Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-213-5 | CAS number: 947753-66-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to internationally recognized guidelines and conformed to required GLP standards.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Undecenyl methoxycrylene
- IUPAC Name:
- Undecenyl methoxycrylene
- Reference substance name:
- 2-Propenoic acid, 2-cyano-3,3-diphenyl, 10-undecen-1-yl ester
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-Propenoic acid, 2-cyano-3,3-diphenyl, 10-undecen-1-yl ester
- Reference substance name:
- 947701-81-7
- Cas Number:
- 947701-81-7
- IUPAC Name:
- 947701-81-7
- Reference substance name:
- 700-824-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 700-824-2
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): undecenyl methoxycrylene
- Chemical name: 2-cyano-3-(4'-methoxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropenoic acid, 10-undecen-1-ol ester
- Physical state: amber coloured viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: ABP5032410
- Date received: 12 April 2010
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 12 April 2012
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
- Other: The integrity of supplied data relating to the identity, purity and stability of the test item is the responsibility of the Sponsor.
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Wistar:HsdHan:WIST
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for complete details.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Remarks:
- (Arachis Oil BP)
- Details on exposure:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for complete details.
- Details on mating procedure:
- On Day 15, animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group for a maximum of fourteen days.
Following evidence of mating (designated as Day 0 post coitum) the males were returned to their original cages and females were transferred to individual cages. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for complete details
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for complete details
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID for complete details
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bwt/day
Basis:
other: nominal administered
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- See Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID for complete details
- Positive control:
- None
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- The following observations are relevant to the reproductive effects portion of the OECD 422 guideline. Please refer to Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for a complete description of all observations and examinations.
Mating
Animals were paired on a 1 male: 1 female basis within each dose group, for a period of up to fourteen days. Cage tray-liners were checked each morning for the presence of ejected copulation plugs and each female was examined for the presence of a copulation plug in the vagina. A vaginal smear was prepared for each female and the stage of oestrus or the presence of sperm was recorded. The presence of sperm within the vaginal smear and/or vaginal plug in situ was taken as positive evidence of mating (Day 0 of gestation) and the males were subsequently returned to their original holding cages (unless required for additional pairing). Mated females were housed individually during the period of gestation and lactation.
Pregnancy and Parturition
Each pregnant female was observed at approximately 0830, 1230 and 1630 hours and around the period of expected parturition. Observations were carried out at approximately 0830 and 1230 hours at weekends and public holidays. The following was recorded for each female:
i) Date of pairing
ii) Date of mating
iii) Date and time of observed start of parturition
iv) Date and time of observed completion of parturition
Litter Data
On completion of parturition (Day 0 post partum), the number of live and dead offspring was recorded. Offspring were individually identified within each litter by tattoo on Day 1 post partum.
For each litter the following was recorded:
i) Number of offspring born
ii) Number of offspring alive recorded daily and reported on Days 1 and 4 post
partum
iii) Sex of offspring on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iv) Clinical condition of offspring from birth to Day 5 post partum
v) Individual offspring weights on Days 1 and 4 post partum (litter weights were calculated retrospectively from this data)
Physical Development
All live offspring were assessed for surface righting reflex on Day 1 post partum. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not determined
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- The following were removed from animals that were killed at the end of the study: Prostate, Seminal vesicles, Epididymides, and Testes.
Also, sections of testes and epididymides from all control and 1000 mg/kg/day males were also stained with Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) stain and examined histopathologically. - Litter observations:
- Litter Data
On completion of parturition (Day 0 post partum), the number of live and dead offspring was recorded. Offspring were individually identified within each litter by tattoo on Day 1 post partum.
For each litter the following was recorded:
i) Number of offspring born
ii) Number of offspring alive recorded daily and reported on Days 1 and 4 post
partum
iii) Sex of offspring on Days 1 and 4 post partum
iv) Clinical condition of offspring from birth to Day 5 post partum
v) Individual offspring weights on Days 1 and 4 post partum (litter weights were calculated retrospectively from this data)
Physical Development
All live offspring were assessed for surface righting reflex on Day 1 post partum. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- Pathology
Adult males were killed by intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbitone followed by exsanguination on Day 43. Adult females were killed by intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbitone followed by exsanguination on Day 5 post partum. Surviving offspring were terminated via intracardiac overdose of sodium pentobarbitone. Any females which failed to achieve pregnancy or produce a litter were killed on or after Day 26 post coitum.
For all females, the uterus was examined for signs of implantation and the number of uterine implantations in each horn was recorded. This procedure was enhanced; as necessary, by staining the uteri with a 0.5% ammonium polysulphide solution (Salewski 1964).
All adult animals, including those dying during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
Refer to Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file for a complete desciption of histopathological analyses. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- All offspring, including those dying during the study, were subjected to a full external and internal examination, and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded.
- Statistics:
- Data for males and females prior to pairing, and functional performance test data, where appropriate, quantitative data were analysed by the Provantis™ Tables and Statistics Module. For each variable, the most suitable transformation of the data was found, the use of possible covariates checked and the homogeneity of means assessed using ANOVA and ANCOVA and Bartletts’s test. The transformed data were analysed to find the lowest treatment level that showed a significant effect, using the Williams Test for parametric data or the Shirley Test for non-parametric data. If no dose response was
found, but the data showed non-homogeneity of means, the data were analysed by a stepwise Dunnett (parametric) or Steel (non-parametric) test to determine significant differences from the control group. Finally, if required, pair-wise tests were performed using the Student t-test (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (non-parametric).
