Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key, guinea pig maximisation test, read across to 3,4 dichloroaniline, positive


Supp, QSAR, Danish QSAR database, battery model, positive

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
please see attached justification statement
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

5 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

none
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

5 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:

4 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

5 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

1 animal with dicrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

5 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
14
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:

14 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

25 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

5 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

25 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
17
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
17 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

25 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
8
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

7 animals with discrete or patchy erythema, 1 animal with moderate and confluent erythema
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

25 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
19
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:

13 animals with discrete or patchy erythema, 6 animals with moderate and confluent erythema
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

50 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

7 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

50 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
18
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:

11 animals with discrete or patchy erythema, 4 animals with moderate and confluent erythema and 3 animals with intense erythema and swelling
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:

50 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:

9 animals with discrete or patchy erythema
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:

50 % 3,4-dichloroaniline in propylene glycol
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:

15 animals with moderate to confluent erythema; 5 animals with discrete or patchy erythema

During the range finding test for the challenge concentration acute dermal toxicity was observed after simultaneous exposure of each of five guinea pigs to 4 occlusive gauze patches treated with either 0.5 mL 6, 12, 25 or 50 % 3,4 -dichloroaniline in propylene glycol. Two animals were found dead after 24 h and the remaining three were euthanized for animal welfare reasons due to severe signs of toxicity.



 

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
3,4 -dichloroaniline was found to be sensitising in this guinea pig maximisation test.
Executive summary:

3,4 -dichloroaniline was tested for skin sensitisation according to OECD Guideline 406 in a Magnusson and Kligman test in male guinea pigs. Although irritation was also evident in the control group after challenge or rechallenge with either 50, 25 or 5 % 3,4 -dichloroaniline in propylene glycol (w/w) the incidence and severity of irritation was always higher in the induced test group. Therefore 3,4 -dichloroaniline was concluded to be sensitising in this guinea pig maximisation test. Based on the read across approach, this result is also fully applicable to the registered substance 2,4 -dichloroaniline (for more information please refer to the Read Across Statement attached in Section 13).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)
Additional information:

Guinea pig maximisation Test - Read across to 3,4 -dichloroaniline


3,4 -dichloroaniline was tested for skin sensitisation according to OECD Guideline 406 in a Magnusson and Kligman test in male guinea pigs. Although irritation was also evident in the control group after challenge or rechallenge with either 50, 25 or 5 % 3,4 -dichloroaniline in propylene glycol (w/w) the incidence and severity of irritation was always higher in the induced test group. Therefore 3,4 -dichloroaniline was concluded to be sensitising in this guinea pig maximisation test. Based on the read across approach, this result is also fully applicable to the registered substance 2,4 -dichloroaniline (for more information please refer to the Read Across Statement attached in Section 13).


QSAR prediction


Skin sensitisation was predicted using the models Sci QSAR and CASE ULtra implemented in the Danish data base and the OECD QSAR toolbox v4.5. Positive indication of skin sensitisation was given by these QSAR predictions. The final result was drawn from the overall prediction of the battery model that contains 3 different models, for skin sensitisation implemented in the Danish QSAR database. For the Sci QSAR model and the CASE Ultra QSAR model the substance was predicted positive and the predictions fall in the applicability domain. The third model of the battery (Leadscope) could not make a prediction, as the substance was out of the applicability domain of the model.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available information, the registered substance is classified as skin sens 1 (H317) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.