Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Sensitisation:
Two in vivo studies are available.
Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA): It was conducted using method similar to OECD429. The highest SI (Stimulation Index) of 4.1 was calculated for 25% group and the test item was considered to have an EC3 value of 3%.
An in vivo skin sensitisation study was carried out in accordance with GB/T 21608-2008 which is similar to the BT method of OECD406.
Erythema and/or edema were not be found for the negative control and treatment group at 24 and 48 hours, after challenge and rechallenge exposure, the both sensitization rates were 0%.
Respiratory Sensitisation: No study available.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2010-03-31 to 2010-04-14
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable study report which meets basic scientific principles. 3 animals per group.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in Jul 2010
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3 animals per group
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- no more details
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Analytical purity: 100%
- Lot/batch No.: 10SC8156928-2-2 - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/JNCrlj
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories Japan Inc.
- Age at study initiation: approximately 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 19.87 - 25.18 g (range)
- Housing: animals were housed 3 per cage in suspended aluminium cages with stainless steel mesh front and floor, w176 x d302 x h130 mm (Yamato Scientific Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Cages were exchanged with washed, sterile cages every week.
- Diet: CRF-1 diet (Oriental Yeasy Co., Ltd., Japan), ad libitum
- Water: filtered tap water via an automatic water supply equipment (Labo Engineering Inc.), ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-25
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): more than 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- dimethyl sulphoxide
- Concentration:
- 1, 5, 25% (w/v)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 3 females
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: the highest concentration that could be technically used was a 25% suspension in DMSO.
- Irritation: Three mice (1 per dose group) were treated by epidermal application to the dorsal surface of each ear with 1, 5 and 25% concentrations of the test item once daily for 3 consecutive days from Day 0. The ears were assessed for skin irritation on Day 1, 2 and 5. On Day 5, the draining auricular lymph nodes from each ear were excised and weighed. No signs of local irritation was observed in the animals. No treatment-related effects on body weight were noted. The doses applied were selected as the doses to be used in the main study.
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: 3H-methyl thymidine incorporation determined by β-scintillation.
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
The test substance was considered to be positive for skin sensitisation when the SI ≥ 3.
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
25 μL of a 1, 5 and 25% concentration of the test substance in DMSO was applied to the dorsal surface of each ear of each mouse, for 3 consecutive days from Day 0. The control group was treated according to the same protocol with the vehicle alone. Local irritation reactions were assessed on Day 1 and 2. In addition, the body weight was measured on Day 1 and 5. On Day 5, 250 μL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 80 μCi/mL of 3H-methyl thymidine (3H-TdR) was injected into the tail vein of each control and treatment mouse. Five hours later, the animals were sacrificed and the draining auricular lymph node of each ear was excised and pooled.The level of 3H-TdR-incorporation was measured in a β-scintillation counter.
The body weight was determined on Day 0 and 5, prior to the treatment. - Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.5
- Test group / Remarks:
- 1%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 3.8
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 4.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25%
- Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
- Irritation was not observed and body weight gains were unaffected in all mice. Higher weights of auricular lymph nodes than vehicle control were observed and SI of 25% and 5% groups were higher than 3.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The simulation index (SI) for the control, 1, 5, and 25% concentration groups was 1.00, 1.5, 3.8 and 4.1, respectively. As the threshold value is 3, the test substance is considered to be a skin sensitiser. The estimated concentration expected to produce a simulation index of 3 (EC3 value) is 3%.
- Executive summary:
Skin sensitization potential of test item was evaluated in mice using the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) using method similar to OECD429. CBA/JNCrljmice (three females/group) received the test substance solution (2 5μL/ear)in DMSO at 25%, 5% or 1% on the dorsal surface of each ear.The highest SI (Stimulation Index) of 4.1 was calculated for 25% group and it was concluded that test item is a skin sensitizer under the conditions of this study and the test item was considered to have an EC3 value of 3%.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- From 2014-09-25 to 2014-11-07
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: GB/T 21608-2008 Chemicals-Test Method of Skin Sensitization
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- authorized by CNAS
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- This in vivo skin sensitisation study was carried out before 10 May 2017, and that in compliance with Chinese GB/T 21608-2008.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Purity: 100.0%
- Lot No.: KNC110310 - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Alnimo Laboratory Animal cultivation center, Kunming
- Weight at study initiation: 251- 295 g
- Housing: housed in common environment
- Diet: AIl of the feeds were supplied by Tianqin Biotechnology Ltd., Changsha
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21-22
- Humidity (%): 57-67 - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: 1 % methylcellulose solution
- Concentration / amount:
- 1 g/mL, 0.4 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- at 0th, 7th and 14th day, exposure for 6 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: non-irritant substance
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: 1 % methylcel1ulose solution
- Concentration / amount:
- 1g/mL, 0.5 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- At the 14th day after the latest induction exposure, exposure for 6h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No.:
- #2
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: 1 % methylcellulose solution
- Concentration / amount:
- 1g/mL, 0.5 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- at 21st days / 6h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- Treatment group: 20
Negative control group: 10 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
The highest mild-irritant and nonirritant concentration were determined using 2 Albino Guinea Pig.
