Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: according to OECD 476

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Guideline:
EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
Guideline:
other: Japanese Guidelines: Kanpoan No. 287, Environment Protection Agency; Eisei No. 127, Ministry of Health and Welfare; Heisei 09/10/31 Kikyoku No. 2, Ministry of International Trade and Industry
Principles of method if other than guideline:
first experiment 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation
second experiment 24 hours treatment without metabolic activation and 4 hours treatment with metabolic activation
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
C-SAT 080094
IUPAC Name:
C-SAT 080094
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Silicic acid, sodium salt
EC Number:
215-687-4
EC Name:
Silicic acid, sodium salt
Cas Number:
1344-09-8
Molecular formula:
Na2O x (SiO2)n with Molar Ratio (MR) (SiO2/Na2O): 1.5 – 4
IUPAC Name:
Silicic acid, sodium salt
Details on test material:
Identity: C-SAT 080094; Sodium silicate solution (weight ratio 3.35)
Tradename: Natronwasserglas 37/40PE (Sodium Silicate 37/40PE, aqueous Sodium
Silicate Solution WR 3.35)
Batch No.: 248908210
Molecular Weight: 263 g/mol
Purity: 36% active ingredient, 64% water
Stability in Solvent: Not indicated by the sponsor
Storage: At room temperature
Expiration Date: September 10, 2009

On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was dissolved in deionised water.
The final concentration of deionised water in the culture medium was 10 % v/v.
In the pre-experiment the pH at the three highest concentrations was adjusted with 2N hydrochloric acid.

Method

Target gene:
HPRT
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 28.1; 56.3; 112.5; 225.0; 337.5; 450 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 56.3; 112.5; 225.0; 450.0; 675.0; 900.0 µg/mL
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 28.1; 56.3; 112.5; 225.0; 450.0; 675.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 112.5; 225.0; 450.0; 900.0; 1350.0; 1800 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
water
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Remarks:
Migrated to IUCLID6: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium


DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours with and without metabolic activation in experiment 1, 24 hours without metaoblic activation in experiment 2
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 72 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Thioguanine

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: >1,5x10exp.6

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency


Evaluation criteria:
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration- related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation fre¬quency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.

However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corre-sponding negative control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate in the range normally found (0.5 – 31.8 mutants per 10exp.6 cells) a concentration-related in-crease of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of negative and solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration.

Statistics:
Linear regression analysis (least squares) .

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary Table

 

 

relative

relative

mutant

 

relative

relative

mutant

 

 

conc. µg

S9

cloning

cloning

colonies/

induction

cloning

cloning

colonies/

induction

 

per mL

mix

efficiency I

efficiency II

106 cells

factor

efficiency I

efficiency II

106 cells

factor

 

 

%

%

 

%

%

 

column

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Experiment I / 4 h treatment

culture I

culture II

Solvent control with water

-

100.0

100.0

 18.4

1.0

100.0

100.0

 17.1

1.0

Positive control with

150.0

-

 76.2

 94.8

137.7

7.5

 84.7

 86.2

132.3

7.7

Test item

28.1

-

 98.4

114.2

 15.4

0.8

 92.7

104.2

 13.0

0.8

Test item

56.3

-

100.0

110.3

 12.0

0.7

 97.1

 98.0

 16.8

1.0

Test item

112.5

-

102.8

101.8

 16.7

0.9

 88.2

 96.3

 15.5

0.9

Test item

225.0

-

 87.2

102.0

 21.5

1.2

 76.9

 95.5

 19.9

1.2

Test item

337.5

-

  0.2

 98.4

 14.6

0.8

  8.8

 89.2

 20.5

1.2

Test item

450.0

-

  0.0

culture was not continued#

  0.0

culture was not continued#

Solvent control with water

+

100.0

100.0

 24.6

1.0

100.0

100.0

 17.9

1.0

Positive control with DMBA

 1.1

+

 43.9

 89.0

636.4

25.9

 36.6

 99.5

620.9

34.7

Test item

56.3

+

 94.4

culture was not continued##

 97.3

culture was not continued##

Test item

112.5

+

 89.5

 94.1

 16.9

0.7

 95.7

105.9

 22.3

1.2

Test item

225.0

+

 94.1

 89.8

 17.6

0.7

 94.2

 85.8

 20.6

1.2

Test item

450.0

+

 84.7

 90.5

 16.3

0.7

 94.5

 81.5

 20.9

1.2

Test item

675.0

+

 88.5

114.3

 13.2

0.5

 93.6

 92.6

 17.9

1.0

Test item

900.0

+

 85.0

 85.7

 27.8

1.1

 92.9

 96.4

 15.5

0.9

Experiment II / 24 h treatment

culture I

culture II

Solvent control with water

-

100.0

100.0

 13.7

1.0

100.0

100.0

 14.1

1.0

Positive control with

75.0

-

 92.5

 97.7

132.5

9.7

102.2

 93.2

105.6

7.5

Test item

28.1

-

104.7

culture was not continued##

101.8

culture was not continued##

Test item

56.3

-

102.5

 95.7

 16.9

1.2

102.2

 69.3

 18.8

1.3

Test item

112.5

-

 88.0

 94.5

 17.4

1.3

102.7

 97.8

  9.0

0.6

Test item

225.0

-

 95.1

 88.7

 23.2

1.7

102.0

 71.3

 17.4

1.2

Test item

450.0

-

 94.1

 84.2

 23.6

1.7

101.4

 65.3

 17.7

1.3

Test item

675.0

-

 43.3

 90.9

 16.2

1.2

102.9

 63.5

 28.4

2.0

Experiment II / 4 h treatment

culture I

culture II

Solvent control with water

+

100.0

100.0

 13.7

1.0

100.0

100.0

 16.1

1.0

Positive control with DMBA

 1.1

+

 55.9

 73.5

809.9

59.1

 51.2

 78.8

595.5

36.9

Test item

112.5

+

114.6

 78.2

 20.1

1.5

 95.6

 90.4

 22.6

1.4

Test item

225.0

+

 91.3

101.5

 24.6

1.8

107.2

 98.0

 14.5

0.9

Test item

450.0

+

 95.5

109.1

 22.9

1.7

 99.1

 83.9

 20.5

1.3

Test item

900.0

+

111.7

 99.4

 26.1

1.9

112.6

 80.5

 20.8

1.3

Test item

1350.0

+

 10.6

100.7

 11.4

0.8

  7.4

102.9

  8.8

0.5

Test item

1800.0

+

  0.0

culture was not continued#

  0.0

culture was not continued#

#     culture not continued due to exceedingly strong toxic effects

##    culture was not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
Therefore, C-SAT 080094 is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
Executive summary:

The study was performed to investigate the potential of C-SAT 080094 to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster.

The assay was performed in three independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The experimental part without metabolic activation was terminated prematurely due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects even al low concentrations. This part of the first experiment was repeated in experiment IA using a lower concentration range. The data of the repeat experiment IA are included in the first experiment.

The second experiment was performed in the absence of metabolic activation with a treatment period of 24 hours and in the presence of metabolic activation with a treatment period of 4 hours.

The highest applied concentration in the pre-test on toxicity (7300 µg/mL) was based on the purity of the test item (36 % active ingredient). The dose range of the main experiments was limited by toxicity of the test item.

No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in both main experiments.

Appropriate reference mutagens, used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test item and the activity of the metabolic activation system.