Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: This study is classified as reliable without restrictions because it was conducted according to GLP guidance and OECD 405 guidelines.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996
Report date:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Alkenes, C6-8
IUPAC Name:
Alkenes, C6-8
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): SHOP C68 Internal Olefin
- Substance type: Alkenes, C6-8
- Physical state: Liquid (clear, colourless)
- Lot/batch No.: 168082
- Storage condition of test material: Cool conditions (not exceeding 13 degrees C), under nitrogen, protected from light, in original container

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Froxfield SPF Rabbits, Broadway Farm, Froxfield, Hampshire, England.
- Age at study initiation: Approximately 4 months old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.8 to 3.35 kg
- Housing: Individually in suspended stainless steel cages mounted in mobile batteries. The cages were fitted with perforated countersunk floor panels. A tray beneath the floor was lined with absorbent paper which was changed at regular intervals.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Health status of each animal was monitored and a record kept. Both eyes of all animals were examined before administration of test material for signs of pre-existing irritation, reaction or abnormality which would prevent it from being used in this study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 to 19
- Humidity (%): 38 to 60
- Air changes (per hr): At least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL single dose
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Dose was instilled into the right eye by pulling the lower eyelid away from the eyeball to form a cup into which the test material was dropped. The eyelids were gently held together for 1 second and then released.
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, and 72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): None

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Opthalmoscope or pencil beam torch was used to facilitate inspection of the eyes.
Fluorescein was used from the 24-hour period onward to aid cornea examination.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
corneal opacity
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24,48, and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
other: Iridial lesions
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24,48, and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness of conjunctivae
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, and 72 hours
Score:
0.2
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24,48, and 72 hours
Score:
0

Any other information on results incl. tables

Grade for Ocular Irritation Responses

 

Animal No. and Sex: 498F

Pain Evaluation Response: 1

Region of the Eye

Response

Grade of Response at time after instillation (hours)

1

24

48

72

Cornea

Opacity

0

0

0

0

Area

0

0

0

0

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

Stippling

-

-

-

-

Iris

Value

0

0

0

0

Conjunctiva

Redness

2

0

0

0

Chemosis

1

0

0

0

Discharge

1

0

0

0

Necrosis

-

-

-

-

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

 

Animal No. and Sex: 28TD786F

Pain Evaluation Response: 1

Region of the Eye

Response

Grade of Response at time after instillation (hours)

1

24

48

72

Cornea

Opacity

0

0

0

0

Area

0

0

0

0

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

Stippling

-

-

-

-

Iris

Value

0

0

0

0

Conjunctiva

Redness

1

1

1

0

Chemosis

0

0

0

0

Discharge

0

0

0

0

Necrosis

-

-

-

-

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

 

Animal No. and Sex: 28TD799F

Pain Evaluation Response: 1

Region of the Eye

Response

Grade of Response at time after instillation (hours)

1

24

48

72

Cornea

Opacity

0

0

0

0

Area

0

0

0

0

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

Stippling

-

-

-

-

Iris

Value

0

0

0

0

Conjunctiva

Redness

1

0

0

0

Chemosis

1

0

0

0

Discharge

0

0

0

0

Necrosis

-

-

-

-

Ulceration

-

-

-

-

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this test, SHOP C68 is considered to be a non-irritant to the eye.
Executive summary:

In a primary eye irritation study, 0.1 mL of SHOP C68 internal olefin was instilled the conjunctival sac of the right eye in 3 New Zealand White rabbits. Animals then were observed at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Irritation was scored by the guidelines.

 

Initial instillation of the test compound caused very slight initial pain response. All animals had very slight to slight conjunctivitis within an hour of treatment, but one animal showed persistent response at 48 hours. At 72 hours, all animals’ eyes appeared normal.In this study, SHOP C68 internal olefin is a non-irritant to the eye. 

 

This study received a Klimisch score of 1 and is classifiedas reliable without restrictions because it was conducted according to GLP guidance and OECD 405 guidelines.