MAIN STUDY
- Grouping The negative control group and treatment group were set up in the test, and the number animals for per group were 10 and 20 respectively.
- Dose: According to the result of the preliminary test, the test substance was no irritation. Thereby the concentration of the test substance for induction and challenge was 100%. The volume of the exposure was 0.4 mL and 0.5 mL each animals for induction and challenge respectively. The negative control group was only challenged by test substance.
- Treatment of the test substance: An amount of test item was grinded and then diluted into required concentration 1 g/mL for the test with 1 % methylcel1ulose solution.
- Preparation of test area: Approximately 24 h before the test, about 3 cm x 3 cm areas of fur was removed from both left and right sides of the animals dorsal.
- Exposure:
- Induction exposure: At the 0th, 7thand 14th day, the test substance of 0.4 mL was dropped on the filter paper (2 cm x2 cm) which was applied to the left shaved area, and then covered with 2 ply gauzes and 1 ply paper and held with nonirritating tape for 6 h for each animal in the treatment group. At the end of the exposure period, residual test substance was removed using water.
- Challenge exposure: At the 14th day after the latest induction exposure. The test substance of 0.5 mL was dropped on the filter paper (2 cm x 2 cm) which was applied to the right shaved area, and then covered with 2 ply gauzes and 1 ply paper and held with nonirritating tapes for 6 h for each animal in the negative control and treatment group. After being removed the residual test substance, skin reactions were observed at the 24 and 48 hours. Because of no immune response, rechallenge was done with the same method after 7 days.
- Observation: The health condition and poisoning symptom was observed during the testing period. Skin reactions were graded and recorded at 24 and 48 hours after the challenge and rechallenge exposures. - Challenge controls:
- The negative control group was only challenged by test substance.
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1 g/mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- The animals were fine during the testing period
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1g/mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- The animals were fine during the testing period
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1g/mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- The animals were fine during the testing period
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1 g/mL
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- The animals were fine during the testing period
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- other: Challenge and rechallenge
- Group:
- negative control
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- The animals were fine during the testing period
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- The results was that of challenge and/or rechallenge of 24 and 48 hours in tanale
- Reading:
- other: Challenge and rechallenge
- Group:
- positive control
- No. with + reactions:
- 18
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Remarks:
- The results was that of challenge and/or rechallenge of 24 and 48 hours in tanale
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- faint sensitization
- Conclusions:
- The skin sensitization rate was 0%, and skin sensitization degree of test item was faint sensitization.
- Executive summary:
The potential that body produces skin reactions and the sensitization of immunity transfer after the guinea pig exposed repeatedly to test item were determined in accordance with GB/T 21608-2008.
Erythema and/or edema were not be found for the negative control and treatment group at 24 and 48 hours, after challenge and rechallenge exposure, the both sensitization rates were 0%.
Referenceopen allclose all
For the control, 1, 5, and 25% concentration groups, the DPM values per lymph node were 1554, 2314, 5887 and 6346, respectively. As the lymph nodes were pooled, these results were determined by dividing the measured value by the number of lymph nodes pooled.
Erythema and/or edema were not be found for the negative control and treatment group at 24 and 48 hours, after challenge and rechallenge exposure, the both sensitization rates were 0%.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin sensitisation:
in vivo: LLNA, similar to OECD429, SI max: 4.1> 3, EC3 value: 3%, sensitizing
Skin sensitization, similar to OECD406, sensitization rates: 0%; not sensitizing
Respiratory sensitisation: No data available, not minimum required data.
Classification:
Skin: The highest SI (Stimulation Index) was > 3 and EC3 value was 3% in the murine local lymph node assay. Based on criteria from Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and amendments and Globally Harmonized System Of Classification And Labelling Of Chemicals (GHS) section 3.4.2.2.3, the substance should be classified as category 1B for skin sensitiser.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.