Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 277-552-6 | CAS number: 73612-29-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Pigment Red 57(Sr) is not genotoxic as assessed both with standard Ames tests and the modified Prival assay (OECD 471, GLP, BASF 1992 and DIC 2005) and with the chromosome aberration study in vitro (OECD 473, GLP, DIC 2005). Furthermore, the analogue Ca-salt Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) is not mutagenic in mammalian cells in vitro (OECD 476, GLP, Wollny 2008) and does not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in human fibroblasts and primary hepatocytes from arochlor 1253-induced rats (OECD 482, GLP, Hertner 1987 and Meyer 1987).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please see the category read-across justification in the category object.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Highest tested concentration caused precipitation but was less than 5 mg/plate. Both experiments performed with pre-incuation method.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Strontium 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2-sulphonatophenyl)azo}-2-naphthoate
- Substance type: red pigment
- Physical state: solid
Degree of solubility
Water: <50 mg/mL (measured at Hita Laboratory)
DMSO: <50 mg/mL (measured at Hita Laboratory)
- Other: Supplier DAINIPPON INK AND CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED - Target gene:
- histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Range-finding test with all strains: 4.88, 19.5, 78.8, 313, 1250 and 5000 μg/plate
- Main test 1 and 2: 7.88, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156 and 313 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle: DMSO; the test substance was insoluble in distilled water at 50 mg/mL and it was a good suspension in DMSO at 50 mg/mL. The test substance suspension of 50 mg/mL prepared with DMSO was considered to be stable there from the facts being neither any change in color nor heating at room temperature within 2 hours after preparation. Therefore, DMSO was preferably selected as a solvent.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-(2-Furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide & 2-Methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)-aminopropylamino]acridine dihydrochlorid
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Amino acid requirement, sensitivity to ultraviolet-rays, rfa membrane mutation, presence or absence of plasmid pKM101 and negative and positive control values of test strains were examined. Spectrophotometric grade of dimethyl sulfoxide was added to fresh overnight cultures of the test strains which had been confirmed to have these properties at a ratio of 0.9:10. The mixture was frozen as a stock culture in an ultradeep freezer below -80°C.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was judged positive when the number of revertant colonies increased twice or more that of the negative control in a dose-dependent manner and a reproducibility of the test results was also assured. In all other cases, it was judged negative.
- Statistics:
- Any statistical methods were not used.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No genotoxicity was observed in the range-finder test that was performed in all strains with concentrations up to 5 mg/plate. Precipitation was observed at concentrations of 313 μg/plate and above.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Osmolarity not measured.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- other: in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Strontium 3-hydroxy-4-[(4-methyl-2-sulphonatophenyl)azo}-2-naphthoate
- Substance type: red pigment
- Physical state: solid
Degree of solubility
Water: <50 mg/mL (measured at Hita Laboratory)
DMSO: <50 mg/mL (measured at Hita Laboratory)
Acetone < 472 mg/mL (measured at Hita Laboratory)
- Other: Supplier DAINIPPON INK AND CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED - Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese Hamster lung fibroblast CHL/IU
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - Short-term treatment without S9 mix: 75, 150, 300, 600, 1200 and 2400 μg/ml
- Short-term treatment with S9 mix: 37.5, 75, 150, 300, 600, 1200 and 2400 μg/ml
- Continuous treatment, no S9 mix: 26.3, 39.5, 59.3, 88.9, 133 and 200 μg/ml
In the range-finder studies, precipitation of the pigment and red discoloration of the medium was observed even at the lowest dose of 18.4 μg/ml both in the absence and presence of S9 mix, both at the 6h and 24h treatments. - Vehicle / solvent:
- 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose in water; this formed a more homogenous suspenstion than DMSO and acetone.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Exposure duration: 6h (short) or 24h (continous)
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24h
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Demecolcin (2h prior to fixation)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 metaphases per dose
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth (cell counting after trypsination using a Microcell counter)
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes (Cells with more than 38 chromosomes)
OTHER: Cells were free of mycoplasma, had 25 chromosomes per cell and a population doubling time of about 15h. The incidence of spontaneous chromosomes was less than 5%. - Evaluation criteria:
- - Cells with more than 38 chromosomes were judged as having a numerical aberration.
- A rate of more than 10% of cells with numerical aberrations was counted as positive.
- A rate of more than 5% structural aberrations was counted as positive.
- Effects had to show a dose-response relationship. - Statistics:
- Any statistical methods were not used.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- other: clastogenicity negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- other: polyploidy positive at precipitating and cytotoxic concentrations.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not applicable
- Additional information on results:
- IC50 (24h) = 75 μg/mL
IC50 (6h, without S9 mix) = 240 μg/mL
IC50 (6h, with S9 mix) = 480 μg/mL
Precipitation of the test item was observed at all concentrations at the start and at the beginning of the treatment incubation and also at the end of the culture. In the range-finder studies, precipitation of the pigment and red discoloration of the medium was observed even at the lowest dose of 18.4 μg/ml both in the absence and presence of S9 mix, both at the 6h and 24h treatments.
Measurement of pH confirmed that medium discoloration was no effect of a change in pH.
- Numerical abberrations occured in the absence of S9 mix after 6h treatment: incidence of 16.5, 18.5 and 34% at 75, 150 and 300 μg/mL, respectively.
- Numerical abberrations occured in the presence of S9 mix after 6h treatment: incidence of 5.5, 11 and 14% at 150, 300 and 600 μg/mL, respectively.
- Numerical abberrations occured after 24h treatment: incidence of 17, 21 and 26 % at 39.5, 59.3 and 88.9 μg/mL, respectively.
