Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-469-2 | CAS number: 27458-92-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- see justification attached to chapter 13
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modified Draize procedure:
Hartley strain albino guinea pigs were treated by intradermal injection to induce sensitization and challenged 2 weeks later by both intradermal injection and topical application. When there was no evidence of sensitization the induction and challenge procedures were repeated. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- other: modified Draize test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Test performed before LLNA guideline was available.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: from own colony (Unilever Research Laboratory, Great Britain)
- Weight at study initiation: about 350 g
- Housing: in pairs of the same sex
- Diet: pelleted guinea pig diet, cabbage, and hay; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum - Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- 2.5x the ICC = 0.25%
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- - injection challenge concentration (ICC): 0.1%;
- application challenge concentration (ACC): 10% - No. of animals per dose:
- 4 males, 6 females (or visa versa)
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Preliminary irritation test:
- Intradermal injection: Four animals of the same sex and weighing about 450 g were each injected intradermally on the shaved flanks with 0.1 ml aliquots of a range of concentrations of tests material in a suitable solvent. The reactions were examined for size (two largest diameters), erythema and edema 24 h later and the concentration giving slight but perceptible irritation with no edema was selected as the injection challenge concentration (ICC).
- Topical application: Aliquots (0.1 ml) of a range of concentrations of test substance in a suitable solvent were applied in small circular areas to the shaved flanks of 4 guinea pigs of the same sex and weighing about 450 g. The reactions were examined for erythema 24 h later and the highest concentration which caused no irritation was selected as the application challenge concentration (ACC).
MAIN STUDY:
10 guinea pigs were injected intradermally aliquots of 2.5 times the ICC at 4 sites which overlie the 2 auxillary and 2 inguinal lymph nodes. 14 days later each animal was challenged intradermally in one flank and topical in the other with 0.1 ml test substance preparation. The topical application was done by spreading 0.1 ml onto the shaven flank in a small circular area, which was not covered. 24 hours later the reactions were scored and apparent sensitization reactions were confirmed 7 days later by a second challenge with controls included. In the absence of sensitization reactions at first challenge the induction and challenge procedures were repeated, but this time a comfirmatory challenge with controls was included irrespective of any apparent sensitization reactions at the previous challenge.
Reactions were examined under a Philips color-matched unit with 3 Philips 40 W actinic blue 05 fluorescent tubes and 3 Philips 40 W white 35 fluorescent tubes. Each injection reaction was given a total score based on size (2 largest diameters), erythema and edema. Individual reactions were considered positive when their total score was significantly greater than the average total score for control reactions. Application reactions were scored on a 0 to +++ scale and individual reactions were considered positive if (a) they were + or greater and (b) there were no erythema reactions in controls. - Challenge controls:
- At each challenge with controls, 4 previously untreated animals of the same sex and weight were treated intradermally and topically on opposite flanks with 0.1 ml aliquots at the ICC and ACC respectively.
- Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Test performed before LLNA guideline was available.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- - Test species / strain / quality: Guinea pigs / Dunkin Hartley, Crl:HA
- Reasons for the selection of the test species: The guinea pig has been the animal of choice for predictive sensitization tests for several decades.
- Age on day 0: 5 – 9 weeks
- Sex: Female
- Supplier: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, Stolzenseeweg 32 – 36, 88353 Kisslegg
- Arrival in the testing facility: Acclimatization period (21 days before the first test-substance application)
- Identification: Ear tattoo
- Body weight on day 0: 401 g – 461 g
HOUSING CONDITIONS
- Room temperature / relative humidity: The animals were housed in fully air-conditioned rooms. Central air-conditioning guaranteed a range of 20 – 24°C for temperature and of 30 – 70% for relative humidity. There were no deviations from these ranges, which influenced the results of the study.
- Day / night rhythm: 12 h / 12 h (6.00 a.m. – 6.00 p.m. / 6.00 p.m. – 6.00 a.m.)
- Type of cage: Plastic cages from Tecniplast Deutschland GmbH (type 3020W009) with perforated base; floor area: 4000 cm²
- Enrichment: Wooden gnawing blocks (Typ NGM E-022); Abedd ® Lab. and Vet. Service GmbH Vienna, Austria
- Number of animals per cage: 5
- Feeding: Kliba Labordiät (Kaninchen & Meerschweinchenhaltung "GLP"), Provimi Kliba SA, Kaiseraugst, Basel, Switzerland ad libitum
- Drinking water: Tap water ad libitum - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- undiluted
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Concentration / amount:
- undiluted
- No. of animals per dose:
- Groups Number of animals
Control group 1 10
Control group 2 10
Test group 20 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS
In accordance with the cited Guidelines a slightly irritating concentration should be used in the main test for induction whereas the maximum non-irritant concentration should be applied for challenge.
