Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 1983
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Report date:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
internal substance code
IUPAC Name:
internal substance code
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
The test article was a brown viscous liquid supplied in a glass screw-capped bottle labelled P5240. The test article was stored at room temperature in the dark. Information supplied by the study sponsor indicated the test article was stable under normal conditions.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species, strain and supplier:
Three young adult female New Zealand White rabbits obtained from Morton Commerical Rabbits, Parsonage Road, Stansted, Essex, were used for the study.

Specification:
At the start of the study the rabbits weighed between 2.55 and 2.83 kg and were at least 11 weeks old. They were acclimatised to the laboratory environment for at least 3 days and were examined for signs of ill health or injury shortly before the study commenced. All animals appeared healthy and no animals were rejected.

Husbandry:
The animals were individually housed in grid floor cages in a single air conditioned room at a temperature between 18 and 20°C and a relative humidity between 51 and 62%. The animals were exposed to a constant daily photoperiod of 14 hours artificial light (06.00 - 20.00) and 10 hours darkness. Temperature and humidity were recorded twice daily on weekdays and once daily at week-ends.

Diet and drinking water:
The animals were allowed free access to mains water and food (Standard Rabbit Diet, Special Diets Services Ltd., Stepfield, Witham, Essex) throughout the study.

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: clipped the day prior to treatment
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
The test article was melted by warming to approximately 70°C. The test article was allowed to cool to approximately 37°C at
which temperature it was sufficiently liquid to be administered by a 1 ml syringe. The test article concentration applied was 0.5 ml undiluted.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
72 hours
Number of animals:
3 female rabbits
Details on study design:
Treatment procedure:
The back of each animal was clipped free of hair the day prior to treatment using electric veterinary clippers. A portion of test article (0.5 ml) was applied to an area of skin approximately 6 cm2 on each animal and covered with a gauze patch. The patch was occluded and secured using a strip of impermeable adhesive tape. A plastic collar was placed around the neck of each animal to
prevent premature removal of the wrappings and ingestion of the test article. Four hours after application the patches were
removed and the skin wiped with a disposable paper towel moistened with water to remove any test article still remaining.

Evaluation of effects:
One hour after removal of the wrappings the skin reactions were scored using the Draize scale. The evaluation was repeated 24,48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches. No irritation was noted at the 72 hour observation and the study was terminated.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
All treated skin sites appeared normal throughout the study period. A primary irritation index of 0 was obtained. The test item was regarded as non-irritant to rabbit skin. No corrosive effects were noted.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test item was classified as a non-irritant to rabbit skin.
Executive summary:

A study was performed to determine the primary skin irritation index and corrosive effects of the test item in the New Zealand White rabbit. The study design was based on OECD Guidelines No. 404. Three female rabbits were tested and 0.5 ml test substance applied undiluted onto the clipped skin area of the animals. A single 4 -hour application produced a primary irritation index of 0. The test item was classified as a non-irritant to rabbit skin. No corrosive effects were noted.