Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The studies were carried out in 2010.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl(3R,5S,6E)-7-{4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-(1-methylethyl)-2-[methyl(methylsulfonyl)amino]pyrimidin-5-yl}-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoate
Cas Number:
147118-40-9
Molecular formula:
C23H30FN3O6S
IUPAC Name:
Methyl(3R,5S,6E)-7-{4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-(1-methylethyl)-2-[methyl(methylsulfonyl)amino]pyrimidin-5-yl}-3,5-dihydroxyhept-6-enoate

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS- Source: LAB-ÁLL Bt. Budapest, Hungary- Weight at study initiation: 342-360 g - Housing: 2-3 animals in 42x42x19 cm macrolon cages- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, CuniFort Intensive Rabbit Diet Mixture (Tendre Ltd.)- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, potable water containing 50 mg/100 ml Ascorbic acid.- Acclimation period: 20 daysENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3 °C- Humidity (%): 30-70 %- Rate of air exchange: No data.- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: methyl cellulose (1%)
Concentration / amount:
Inradermal Induction Exposure (Main Study I): 1 % of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%)Control group: Vehicle only.Dermal Induction Exposure (Main Study II): 25% of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%)Control group: Vehicle only. Challenge Exposure (Main Study III): 10 % of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%) both in the test and control group.
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: methyl cellulose (1%)
Concentration / amount:
Inradermal Induction Exposure (Main Study I): 1 % of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%)Control group: Vehicle only.Dermal Induction Exposure (Main Study II): 25% of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%)Control group: Vehicle only. Challenge Exposure (Main Study III): 10 % of the test item homogenized in methyl cellulose (1%) both in the test and control group.
No. of animals per dose:
In the range finding study: 2 animals / 2 concentrations (2 concentrations in 1 animal: one on the right side and the other on the left side)Main study: test groups - 10 animals control group - 5 animals
Details on study design:
10 test animals were subjected to sensitization procedures in a two stage operation, i.e. intradermal treatment and a topical application.The test item was used in concentration of 1 % for intradermal injections and in concentration of 25 % for dermal sensitization treatment. Two weeks following the last induction exposure, a challenge dose (at concentration of 10%) was administered. Challenge was performed by dermal application of the test item.
Challenge controls:
5 control guinea pigs were simultaneously exposed to vehicle during the sensitization phase and they were treated with the test item (at concentration of 10 %) only in the case of challenge.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Incidence RatePositive response was observed in 60 % of the test animals after challenge with the test item. Positive response was observable in one control animal (20 %) 24 hours after the patch removal. Intensity of Sensitisation ResponseChallenge with the test item elicited discrete erythema in six out of ten animals (60%) on the skin surface of previously sensitized guinea pigs. The mean of the scores were 0.6 and 0.0 according to the 24 and 48 hour observations.In the control group the mean of the scores were 0.2 and 0.0.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10 %
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
discrete or patchy erythema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10 %. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: discrete or patchy erythema.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no visible change
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 10 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: no visible change.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10 %
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
discrete or patchy erythema
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10 %. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: discrete or patchy erythema.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
no visible change
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 10 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: no visible change.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
According to the results the substance should be classified in the EU as: Xi, R43 - May cause sensitisation by skin contact, and Skin Sens 1, H 317. May cause an allergic skin reaction.