Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
09 April 2015 - 05 June 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method B.46 (In vitro dermal irritation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 439 (In vitro dermal irritation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropyl acrylate
EC Number:
241-045-8
EC Name:
2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropyl acrylate
Cas Number:
16969-10-1
Molecular formula:
C12H14O4
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxy-3-phenoxypropyl acrylate
Test material form:
liquid

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: reconstructed human epidermis
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
EpiskinTM Model Kit (0.38 cm2 tissues) supplied by SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France.
Medium and Incubation T°C: 37°C

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Rinsing: At the end of the treatment period, each tissue was removed from the well of the treatment plate, and rinsed with D-PBS. Rinsing was achieved by gently filling and emptying several times each tissue with D PBS to gently remove any residual test or control items. The rinsed tissues were transferred to the second column of 3 wells containing 2 mL of maintenance medium in each well and the plates were incubated at +37°C, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator for 42 hours.

POSITIVE CONTROL
Name: Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate (SDS) at a 5% (w/v) aqueous solution.

NEGATIVE CONTROL
Name: Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (D-PBS).

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm:
Relative mean viability (%) = 100 x mean cOD(test item) / mean cOD(negative control)
where:
- mean cOD Negative Control = mean ODNC – mean ODblank
- mean cOD Test Item = mean ODTI – mean ODblank
Control samples:
yes, concurrent no treatment
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
Amount applied per tissue: 10 +/- 2 µL.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure period of 15 minutes, followed by rinsing
MTT-loading after a 42h-incubation period following rinsing. Observation of MTT-> formazan transformation by viable cells.
Number of replicates:
Triplicate

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
79
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
In the preliminary tests, the test item was found not to have direct MTT reducing properties or colouring potential.
 
Main test: All acceptance criteria for the negative and positive controls were fulfilled. The study was therefore considered to be valid.

Following a 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours of recovery period, the relative mean viability of the tissues treated with the test item was 79% with a standard deviation of 15%.
As the mean viability was > 50% after the MTT reduction, the IL-1a concentrations inculture media samples retained from the three negative controls and the three test item-treated tissues were analyzed by ELISA.
The mean IL-1a concentration for treated tissues was 23.8 pg/mL. Due to this value being below 60 pg/mL, the results met the criteria for an in vitro classification as non-irritant to skin.

In vivo

Other effects:
no

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In vitro, the test item is considered to be non-irritant to the skin.
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the test item using the EpiskinTM reconstructed human epidermis model.

The study design was based upon international guidelines (OECD Guideline No. 439 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 761/2009, B.46). The study was conducted in compliance with CiToxLAB France standard operating procedures and the principles of Good Laboratory Practice.

 

Methods

Preliminary tests were performed to detect the ability of the test item to directly reduce MTT as well as its colouring potential.

Following the preliminary tests, the skin irritation potential of the test item was tested in the main test. The test item and both the negative and positive controls were applied topically on triplicate tissues and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. At the end of the treatment period, each tissue was rinsed with D-PBS and incubated for 42 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The cell viability was then assessed by means of the colourimetric MTT reduction assay.

Relative viability values were calculated for each tissue and expressed as a percentage of the mean viability of the negative control tissues which was set at 100% (reference viability).

In addition, the concentration of the inflammatory mediator IL-1awas evaluated in the culture medium retained following the 42-hour recovery period. This quantification, based on an ELISA assay, was performed since the mean relative viability of the test item-treated tissues was > 50% following the MTT reduction assay.

 

Results

Preliminary tests

In the preliminary tests, the test item was found not to have direct MTT reducing properties or colouring potential.

 

Main test

All acceptance criteria for the negative and positive controls were fulfilled. The study was therefore considered to be valid.

Following a 15 minutes exposure and 42 hours of recovery period, the relative mean viability of the tissues treated with the test item was 79% with a standard deviation of 15%.

As the mean viability was > 50% after the MTT reduction, the IL-1a concentrations inculture media samples retained from the three negative controls and the three test item-treated tissues were analyzed by ELISA.

The mean IL-1a concentration for treated tissues was 23.8 pg/mL. Due to this value being below 60 pg/mL, the results met the criteria for an in vitro classification as non-irritant to skin.

 

Conclusion

Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test item is considered to be non-irritant to skin.

According to the results of this study, the classification of the test item should be:

.            not classified (Directive 67/548/EEC) and no category (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008).