Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-214-6 | CAS number: 930-33-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
In a in vitro EPIDERM skin Corrosion Test performed according to the OECD guideline 431 and in compliance with GLP requirement, the corrosivity potential of the test item using the EpiDerm™ Human Skin Model was evaluated after treatment periods of 3 and 60 minutes.
The optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm (OD570).
The mean OD570 for negative treated tissues was 2.095 and 2.057, respectively, for the 3 and 60 - minute exposure period. The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 2.8% relative to the negative control following the 60-minute exposure period. The control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
In the range 20 to 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between the two tissue replicates of each treatment group did not exceed 30%. The acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied and the test item is considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
In a Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeabilty (BCOP) Assay, performed according to the OECD guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP requirement, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.
The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the range of 65.1 to 123.3. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.The negative control gave opacity of ≤2.4 and permeability ≤0.072. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
With a IVIS of 87.8, the test item is classified according to the prediction model as Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19/07/2017-21/07/2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: hemring/Batch 0727/16
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 28 April 2019
- Purity test date: 99%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
- Stability under test conditions: The test item was used as supplied.
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle:
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium:
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: The test item was used as supplied.
- Preliminary purification step (if any):
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel:
- Final preparation of a solid:
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material)
TYPE OF BIOCIDE/PESTICIDE FORMULATION (if applicable)
OTHER SPECIFICS: - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: Not specified
- Source strain:
- other: Epidermm Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Kit
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- NA
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 and 60 minutes
- Number of replicates:
- 2
- Species:
- other: NA
- Strain:
- other: NA
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- NA
- Type of coverage:
- other: NA
- Preparation of test site:
- other: NA
- Vehicle:
- other: NA
- Controls:
- other: NA
- Amount / concentration applied:
- NA
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- NA
- Observation period:
- NA
- Number of animals:
- NA
- Details on study design:
- NA
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- at 3 min
- Value:
- >= 87.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: NA
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- at 60 min
- Value:
- >= 78
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: NA
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: The MTT solution containing the test item did not turn blue/purple. This was taken to indicate the test item did not reduce MTT
- Direct-MTT reduction: The MTT solution containing the test item did not turn blue/purple. This was taken to indicate the test item did not reduce MTT
- Colour interference with MTT: The solution containing the test item did not become colored. This was taken to indicate the test item did not have the potential to cause color interference.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY:
yes
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline:
REMINDER ON QUALITY CRITERIA
The results of the assay are considered acceptable if the following assay acceptance criteria are achieved:
Negative Control
The absolute OD570 of the negative control treated tissues in the MTT-test is an indicator of tissue viability obtained in the testing laboratory after the shipping and storing procedure and under specific conditions of the assay. The mean OD570 of the two negative control tissues should be ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for each exposure time, which ensures that the tissue viability meets the acceptance criteria.
Positive Control
Potassium Hydroxide 8.0N solution is used as a positive control. An assay meets the acceptance criterion if mean relative tissue viability of the 60 minute positive control is < 15%.
Coefficient of Variation
In the range 20 and 100% viability, the Coefficient of Variation between tissue replicates should be ≤ 30%. - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
Classification of corrosivity potential is based on relative viabilities for both exposure times according to the EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 UN GHS (cf table in the study report). - Executive summary:
In a in vitro EPIDERM skin Corrosion Test (Lacey F.E., 2018), performed according to the OECD guideline 431 and in compliance with GLP requirement, the corrosivity potential of the test item using the EpiDerm™ Human Skin Model was evaluated after treatment periods of 3 and 60 minutes.
Duplicate tissues were treated with the test item for exposure periods of 3 and 60 minutes. Negative (sterile distilled water) and positive (8.0N Potassiumm hydroxyde) control groups were treated for each exposure period. At the end of the exposure period, the test item was rinsed from each tissue before each tissue was taken for MTT-loading. After MTT loading each tissue was placed in 2 mL Isopropanol for MTT extraction.
At the end of the formazan extraction period each well was mixed thoroughly and triplicate 200 μL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm (OD570).
Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).
The mean OD570 for the negative control treated tissues was 2.095 for the 3-Minute exposure period and 2.057 for the 60-Minute exposure period. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
The relative mean tissue viability for the positive control treated tissues was 2.8% relative to the negative control following the 60-Minute exposure period. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
In the range 20 to 100% viability the Coefficient of Variation between the two tissue replicates of each treatment group did not exceed 30%. The acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.
The test item was considered to be non-corrosive to the skin.
