Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
27 July 2012 - 15 August 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Test Data for Registration of Agricultural Chemicals, Eye Irritation (2-1-5), 12 Nohsan No. 8147, Agricultural Production Bureau, November 24, 2000
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Disodium hexatitanate
EC Number:
815-182-4
Cas Number:
12058-75-2
Molecular formula:
Na2Ti6O13
IUPAC Name:
Disodium hexatitanate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Description: White powder
Storage conditions: Room temperature
Batch number: 1C96
Date of receipt: 26 August 2011
Expiry date: 24 March 2014
Purity: 100%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 3-26 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 3.11 - 4.52 kg
- Housing: Each animal was housed individually in a plastic cage with perforated floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard laboratory rabbit diet per day
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: All rabbits were acclimatised to the experimental
environment for a period of 8 or 13 weeks prior to the start of the study

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 to 20°C
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours of artificial light (06:00 to 18:00 GMT) in each 24 hour period

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Ocular reactions to treatment were assessed 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and eight days after treatment
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Details on study design:
The eyes of each animal were examined prior to instillation of the test substance to ensure that there was no pre-existing corneal damage, iridial inflammation or conjunctival irritation. Each animal was gently restrained. The dose (0.1 g) was instilled into the right eye by pulling the lower eyelid away from the eye ball to form a cup into which the test substance was dropped. The eyelids were then gently held together for one second before releasing; the left eye remained untreated. One animal (the sentinel) was initially treated and in the absence of a severe effect the remaining two animals were committed to the study.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Conjunctiva Redness Discharge score 1 only at 1 h; fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Conjunctiva Redness Discharge score 1 only at 1 h; fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
Conjunctiva Redness Discharge score 1 only at 1 h; fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
other: n/a
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The highest total mean score was 4.0 occurring at the 1-hour observation; accordingly under the criteria Kay and Calandra (1962) test substance was classified as “minimally irritating” to the eye. Test substance did not require labelling in accordance with European Commission regulation 1272/2008.