Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-025-3 | CAS number: 552-89-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data from the literature in which all parameters described are closely comparable to a guideline method and well documented.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Rec assay
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Species / strain / cell type:
- bacteria, other: Bacillus subtilis
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 mg (Dose/plate)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterilized dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Source: Junsei Chemical Co - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- other: N-Ethyl-N'- nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG), 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Ames test:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation; in suspension; as impregnation on paper disk
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 0.1 ml of various concentrations of test compounds were added to a sterile test-tube containing 3 -6 x 10^7 bacerial cells, 0.5 ml of S9 mix or sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). This mixture was preincubated in a shaker water-bath at 37°C for 15 min, then added to 2 ml molten top agar (45°C). The contents of each tube were mixed well and immediately poured onto the surface of a minimal-agar plate.
- Exposure duration: The plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C in the dark for 70 h.
- Control: A control plate contained 0.05 ml of DMSO.
- Contamination test: was carried out through each experiment.
- The background bacterial lawn: was routinely checked by microscopy
- Ampicilin resistance: TA 98 and TA 100 were checked routinely
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: all tests were performed in duplicate and repeated at least 3 times separately
Rec assay:
Rec assay according to procedures described by Kada et al. (1972) and Hirano et al. (1982).
In brief, liquid broth medium consisted of 10 g beef extract, 10 g polypeptone and 5 g NaCl per 100 ml. Minimal salt solution (MM) containing 1 g (NH4)2SO4, 10 g KH2PO4, 0.1 g MgSO4 x 7H2O and 0.5 g sodium citrate per 1000 ml (neutralized with KOH) was used for dilution and washing of bacteria. Overnight cultures of strains H17 and M45 in liquid broth medium were diluted 10 times with minimal salt solution. They were streaked from small pipettes onto the surface of a broth agar plate, care being taken not to let them touch one another. Paper discs, 13 mm in diameter, were prepared by punching filter papers. A disc has soaked in 0.05 ml of various concentrations of compounds and placed on the plate so as to cover the end of the bacterial streaks. After incubation for 24 h at 37°C , grown bacteria become visible except in the inhibition zone depending on the strain and on the compound used. When a compound showed higher inhibition to M45 (Rec-) than to H17 (Rec+) the assay was repeated. A difference of more than 1 mm was a positive response. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 98, TA 1538, TA 1537, TA 100, TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Concentrations 1 and 5 mg/plate indicate toxic effects with and without metabolic activation in all test strains
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: Bacillus subtilis
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under this test conditions no mutagenic effects of o-Nitrobenzaldehyde were observed. - Executive summary:
The mutagenicities of 37 mono-nitrobenzene derivatives, i.e. the ortho, meta, and para isomers of nitrotoluene, nitrophenol, nitroaniline, nitroanisole, nitrobenzaldehyde, nitrobenzyl chloride, nitrobenzonitrile, nitroacetophenone, nitrophenetol, nitrobenzoic acid, nitrophenylacetic acid, and nitrocinnamic acid and p-nitrothiophenol, were tested in the Ames test and rec assay. The rec assay gave more positive results than the Ames test. The para-substituted nitrobenzene derivatives were always positive in the rec assay as were all but 2 in the Ames test, while 5 out of 12 ortho and meta derivatives were mutagenic in the Ames test. The results of the present study, combined with those of the previous study, are discussed with special reference to the structure-mutagenicity relationships.
In this endpoint study record only the results for the substance o-Nitrobenzaldehyde (CAS 552 -89 -6) were considered.
Reference
Table 2: Results for o-Nitrobenzaldehyde, data represent the results of 3 separate experiments and give the mean values of 3 plates. The numbers of revertant colonies indicate mean +- S.D., all these numbers of revertant colonies were counted after 68 - 72 h incubation.