Reference
Mean OD570 Values and Viabilities for the Negative Control Item, Positive Control Item and Test Item
Tissue | Exposure period | Mean OD570 of individual tissues | Mean OD570 of duplicate tissues | Standard deviation | Coefficent of Variation (%) | Relative Mean Viability |
Negative control | 3 minutes | 2.000 | 2.098 | 0.134 | 6.4 | 100 |
2.190 | ||||||
60 minutes | 2.122 | 2.057 | 0.092 | 4.5 | ||
1.992 | ||||||
Positive control | 3 minutes | 0.063 | 0.069 | 0.008 | na | 3.3 |
0.074 | ||||||
60 minutes | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.002 | na | 2.8 | |
0.055 | ||||||
Test item | 3 minutes | 1.889 | 1.827 | 0.088 | 4.8 | 87.2 |
1.765 | ||||||
60 minutes | 1.638 | 1.604 | 0.048 | 3.0 | 78.0 | |
1.570 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26/09/2017-26/09/2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Chemring/Batch 0727/16
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 28 April 2019
- Purity test date: 99%
- Physical state/Appearance: off white powder
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
- Stability under test conditions: For the purpose of this study the test item was used as supplied.
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle:
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium:
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: For the purpose of this study the test item was used as supplied.
- Preliminary purification step (if any):
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel:
- Final preparation of a solid:
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material)
TYPE OF BIOCIDE/PESTICIDE FORMULATION (if applicable)
OTHER SPECIFICS: - Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: adult cattle, from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals
- Age at study initiation: 12-60 months old
The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared immediately on arrival. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- Approximately 0.725 g of the solid test item was found to adequately cover the corneal surface.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes (4 hours)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- NA
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were randomly allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.
- Details on study design:
- At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete EMEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete EMEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete EMEM without phenol red. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- None
- Value:
- >= 87.8
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: NA
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system:
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: Yes
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
Opacity Measurement
The change in opacity for each cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final opacity reading. These values were then corrected by subtracting the average change in opacity observed for the negative control corneas. The mean opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of each cornea for that treatment group.
Permeability Measurement
The corrected OD492 was calculated by subtracting the mean OD492 of the negative control corneas from the OD492 value of each treated cornea. The OD492 value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for the treatment group.
In Vitro Irritancy Score
The following formula was used to determine the In Vitro Irritancy Score:
In Vitro Irritancy Score = mean opacity value + (15 x mean permeability OD492 value)
Additionally, the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test item induced a response through only one of the two endpoints.
Visual Observation
The condition of the cornea was visually assessed post treatment.
CRITERIA FOR AN ACCEPTABLE TEST
For an acceptable test the following positive control criterion should be achieved:
20% w/v Imidazole was used for positive control purposes.
The test was acceptable if the positive control produced an In Vitro Irritancy Score which fell within two standard deviations of the historical mean during 2016 for this testing facility. Therefore the In Vitro Irritancy Score should fall within the range of 65.1 to 123.3.
For an acceptable test the following negative control criteria should be achieved:
Sodium chloride 0.9% w/v was used for negative control purposes. The test was acceptable if the negative control produced an In Vitro Irritancy Score which is less than or equal to the upper limit for background opacity and permeability values during 2016 for bovine corneas treated with the respective negative control. When testing solids the negative control limit for opacity should be ≤2.4 and for permeability ≤0.072. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- With a IVIS of 87,8, the test item is classified according to the prediction model as Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage.
IVIS Classification
> or=3 No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP
>3; < or= 55 No prediction of eye irritation can be made
>55 Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage - Executive summary:
In a Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeabilty (BCOP) Assay (Henzell G., 2018), performed according to the OECD guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP requirement, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.
The undiluted test item was applied for 240 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently.The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).
The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the range of 65.1 to 123.3. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.The negative control gave opacity of ≤2.4 and permeability ≤0.072. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.
With a IVIS of 87.8, the test item is classified according to the prediction model as Category 1. UN GHS or EU CLP Causes serious eye damage
Reference
Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurement
Individual and mean corneal opacity measurements and individual and mean corneal permeability measurements are given in Appendix 1 of this sutdy report.
Corneal Epithelium Condition
The condition of each cornea is given in Appendix 2 of the study report.
The corneas treated with the test item were cloudy post treatment. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment.
In Vitro Irritancy Score
The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:
Treatment | In vitro Irritancy Score |
Test item | 87,8 |
Negative control | 0,6 |
Positive control | 109,7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Triazolone is not classified for skin irritation but is classified as a Category 1 eye irritant
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)