2H-Indol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-1-phenyl-

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

Key study: OECD guideline 405 and EU method B.5. GLP study.
The test substance is considered as non-irritating for eyes. 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

Start: 08 January 2002 End : 11 January 2002

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: There are no deviations from the recommended guideline.

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)

Deviations:

no

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes

Species:

rabbit

Strain:

New Zealand White

Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Kisslegg, Germany.
- Age at study initiation: Animals used within the study were at least 6 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: 2247-2834 g
- Housing: Individually in labelled cages with perforated floors (Scanbur Denmark, dimensions 53.5x63x38.5 cm).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard laboratory rabbit diet (Charles River Breeding and Maintenance Diet for Rabbits, Altromin, Germany) approx. 100 g. per day.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions.


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21± 3ºC
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 15 air changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark per day.

IN-LIFE DATES: Start: 08 January 2002; End : 11 January 2002

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Controls:

other: The other eye remained untreated and served as the reference control.

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 42.5 (42.1 - 42.9) mg of the test substance (a volume of approximately 0.1 ml).

Duration of treatment / exposure:

The substance was not removed.

Observation period (in vivo):

The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test substance.

Number of animals or in vitro replicates:

3 males

Details on study design:

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):
- Time after start of exposure:


SCORING SYSTEM: Included in the Study Report.


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: lmmediately after the 24 hour observation, a solution of 2% fluorescein in water (adjusted to pH 7.0) was instilled into both eyes of each animal to quantitatively determine corneal epithelial damage. Any bright green stained area, indicating epithelial damage, was estimated as a percentage of the total corneal area.

Irritation parameter:

cornea opacity score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: 24-72 h

Score:

0

Irritation parameter:

iris score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: 24-72 h

Score:

0

Irritation parameter:

other: redness

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: 24-72 h

Score:

0.67

Irritation parameter:

chemosis score

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: 24-72 h

Score:

0

Irritation parameter:

other: discharge

Basis:

mean

Time point:

other: 24-72 h

Score:

0

Irritant / corrosive response data:

lnstillation of approximately 42.5 mg of the test substance (a volume of approximately 0.1 ml) into one eye of each of three rabbits resulted in irritation of the conjunctivae which was seen as redness, chemosis and discharge. The irritation had completely resolved within 48 hours in one animal and within 72 hours in the other two animals.
No iridial irritation or corneal opacity was observed, and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein, 24 hours after test substance instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage in any of the animals.

There was no evidence of ocular corrosion.

No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test substance was observed.
Remnants of the test substance were present in the eyes of all animals on day 1

Other effects:

No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals during the test period and no mortality occurred.

Table 7.3.2: Mean eye irritation scores

	Redness	Chemosis	Discharge	Opacity	Iris
1 hour	1.67	1	1	0	0
24 hours	1.33	0	0	0	0
48 hours	0.67	0	0	0	0
72 hours	0	0	0	0	0
Mean score 24-72 h	0.67	0	0	0	0

Interpretation of results:

not irritating

Remarks:

Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU

Conclusions:

Phenyloxindole is considered as non-irritating.

Executive summary:

Single samples of approximately 42.5 mg of Phenyloxindole (a volume of approximately 0.1 ml) were instilled into one eye of each of three rabbits. Observations were made 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation. lnstillation of the test substance resulted in irritation of the conjunctivae, which was seen as redness, chemosis and discharge. The irritation had completely resolved within 48 hours in one animal and within 72 hours in the other two animals. No iridial irritation or corneal opacity was observed, and treatment of the eyes with 2% fluorescein, 24 hours after test substance instillation revealed no corneal epithelial damage in any af the animals. Phenyloxindole is considered as non-irritating.

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Additional information

Key study: OECD guideline 405 and EU method B.5. GLP study.

The test substance is considered as non-irritating for eyes.

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Only one study available. Klimisch 1. This study was carried out in accordance with internationally valid GLP principles.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, the substance is not classified as an eye irritant.