Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-425-6 | CAS number: 159034-91-0 1 - 6.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 June 2012 - 08 August 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Propylidynetrimethanol, ethoxylated, esters with acrylic acid, reaction products with diethylamine
- EC Number:
- 500-425-6
- EC Name:
- Propylidynetrimethanol, ethoxylated, esters with acrylic acid, reaction products with diethylamine
- Cas Number:
- 159034-91-0
- Molecular formula:
- Not available for this UVCB
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction product of poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), .alpha.-hydro-.omega.-[(1-oxo-2-propenyl)oxy]-, ether with 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol (3:1) and N-ethylethanamine
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: breeder: Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France
- Age at study initiation: approximately 8 weeks old on the day of treatment
- Mean body weight at study initiation: the males had a mean body weight of 348 g (range: 340 g to 365 g) and the females had a mean body weight of 244 g (range: 231 g to 254 g)
- Fasting period before study: yes, during the night before treatment
- Housing: the animals were housed by five from the same sex and group in polycarbonate cages with stainless steel lids
- Diet: SSNIFF R/M-H pelleted diet (free access)
- Water: tap water filtered with a 0.22 µm filter (free access)
- Acclimation period: the animals were acclimated to the study conditions for a period of 5 (females) or 8 (males) days before treatment.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2°C
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20%
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 12 cycles/hour of filtered, non-recycled air
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h.
IN-LIFE DATES: 26 June 2012 to 13 July 2012.
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 10% of body surface, dorsal site
- Type of wrap if used: hydrophilic gauze pad + adhesive hypoallergenic aerated semi-occlusive dressing + restraining bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Removal of dressing: 24h post-exposure
- Washing: at 24h post-exposure, with a moistened cotton pad
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 20 mL/kg
- Constant volume: no. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 animals per group.
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Clinical observations: frequently during the hours following treatment; then, at least once a day.
- Body weight: just before treatment on day 1; then on days 8 and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes (macroscopic). - Statistics:
- no
Results and discussion
Effect levels
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD0
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
- Mortality:
- No unscheduled deaths occurred during the study.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs indicative of systemic toxicity were observed in any animals. Very slight or well-defined erythema was observed at application sites of 3/5 males on days 2 and 3 and all females from day 2 until day 6 (3/5 females), on day 7 (1/5 female
- Gross pathology:
- No macroscopic test item-related findings were observed.
The macroscopic findings correlated with common histological findings in control rats, and thus were considered to be incidental. - Other findings:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The dermal LD0 of the test item was higher than 2000 mg/kg in rats.
- Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential toxicity of the test item following a single dermal application to rats.
This study wasperformed according to the international guidelines (OECD No. 402 and Council Regulation No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, Part B.3) andin compliance with the principles of Good Laboratory Practice.
Methods
The test item was applied in its original form to the skin of five female then five male Sprague-Dawley rats at the dose-level of 2000 mg/kg. The application site was covered by a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours.
Each animal was observed at least once a day for mortality and clinical signs for 15 days. From day 2, any local reactions at the treatment site were also noted. Body weight was recorded on day 1 and then on days 8 and 15.
On completion of the observation period, the animals were sacrificed and then submitted for a macroscopic post-mortem examination. Macroscopic lesions were preserved in buffered formal in then destroyed at the finalization of the study report as no microscopic examination was performed.
Results
No unscheduled deaths and no clinical signs indicative of systemic toxicity were observed in any animals.
Body weight was unaffected by the test item treatment.
Very slight or well-defined erythema was observed at application sites of males and females mostly on days 2 andsingle female presented with moderate to severe erythema on days 2 and 3 along with slight or moderate edema, and slight dryness from day 4 to day 7.
Scabs were noted at application site of 4/5 females and 2/5 males between days 3 and 13.
Very slight or slight dryness was also noted at application site of 2/5 males between days 4 and 8.
No macroscopic test item-related findings were observed.
Conclusion
The dermal LD50of the test item was higher than 2000 mg/kg in rats.
Therefore, the test item is not classified as toxic or harmful by dermal route according to the criteria of CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.