Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-320-2 | CAS number: 24748-23-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April - May 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well conducted study according to GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 429-320-2
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 24748-23-0
- Molecular formula:
- C12H24O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 3,6,9-triethyl-3,6,9-trimethyl-1,2,4,5,7,8-hexaoxonane
- Details on test material:
- Batch no.: 1400-005
Stored from 14-20 March 1997 at ca. 25 degr. C, thereafter at ca. 4 degrc. C.
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- bacteria, other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, 100, 1535, 1537 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA-
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9 mix.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Concentration range in the main test (with and without metabolic activation): 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: acetone
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: ENNG, 9-AA, 4-NQO
- Remarks:
- without S9-Mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9-mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Five concentrations of the test material were assayed in triplicate against
each tester strain, using the direct plate incorporation method in
accordance with the standard methods for mutagenicity tests using bacteria.
Known al iquots (0.1 ml) of one of the bacterial suspensions were
dispensed into sets of sterile test tubes followed by 2.0 ml of molten
trace histidine/tryptophan supplemented top agar at 45°C, 0.1 ml
of the appropriately diluted test material or vehicle control and
either 0.5 ml of the 59 liver microsome mix or phosphate buffer.
The contents of each test tube were mixed and equally distributed
onto the surface of Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plates (one tube per
plate). This procedure was repeated, in triplicate, for each bacterial
strain and for each concentration of test material with and without
59-mix.
All of the plates were incubated at 37°C for approximately 48 hours
and the frequency of revertant colonies assessed using a Domino
colony counter. Due to the potentially volatile nature of the test
material, all of the plates were sealed in stainless steel containers
(one dose group per container) for the duration of the incubation
period.
The second experiment was performed using methodology as described for
experiment 1, using fresh bacterial cultures, test material and control
solutions in triplicate. - Evaluation criteria:
- For a substance to be considered positive in this test system, it should have
induced a dose-related and statistically(S) significant increase in mutation rate
(of at least twice the spontaneous reversion rate) in one or more strains of
bacteria in the presence and/or absence of the 59 microsomal enzymes in both
experiments at sub-toxic dose levels. In the event of the two experiments
giving conflicting or equivocal results, then a third experiment may be
performed to confirm the correct response. To be considered negative the
number of induced revertants compared to spontaneous revertants should be
less than twofold at each dose level employed, the intervals of which should
be between two and five fold and extend to the limits imposed by toxicity,
solUbility or up to the maximum recommended dose of 5000 tJg/plate. In this
case the limiting factor was the maximum recommended dose.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- other: as specified above
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: as specified above
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Additional information on results:
- Observations:
None - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'. Remarks: main test
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
This study was conducted to assess the mutagenic potential of the test material using a bacterial/microsome test system. The study was based on the in vitro technique described by Ames and his co-workers (1, 2, 3) and Garner et al (4) in which mutagenic activity is assessed by exposing histidine auxotrophs of Salmonella typhimurium to various concentrations of the test material. This method conforms to the guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing published by the major Japanese Regulatory Authorities including MITI, MHW, MOL and MAFF. This method also conforms with the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Protocol No. 471, Method B14 in EC Commission Directive 92/69/EEC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) guidelines. A copy of the Certificate of Compliance with GLP, issued by the UK Department of Health, is included as Appendix IV.
The substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.