Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

3,9-Di-3-cyclohexen-1-yl-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undecane was administered by gavage to 5 male and 5 female Wistar rats per dose group in daily doses of 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg body weight for 29 days. 
The animals were regularly observed and weighed and food and water intakes were determined. In addition, clinical pathology of blood samples was performed. Organs and tissues were subjected to gross and histopathological investigation. Functional observational battery (FOB) and motor and locomotor activity measurements (MA/LMA) were done.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
300 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
The materials/methods and results are described in detail und are sufficient for evaluation

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL=NOEL) for 3,9-Di-3-cyclohexen-1-yl-2,4,8,10- tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undecane is set at 300 mg/kg based on effects on body weight development and food consumption (males) at 1000 mg/kg.

Justification for classification or non-classification

None of the animals died during the study and no severe functional or morphological changes were observed. Therefore a classification is not justified.