The numerical aberrations are clearly above the incidence of the historical control data given in the attachment of the study report. No increase in numerical aberrations were noted in the range-finder studies at 18.4 μg/ml both in the absence and presence of S9 mix
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In vitro mutagenicity in bacteria
The mutagenicity in vitro was assessed in two tests applying both the standard assay with rat liver homogenate and the modified assay for azo compounds (Prival-assay). The studies were performed following the latest OECD testing guideline (OECD 471) and the principles of GLP. The standard test was performed with doses of 7.88, 19.5, 39.1, 78.1, 156 and 313 μg/plate using the pre-incubation method and DMSO as vehicle, and included all five tester strains (DIC 2005a). The assay with the Prival modification was performed with Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and doses of 0, 20, 100, 500, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate in DMSO were applied (BASF AG 1992).
In vitro mutagenicity in mammalian cells
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells in vitro was investigated with the calcium analogue Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) in an hprt test following OECD testing guideline 476 (adopted July 21, 1997) and the principles of GLP. No indication of a mutagenic effect was observed at concentrations up to 1000 µg/mL, the two highest concentrations being in the precipitating range. This is consistent with the absence of unscheduled DNA synthesis of the calcium analogue as tested with both with human fibroblasts (Meyer 1987) and with primary hepatocytes prepared from Arochlor1254-induced rats (Hertner 1987). The latter studies were performed under GLP and in combination fulfil the requirements of OECD testing guideline 482 (adopted October 23, 19869. For the DNA-repair assays, concentrations were in similar range and also resulted in precipitation. Higher concentrations were too toxic for scoring. For all three studies, commercial samples of known composition were tested.
In vitro clastogenicity in mammalian cells
For clastogenicity in vitro, experimental data from studies with samples of Pigment Red 57(Sr) and the analogues Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) and 63:3(Sr) were taken into account.
For Pigment Red 57(Sr), clastogenicity in mammalian cells was investigated in a guideline (OECD 473. adopted July 21, 1997) and GLP compliant study (DIC 2005). Purity of the test sample is adequate. Pigment Red 57-Sr was applied as a suspension in 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose in water. Precipitation of the test item was observed at all concentrations at the start and at the beginning of the incubation and the test item coloured the culture medium red. In the range-finding test concentrations as low as 18.5 μg/mL caused precipitation as well as culture medium colouration. For the main study, the highest dose was chosen based on a reduction in growth rate by less than 50%, and so all doses were in the precipitating range. A dose-dependent increase in numerical aberrations occurred in the absence and presence of S9 mix after 6h and 24h treatment in parallel to cytotoxicity. This increase was above the historical control range and could not be attributed to a change in pH. Changes in osmolality also cause chromosome breaks in cell culture studies, but osmolality was not measured in this study. After 24h treatment, the incidence of numerical aberrations was 17, 21 and 26 % at 39.5, 59.3 and 88.9 μg/mL, respectively. Higher concentrations could not be scored because the precipitates were too numerous. In the presence of S9 mix after 6h treatment, the incidence was 5.5, 11 and 14% at 150, 300 and 600 μg/mL, respectively. In the absence of S9 mix after 6h treatment, the incidence was 16.5, 18.5 and 34% at 75, 150 and 300 μg/mL, respectively. As cultured cells are sensitive to mechanical effects of precipitates and no doses in the non-precipitating range were tested, the relevance of the increase in polyploidy index is questionable. A concomitant increase in cytotoxicity and polyploidy index indicates that the actual pigment component is very unlikely to be the cause.
Experimental data on chromosome aberration in vitro was available for a related strontium BONA metal laked pigment Pigment Red 63:3(Sr) and the calcium analogue Pigment Red 57:1(Ca). The strontium analogue Pigment Red 63:3(Sr) (3-hydroxy-4-[(1-sulfonato-2-naphthyl)azo]-2-naphthoate) contains a sulfonated naphthyl ring instead of a sulfonated phenyl ring. A GLP and OECD guideline 473 compliant study showed absence of structural aberrations for both Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) (Hoffmann 2008 and MHLW 1993) and 63:3(Sr) (DIC 2008). As determined in the course of the genotoxicity tests, Pigment Red 63:3(Sr) is of similar low solubility in water and organic solvents as Pigment Red 57(Sr), and precipitation in the cell culture medium also occurred at concentrations as low as 19.9 μg/mL. In contrast to the test with Pigment Red 57(Sr), no significant reduction in growth rate was observed despite the precipitation and so the highest applied concentrations was 5000 μg/mL. The tested sample had an adequately high purity. No increase in polyploidy index was observed for the more soluble calcium salt analogue Pigment Red 57:1(Ca). The highest evaluable concentrations were chosen based on visual observation of precipitates which occurred at 250 μg/ml and above. No indication of clastogenicity or polyploidy were observed in either study. For both studies, commercial samples of known composition were tested. In one study, 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose in water was used as vehicle, whereas the other used DMSO. Whereas precipitation occurred at some point for all three pigment samples, concomitant cytotoxicity as indicated by inhibition of growth rate was only observed with the sample of Pigment Red 57(Sr). It is expected that any potential effect of strontium would be similar for Pigment Red 57(Sr) and 63:3(Sr). Therefore, the polyploidy increase is not considered to be related to Sr. As the organic part of Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) and 57(Sr) is identical, and Pigment Red 57:1(Ca) showed less precipitation, also no hazardous properties are attributed to the organic part. It is speculated that cytotoxicity and polyploidy are either related to differences in the crystal form, osmolality or to an unidentified impurity in the test sample. As the increase in polyploidy occurred irrespective of metabolic activation, it is more likely to be an artifact.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for genetic toxicity according to Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.