Data for females during gestation and lactation, and offspring data were assessed for dose response relationships by linear regression analysis, followed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) incorporating Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance. Where variances were shown to be homogenous, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Dunnett’s test. Where Levene’s test showed unequal variances the data were analysed using non-parametric methods: Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test. Non-parametric methods were used to analyse implantation loss, offspring sex ratio and landmark developmental markers.
Probability values (P) were calculated as follows:
P<0.001 ***
P<0.01 **
P<0.05 *
p≥0.05 (not significant) - Reproductive indices:
- Reproductive Indices
Mating Performance and Fertility:
The following were calculated from the individual data during the mating period of the parental generation:
i) Pre-coital Interval: Calculated as the time elapsing between initial pairing and the observation of positive evidence of mating.
ii) Fertility Indices:
For each group the following were calculated:
Mating Index (%) = Number of animals mated / Number of animals paired x 100
Pregnancy Index (%) = Number of pregnant females / Number of animals mated x 100
Gestation and Parturition Data
The following were calculated for individual data during the gestation and parturition period of the parental generation.
i) Gestation Length: Calculated as the number of days of gestation including the day for observation of mating and the start of parturition.
ii) Parturition Index The following was calculated for each group:
Parturition Index (%) = Number of females delivering live offspring / Number of pregnant females x 100
Litter Responses
The standard unit of assessment was considered to be the litter, therefore values were first calculated for each litter and the group mean was calculated using their individual litter values. Group mean values included all litters reared to termination (Day 5 of age).
i) Implantation Losses (%)
Group mean percentile pre-implantation and post-implantation loss were calculated for each female/litter as follows:
Pre–implantation loss = Number of corpora lutea - number of implantation sites number of Corpora Lutea x 100
Post–implantation loss = Number of implantation sites - Total number of offspring born / Number of implantation sites x 100
ii) Sex Ratio (% males)
Calculated for each litter on Days 1 and 4 post partum: Number of male offspring / Total number of offspring x 100. - Offspring viability indices:
- Live Birth and Viability Indices
For each litter as follows:
Live Birth Index (%) = Number of offspring alive on Day 1 / Number of offspring born x 100
Viability Index (%) = Number of offspring alive on Day 4 / Number of offspring alive on Day 1 x 100
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- see Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- see Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- see Section 7.5.1 of this IUCLID file
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no treatment-related effects on reproductive performance.
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
There were no treatment-related macroscopic abnormalities detected in interim death or interim kill offspring.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no significant treatment-related effects on F1 offspring.
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary of Effects on Reproductive Performance
Observations | Dose Level (mg/kg bwt/day) | |||
0 (control) | 100 | 300 | 1000 | |
Mated Pairs (n) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Females showing evidence of copulation (n) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Pregnant females (n) | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
Conception days 1-5 (n) | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
Gestation = 22 Days (n) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Gestation = 22 1/2 Days (n) | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
Gestation = 23 Days (n) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Gestation = 23 1/2 Days (n) | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
Dams with live young born (n) | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
Dams with live young at Day 4 post partum (n) | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
Corpora lutea/dam (mean) | 14.5 | 14.3 | 14.1 | 13 |
Implants/dam (mean) | 14.1 | 13.2 | 13.1 | 11.7 |
Live offspring/dam at Day 1 post partum (mean) | 13.1 | 11.6 | 11.1 | 11 |
Live offspring/dam at Day 4 post partum (mean) | 12.7 | 11.6 | 11.1 | 10.8 |
Sex ratio: % males at Day 1 post partum (mean) | 47.9 | 53.7 | 47.7 | 57.4 |
Sex ratio: % males at Day 4 post partum (mean) | 48.5 | 53.7 | 47.7 | 57.7 |
Litter weight (g) at Day 1 post partum (mean) | 73.54 | 71.79 | 63.97 | 66.57 |
Litter weight (g) at Day 4 post partum (mean) | 106.49 | 107.51 | 93.21 | 94.18 |
Male offspring weight (g) at Day 1 post partum (mean) | 5.8 | 6.52 | 5.97 | 6.27 |
Male offspring weight (g) at Day 4 post partum (mean) | 8.62 | 9.75 | 8.76 | 8.99 |
Female offspring weight (g) at Day 1 post partum (mean) | 5.48 | 6.04 | 5.7 | 5.95 |
Female offspring weight (g) at Day 4 post partum (mean) | 8.27 | 9.23 | 8.44 | 8.74 |
LOSS OF OFFSPRINT | ||||
Pre-implantation (corpora lutea minus implantations) | ||||
0 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Pre-natal (implantations minus live births) | ||||
0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Post natal (live births minus offspring alive on Day 4 post partum) | ||||
0 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No treatment-related effects were detected on mating performance or fertility in parental animals and no significant effects were detected in the F1 offsping. Therefore, a NOEL for reproductive toxicity was established at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.