-standard screening study in the rabbit

Additional information

Benzyl benzoate is shown to be of low acute toxicity by the oral and dermal routes. The acute oral LD50 of benzyl benzoate was reported to be >2000 mg/kg bw in the rat (Collier & Hewitt, 1985); an acute oral LD50 of 3253 mg/kg bw is reported in the mouse (Hoffman, 1972). Draize et al (1947) report an acute dermal LD50 value of >2 mL mg/kg bw (~2000 mg/kg bw) in a screening study performed in the rabbit.


 


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Regulatory limit test according to OECD 401, in the preferred species

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study available for this endpoint

Justification for classification or non-classification

No classification is required for acute oral and dermal toxicity according to the CLP Regulation.


Benzyl benzoate harmonised classification according to CLP Regulation 1272/2008 is Acute Tox 4, H302. The interpretation reflects the agreed classification rather than the observed experimental results.