Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442B (Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/JN and CBA/J
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Sex: Females (nulliparous and non-pregnant)
Age and weight range (at order): 7 to 8 weeks old, 21 to 25 grams
Weight range at arrival : 19 to 20 grams
Acclimatisation period : At least 5 days
No. of animals/cage : 1/cage during the study; up to 5 during acclimatisation
Housing : Polysulphone solid bottomed cages measuring 35.5 x 23.5 x 19 cm with nesting material
Cage tray control : Daily inspected and changed as necessary (at least twice/week)


Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
50, 25, 10, 5 and 2.5% w/w
No. of animals per dose:
6
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: 1.68
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Not measured
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Magnesium hexafluorosilicate hexahydrated is not a skin sensitiser
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification