Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-952-0 | CAS number: 548-61-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,4',4''-methylidynetrianiline
- EC Number:
- 208-952-0
- EC Name:
- 4,4',4''-methylidynetrianiline
- Cas Number:
- 548-61-8
- Molecular formula:
- C19H19N3
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,4',4''-methylidynetrianiline
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: F. Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: mean weight of about 28-42 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard pellet feed ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water from bottles; ad libitum
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil (test substance); water (positive control)
- Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg bw for test substance and 10 mL/kg bw for positive control - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance was suspended in corn oil. The stability in the vehicle was analytically verified for at least 24 hours.
The selection of the test substance dose was based on a pilot test, in which groups of five animals, including both males and females, were intraperitoneally administered 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg in cremophor emulsion and 750 mg/kg, 1000 mg/kg (two groups), 1500 mg/kg and
2500 mg/kg test substance in corn oil. The following symptoms were recorded for up to 48 hours, starting at 500 mg/kg: apathy, increased motility, uncoordinated movements, roughened fur, staggering gait, spasm, extension spasm, rolling over and orange to red discolored urine. A cremophor suspension could not be used as vehicle due to instability of the test substance suspension.
Based on these results, 750 mg/kg bw test substance was chosen as MTD for this test. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single intraperitoneal administration
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- 16, 24 and 48 h sampling time for treatment group; negative and positive control groups only 24 h
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
750 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: i. p.
- Doses / concentrations: 20 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- At least one intact femur was prepared from each sacrificed animal. The bone marrow was prepared and centrifuged in calf serum. The numbers of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) with and without micronuclei (MN) were counted.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: One drop of the cell suspension resulting from centrifugation was used to prepare smears. Dried slides were automatically stained with an Ames Hema-Tek Slide Stainer from the Miles Company. The slides were then 'destained' with methanol and rinsed with deionized water.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: A total of 1000 PCE (with and without micronuclei) from each animal were evaluated. The number of NCEs per 1000 PCEs was noted. The number of NCE showing micronuclei was also counted. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test was considered positive if, at any of the intervals, there was a relevant and significant increase in the number of polychromatic erythrocytes showing micronuclei in comparison to the negative control.
A test was considered negative if there was no relevant or significant increase in the rate of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes at any time. A test was also considered negative if there was a significant increase in that rate which, according to the laboratory's experience was within the range of negative controls.
In addition, a test was considered equivocal if there was an increase of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes above the range of attached historical negative controls, provided the increase was not significant and the result of the negative control was not closely related to the data of the respective treatment group. In this case, a second test had to be performed at the most sensitive interval. - Statistics:
- The test substance group(s) with the highest mean (provided this superseded the negative control mean) and the positive control were checked by Wilcoxon's non-parametric rank sum test with respect to the number of polychromatic erythrocytes having micronuclei and the number of normochromatic erythrocytes. A variation was considered statistically significant if its error probability was below 5 % and the treatment group figure was higher than that of the negative control.
The rate of normochromatic erythrocytes containing micronuclei was examined if the micronuclear rate for polychromatic erythrocytes was already relevantly increased. In this case, the group with the highest mean was compared with the negative control using the one-sided chiz-test. A variation was considered statistically significant if the error probability was below 5 % and the treatment group figure was higher than that of the negative control. In addition, standard deviations (1s ranges) were calculated for all the means.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Toleration by the animals:
After single intraperitoneal administration of 750 mg/kg test substance, treated animals showed the following compound-related symptoms until sacrifice: apathy, roughened fur, spasm and orange to red discoloured urine. Their feeding behaviour was normal. There were no substance-induced mortalities. No symptoms were recorded for the control groups. No animals died in these groups.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Treatment group |
Dose [mg/kg] |
Dissection interval [h] |
Mean MN-PCE [‰ ± SE] |
Mean MN-NCE [‰ ± SE] |
PCE/NCE |
Corn oil |
0 |
24 |
1.9 ± 1.7 |
1.5 ± 0.8 |
1000/1173 |
test substance |
750.0 |
16 |
2.1 ± 1.0 |
1.8 ± 1.1 |
1000/1073 |
750.0 |
24 |
2.7 ± 1.4 |
1.4 ± 1.5 |
1000/1380 |
|
750.0 |
48 |
2.2 ± 1.1 |
2.0 ± 1.0 |
1000/1537 |
|
Cyclophosphamide |
25.0 |
24 |
16.2* ± 5.2 |
1.8 ± 1.6 |
1000/899 |
* P < 0.01 in non-parametric Wilcoxon ranking test
The test substance does not show any chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) effect in the bone marrow cells of mice.
The administration of the test substance led to clinical signs such as apathy, roughened fur, spasms and orange to red discoloured urine. The PCE/NCE ratio in the 48 hour dissection interval group was considered to be an indication for a biologically relevant weak toxic effect in the bone marrow, although not statistically significant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
- Executive summary:
A micronucleus test on male and female NMRI mice was performed according to OECD TG 474 to investigate potential clastogenic effects of the test item. Groups of 5 mice/sex received a single intraperitoneal injection of either the test substance (750 mg/kg bw), the vehicle (corn oil), or the positive control substance cyclophosphamide (20 mg/kg bw). The femoral marrow of the groups treated with the test item was prepared 16, 24 and 48 hours after administration.
All animals treated with the test item showed symptoms of toxicity after treatment, as apathy and roughened fur. A weak altered ratio between poly- and normochromatic erythrocytes in the 48 h treated group pointed to exposure of the bone marrow. No indications of clastogenic effects of the test item were found. Thus, the test item was not clastogenic under the conditions of this test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.