Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08.06.2018 - 13.09.2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
Adopted July 21, 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C12-18 and C18-unsatd., reaction products with chloroacetic acid and 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol and N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine
EC Number:
295-171-3
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C12-18 and C18-unsatd., reaction products with chloroacetic acid and 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol and N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine
Cas Number:
91845-01-1
Molecular formula:
C24H48NO4, C25H51N2O3
IUPAC Name:
2-(dimethylamino)ethyl hexadecanoate; 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl octadecanoate; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]hexadecanamide; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]octadecanamide
Test material form:
solid: bulk

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver microsomal enzymes (S9 homogenate)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 µg/plate; to find the adequate dosage range.
Vehicle / solvent:
Ethanol (extra pure, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA); and ICR-191 (Sigma)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. A solubility test was performed based on visual assessment. The test item formed a clear (colorless) solution in ethanol. The stock solution was treated with ultrasonic waves until the test item had completely dissolved, except in the first experiment where the test item was already dissolved after a vortexing step only. Test item concentrations were used within 3.5 hours after preparation. Any residual volumes were discarded.
Rationale for test conditions:
According to guideline
Evaluation criteria:
A Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and/or Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:

a) The vehicle control and positive control plates from each tester strain (with or without S9-mix) must exhibit a characteristic number of revertant colonies when compared
against relevant historical control data generated at Charles River Den Bosch.

b) The selected dose-range should include a clearly toxic concentration or should exhibit limited solubility as demonstrated by the preliminary toxicity range-finding test or should
extend to 5 mg/plate.

c) No more than 5% of the plates are lost through contamination or some other unforeseen event. If the results are considered invalid due to contamination, the experiment will be repeated.
Statistics:
See page 44 of study report.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In conclusion, based on the results of this study it is concluded that 03590 is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

All bacterial strains showed negative responses over the entire dose-range, i.e. no significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants in two independently repeated experiments.

The strain-specific positive control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges indicating that the test conditions were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.

The negative control values were within the laboratory historical control data ranges, except the response for TA1537 in the absence of S9-mix in the second experiment.  However since the mean number of revertant colonies showed a characteristic number of revertant colonies (2 revertant colonies) when compared against relevant historical control data (3 revertant colonies), the validity of the test was considered to be not affected.