Dose (/plate) | Ames test | Rec assay | |||||||||
TA98 | TA1538 | TA1537 | TA100 | TA1535 | (mm)** | ||||||
-S9 | +S9 |
-S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | ||
0.01 mg | 24 +-3 | 22 +-3 | 20 +-3 | 21 +-3 | 8 +-2 | 10 +-2 | 163 +-18 | 174 +-20 | 31 +-5 | 35 +-4 | |
0.05 | 28 +-4 | 31 +-5 | 28 +-3 | 26 +-4 | 9 +-2 | 9 +-1 | 168 +-22 | 170 +-23 | 21 +-3 | 30 +-5 | |
0.1 | 24 +-3 | 28 +-4 | 31 +-3 | 25 +-4 | 12 +-3 | 11 +-2 | 164 +-16 | 168 +-19 | 29 +-5 | 32 +-4 | |
0.5 | 14 +-7* | 38 +-5 | 18 +-2 | 22 +-3 | 10 +-3 | 10 +-2 | 169 +-18 | 173 +-16 | 35 +-5 | 32 +-4 | 0 |
1 | 0* | 10 +-4* | 0 * | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | |
5 | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 5.5 |
DMSO | |||||||||||
0.05 ml | 26 +-5 | 28 +-6 | 22 +-4 | 20 +-5 | 8 +-3 | 10 +-2 | 181 +-26 | 191 +-29 | 30 +-5 | 34 +-4 | 0 |
ENNG | |||||||||||
2 µg | 1778 +-401 | ||||||||||
10 µg | 1389 +-331 | ||||||||||
2 -NF | |||||||||||
2 µg | 1559 +-325 | ||||||||||
5 µg | 1632 +-294 | ||||||||||
9 -AA | |||||||||||
100 µg | 1068 +-447 | ||||||||||
2 -AA | 1014 +-166 | 1322 +-238 | |||||||||
2 µg | |||||||||||
5 µg | 1082 +-351 | 185 +-41 | 161 +-29 | ||||||||
4 -NQO | |||||||||||
1 mg | 7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Under the condition of the test, the TS has not to be classified according to CLP.
Four Ames Tests with the substance o-Nitrobenzaldehyde from the literature are available. Three (Shimizu 1986, Suzuki 1983, Kawai 1987) of them show negative results and one (Chiu 1978) a positive result.
The study published by Shimizu (1986) was the most reliable study and was selected as key.
Shimizu (1986) analyzed five bacterial strains of Salmonella thyphimurium (TA 98, TA 1538, TA 1537, TA 100 and TA 135) to test the substance in a concentration range from 0.01 mg/plate to 5 mg/plate using six concentrations. Cytotoxic effects were observed above 0.5 mg substance per plate. In addition, a rec-assay with Bacillus subtilis (H17 and M45) was conducted simultaneously. The combination of both test systems verified very efficiently the absence of DNA damaging effects of the test substances. The method of this publication was described very well and was similar to the requirements of the OECD test guideline 471. In conclusion, the negative test result was considered to be reliable.
The result described by Suzuki (1983) supports this negative result. No mutagenic effects occurred to the two test strains TA 98 and TA 100 up to the highest tested concentration of 100 µg/plate under conditions similar to OECD 471. However, the analysis of only two strains and the lack of positive control data restrict the reliability of this study.
The study by Kawai (1987) also supports the negative result using the two test strains TA 98 and TA 100. Beside the result, no further data were extractable from the article as the major part of this literature is published in original language (Japanese) and thus the reliability of this source is considered as not assignable.
In contrast, Chiu (1978) analyzed two Salmonella thyphimurium strains (TA 98, TA 100) in a concentration range from 0.1 µmole (0.015 mg) to 1 µmole (0.15 mg) o-Nitrobenzaldehyde per plate and found positive AMES test results only for the test strain TA 98 without metabolic activation at concentrations of 1 µmole (0.15 mg) and 10 µmole (1.51 mg) per plate. Contrary to the OECD guideline 471, no tests with further bacterial test strains or with metabolic activation were conducted. Because these effect concentrations for mutagenicity are in the same range as the observed cytotoxicity effect concentrations published in the key study by Shimizu (1986) and because no purity of the test substance was provided, this study was considered as not reliable.
Based on the more reliable and supported negative mutagenic results it is concluded that the substance does not induce mutation in bacterial cells.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Four Ames Tests with the substance o-Nitrobenzaldehyde from the literature are available. Three (Shimizu 1986, Suzuki 1983, Kawai 1987) of them show negative results and one (Chiu 1978) a positive result.
The study published by Shimizu (1986) was the most reliable study and was selected as key.
The study of Chiu (1978) presenting the positive mutagenic effects was considered as not reliable because the test was conducted contrary to the OECD guideline 471 testing only two bacterial test strains without metabolic activation. Furthermore, the observed effect concentrations for mutagenicity are in the same range as the observed cytotoxicity effect concentrations published in the key study by Shimizu (1986) and no purity of the test substance was provided in this study.
Based on the more reliable and supported negative mutagenic results it is concluded that the substance does not induce mutation in bacterial cells.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)