Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study similar to OECD 408. Study did not include clinical biochemistry determinations, ophthalmological examination. Some tissues were not examined such as spinal cord, pituitary, thymus, female mammary glands, and peripheral nerves.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1961
Report date:
1961

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
See above rationale for reliability
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(octylthio)ethanol
EC Number:
222-598-4
EC Name:
2-(octylthio)ethanol
Cas Number:
3547-33-9
Molecular formula:
C10H22OS
IUPAC Name:
2-(octylsulfanyl)ethan-1-ol
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Ethanol, 2-(octylthio)-
IUPAC Name:
Ethanol, 2-(octylthio)-
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
2-hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Repellent 874
- Name of test material- Repellent 874, Technical Grade, consists of 95 % (based on percent of theoretical sulfur content) or more of 2-hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide and 5 % or less of related compounds-all considered active for labeling purposes by the Environmental Protection Agency.
- Stability under test conditions: Stable under all usual conditions of storage and use. Avoid highly alkaline emulsifiers in emulsion concentrates.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 21 days
- Weight at study initiation: 40-50 g
- Housing: The animals were housed in screen-bottom individual cages.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: ground commercial laboratory chow, basal ration
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Test diets were formulated biweekly, or more often as required, and test animals were fed thrice weekly or as required.

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): biweekly or as required.

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): laboratory diet
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 0.08, 0.4 and 2.0%
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Animals were fed thrice weekly, or as required.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0.08, 0.4, and 2%
Basis:
nominal in diet
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
74, 368, 1842 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: calculated (see Overall remarks section)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
No data

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly


FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): yes, calculated as average in grams per group of 10 animals on a weekly basis.


HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 13 weeks
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: 5 animals per sex per group
- Parameters examined: red blood cell count, white blood cell count, hemoglobin, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils


URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 13 weeks
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- Parameters examined: specific gravity, pH, nitrogen, blood, sugar, and albumin
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, including organ weight measurements (liver, heart, kidney, spleen and gonads)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes, brain, thyroid, larynx, salivary gland, lymph node, lung, heart, liver, kidney, spleen, pancreas, small intestine, colon, stomach, urinary bladder, testes or ovary, uterus, bone and bone marrow.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Details on results:
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
No significant differences found.

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study)
No significant differences found.

HEMATOLOGY
No significant differences found.

URINALYSIS
No significant differences found.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
No significant differences found.

GROSS PATHOLOGY
No significant differences found.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
No significant differences found.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC (if applicable)
No significant differences found.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
>= 2 other: %
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: No observed effects of the test substance present in females or males up to a concentration of 2% of the test substance (top dose evaluated in study).

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No changes related to treatment with test substance were observed. This lead to the conclusion that under these test conditions, the test substance was not toxic to test animals. NOEL >=2 %.
Executive summary:

In a repeated dose study conducted with methods similar to OECD #408 guidelines, 21-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats (10/sex) were exposed via the diet for 13 weeks to 0, 0.08, 0.4 and 2.0% (estimated to be 74, 368, and 1842 mg/kg/day, respectively) ethanol, 2-(octylthio). The animals were fed 3 times weekly, or as required. Weight and food consumption data were collected weekly. Urinalysis and hematological evaluations were performed at 4, 8 and 13 weeks. Terminal examinations including gross necropsy, organ weight measurements (liver, heart, kidney, spleen and gonads) and histological examination of tissue specimens of the brain, thyroid, larynx, salivary gland, lymph node, lung, heart, liver, kidney, spleen, pancreas, small intestine, colon, stomach, urinary bladder, testes or ovary, uterus, bone and bone marrow were included. No treatment-related effects were observed during the 13-week study or at necropsy for any of the parameters measured; the NOEL was determined to be greater than or equal to 2% (estimated to be 1842 mg/kg/day).