Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-370-5 | CAS number: 220410-74-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1999-01-18 to 1999-03-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant Guideline study. Acceptable deviation from OECD Guideline 406 (adopted 1992): skin reactions after induction treatment were not reported.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 17, 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hilltop Lab Animals Inc., Scottdale, Pennsylvania, USA
- Age at study initiation: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: males 358 g to 414 g; females 363 g to 406 g
- Housing: individually in suspended stainless steel cages
- Diet: PMI Certified Guinea Pig Chow #5026 (Purina Mills, Inc.) ad libitum
- Water: Municipal tap water treated by reverse osmosis ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum of five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 17-22°C
- Humidity: 21-56%
- Air changes: 10 to 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod: 12-hour light / 12-hour dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1999-01-28 (Dose Range Finding) To: 1999-03-06 (Scoring main study) - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- - Topical range-finding study: 100% and at 25%, 50% and 75% w/v in deionized water
- Intradermal range-finding study: 0.1%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% w/v in deionized water
- Sensitization study: the test article was utilized at 5.0% w/v in deionized water (intradermal induction) and at 100% (topical induction, challenge and rechallenge). - Route:
- other: Hilltop Chamber, epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- - Topical range-finding study: 100% and at 25%, 50% and 75% w/v in deionized water
- Intradermal range-finding study: 0.1%, 1.0%, 3.0% and 5.0% w/v in deionized water
- Sensitization study: the test article was utilized at 5.0% w/v in deionized water (intradermal induction) and at 100% (topical induction, challenge and rechallenge). - No. of animals per dose:
- Topical and intradermal Range-Finding Study: 2 males and 2 females each
Sensitization study: 10 males and 10 females
Challenge control and re-challenge control: 5 males and 5 females each - Details on study design:
- A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures
- intradermal (test animals): three pairs of injections on day 0
a. Injection Pair A: 0.1 mL of FCA emulsion
b. Injection Pair B: 0.1 mL of 5.0% test item in deionized water
c. Injection Pair C: 0.1 mL of 5.0% test item/FCA emulsion
- challenge and rechallenge control animals received the same treatment, except test item
- topical: Following clipping , 0.5 mL of 10% w/w sodium lauryl sulfate in petrolatum was spread over the intradermal injection sites on day 6. On day 7, any residual sodium lauryl sulfate preparation was removed, and test item (100% ) or deionized water was applied to the test item or control groups respectively.
- Exposure period, topical: 48 hours (after dosing, the elastic wrap, tape and patch were removed)
- Test groups: one test group
- Control group: a challenge control group and a rechallenge control group
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: once, plus one re-challenge to test group
- Day of challenge: day 20
- Day of re-challenge: day 28
- Exposure period: approximately 24 hours
- Test groups: one test group
- Control group: a challenge control group and a rechallenge control group
- Concentrations: 100% test item
- Evaluation: approximately 24 and 48 hours following chamber removal - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Reliability check: alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde, performed during the past six months
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Skin sensitization
The dermal sensitization potential of the test item was evaluated in Hartley-derived albino guinea pigs according to OECD TG 406 adopted 1992-07-17. Ten male and ten female guinea pigs received intrademnal injections of 5.0% w/v of the test item in deionised water along with injections of FCA and the test item in FCA. Following challenge with 100% test item, dermal scores of 0 were noted in all test and challenge control animals. Group mean dermal scores were noted to be similar in the test animals as compared with the challenge control animals. Following rechallenge with 100% test item, dermal scores of 0 were noted in all test and rechallenge control animals. Group mean dermal scores were noted to be similar in the test animals as compared with the rechallenge control animals. Based on the results of this study, according to the criteria as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) the test item is not considered to be a contact sensitizer in guinea pigs.
Human data
The objective of this study (see IUCLID section 7.10) was to evaluate the test articles for the induction of contact sensitization by repetitive applications to the skin of human volunteers. The study design is an adaptation of the Draize Patch Test. One hundred and four subjects (32 male, 72 female) completed all phases of the study. Three adverse events were reported during the course of the study. None of these events were related to the test articles. Under the conditions of this study, test item does not appear to exhibit the potential for contact sensitization at either test concentration. In addition, the test article did not appear to cause significant irritation potential during the three week induction period or during the challenge phase of the study.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
The test item was tested for skin sensitisation in a GLP study according to OECD 406 in guinea pigs. The test item is not considered to be a contact sensitizer in guinea pigs.
Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
Only one GLP and guideline compliant study available.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data on sensitisation the test item ist not subjected to classification and labelling according to Regulation 67/548/EEC (DSD) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.