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL of the test substance / test-substance preparation was applied to each animal.
- Occlusive dressing: 2 x 2 cm gauze patches (6 layers surgical gauze Ph. Eur. from Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG) containing the test substance / test-substance preparation were applied to the skin of the flanks under an occlusive dressing. The dressing consisted of rubberized linen patches (4 x 4 cm from Russka), patches of Idealbinde (5 x 5 cm from Pfälzische Verbandstoff-Fabrik) and Fixomull® Stretch (adhesive fleece) from Beiersdorf AG.
- Duration of exposure: 6 hours
- Application site: Right and left flank
- Application frequency: One application
-Number of test animals: 2 per test-substance concentration
-Readings: 1, 24 and 48 h after removal of the patch
MAIN STUDY
- Body weight determination: Individual body weights on day 0 and on the last day of observation (with the exception of the 2nd control group).
- Mortality: Twice each workday (beginning and end) and once on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays.
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
3 inductions were conducted.
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL of the test substance was applied to each animal.
- Occlusive dressing: 2 x 2 cm gauze patches (6 layers surgical gauze Ph. Eur. from Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG) containing the test substance were applied to the skin of the flank under an occlusive dressing. The dressing consisted of rubberized linen patches (4 x 4 cm from Russka), patches of Idealbinde (5 x 5 cm from Pfälzische Verbandstoff-Fabrik) and Fixomull® Stretch (adhesive fleece) from Beiersdorf AG.
- Duration of exposure: 6 hours
- Application site: Intact flank
- Application frequency: Three times at weekly intervals; days 0, 7 and 14 on the same application site
- Readings: 24 h after the removal of the patch
The control groups were not treated, since the test substance was applied undiluted and thus no vehicle was used.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
The challenge was carried out 14 days after the third induction.
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL of the test substance was applied to each animal. Occlusive dressing: 2 x 2 cm gauze patches (6 layers surgical gauze Ph. Eur. from Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG) containing the test substance were applied to the skin of the flank under an occlusive dressing. The dressing consisted of rubberized linen patches (4 x 4 cm from Russka), patches of Idealbinde (5 x 5 cm from Pfälzische Verbandstoff-Fabrik) and Fixomull® Stretch (adhesive fleece) from Beiersdorf AG.
- Duration of exposure: 6 hours
- Application site: Intact flank
- Readings: 24 and 48 h after the removal of the patch
The test group and control group 1 were treated with the test substance (control group 2 remained untreated). - Positive control substance(s):
- not required
- Remarks:
- However, a separate study is performed twice a year in the laboratory. The positive controls with Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, techn. 85% showed that the test system was able to detect sensitizing compounds under the laboratory conditions chosen.
- Group:
- test chemical
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Group: test group. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS AND ASSESSMENT OF FINDINGS
Pretest for selection of epidermal induction and challenge concentration:
The undiluted test substance and a 50% test substance preparation in acetone were tested. After application of both concentrations no skin irritation could be observed.
MAIN STUDY
Induction:
The inductions with the undiluted test substance caused the following skin reactions:
Skin findings |
Test group Inductions |
||
1st |
2nd |
3rd |
|
Grade 0 Grade 1 |
20/20 - |
20/20 - |
15/20 5/20 |
x/y: number of animals with findings / number of animals tested (reading 24 h after removal of the
patch)
Challenge:
The challenge with the undiluted test substance did not cause any skin reactions neither in animals of the control group 1 nor in test group animals 24 and 48 hours after removal of the patch.
Control group 2 that had been intended for a potential rechallenge, was not treated and therefore not reported.
Body weights:
The expected body weight gain was generally observed in the course of the study.
Data source
Materials and methods
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Isotridecan-1-ol
- EC Number:
- 248-469-2
- EC Name:
- Isotridecan-1-ol
- Cas Number:
- 27458-92-0
- Molecular formula:
- C13H28O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methyldodecan-1-ol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Isotridecanol
- Smile code: OCCCCCCCCCCC(C)C
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Results
- Key result
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.