Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
The computational simulation was performed based on the read-across approach. The readacross is one of the so-called alternative test methods recommended by REACH, where the predictions are based on the experimental data available for the most similar compounds. The predictions were performed according to the Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF), which assumes six different risk assessment scenarios of chemical compounds.
Applied tool:
The OECD QSAR Toolbox, version 4.3
Procedure of analysis:
I. Profiling of the target substance in order to retrieve relevant information related to mechanism of action and observed or simulated metabolites
II. Category (source compounds) search based on selected criteria:
a. analogues are structurally similar to the target compound (similarity >20%)
b. analogues have the same structural features by the Toxic hazard classification by Cramer profiler.
III. Data collection for the analogues (OECD Toolbox database/ECHA CHEM).
IV. Toxicity prediction for the target substance
V. Category consistency check in order to assess the quality of the prediction
Applied scenario:
Scenario 2
Toxicity prediction for the target substance:
This read-across is based on the fact that the organism is not exposed to common compounds but rather, as a result of similarity, to chemicals which have similar (eco)toxicological and fate properties.
The target substance is an organometallic compound containing titanium (IV) centres, ascorbate (Asc) ligands. The metallic centres of the substance are linked by oxygen
coordination bonds of the Asc ligands.
The target and source chemicals are classified as High (Class III) according to the Toxic hazard classification by Cramer profiler. Also, analogues are structurally similar to the target compound in more than 20%. Five compounds that met these requirements were found. Two compounds were excluded initially, due to no given information regarding used OECD guideline. Three remaining analogues had specified (OECD 403 guideline). Taking into the consideration the ‘worst-case scenario’ approach, out of three analogues that met all the criteria, one value from one analogue (2-benzofuran-1,3-dione) was selected. The acute toxicity by inhalation for analogue was measured according to the OECD 403 and this value was taken into account for the prediction.
Table 6. Compounds that met the assumed requirements for acute toxicity by inhalation predictions
Chemicals Acute Toxicity by inhalation [mg/L] OECD guideline
D-Glucose CAS 9050-36-6 >5.16 No information
4-(Hydroxymethyl)-1,3-dioxolan-2-one
CAS 931-40-8 >5.6 OECD 403
2-benzofuran-1,3-dione
CAS 85-44-9 >2.14 OECD 403
Tin (II) oxalate
CAS 814-94-8 2 No information
1,2,4-Benzenetricarboxylic anhydride
CAS 552-30-7 >2.33 OECD 403
The acute inhalation toxicity for the source compound was performed according to:
Test guideline: OECD 403
Endpoint: LC50
Test organism: rat
The read-across prediction of the acute inhalation toxicity for the target substance was performed based on the “one to one” approach.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
In order to meet regulatory needs, reliability of the predicted results should be assessed. In case of classic quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) modelling, this idea can be realised by analysing, whether the predicted value is located within so-called applicability domain. The applicability domain is a theoretical region, defined by the range of toxicity values and structural descriptors for the training compounds, where the predictions may be considered as realistic ones. In a specific case of read-across, the assessment is performed based on the assessment of degree of similarity between the source and target compounds (in %). Moreover, the internal consistency of the group of source compounds (called „category” in OECD Toolbox nomenclature, independently which approach: analogue approach or category approach is used). The category consistency check could be based on the parameters describing the structural similarity and/or properties as well as mechanistic similarity of the tested compounds.
For example, all members of the category (analogues as well as target substance) need to have the same functional groups and endpoint specific alerts.
In the case of read-across-based prediction of the acute toxicity by inhalation of the titanyl (IV) diascorbate dihydrate, the read-across hypothesis considers that source and target compounds are classified as “High (Class III)” according to the Toxic hazard classification by Cramer profiler. Also, analogues are structurally similar to the target compound in more than 20%.
Besides, the category consistency, the boundaries of the applicability domain are verified by the critical value of log KOW. In case of titanyl (IV) diascorbate dihydrate, log KOW value is not available. What is more, in case of “one to one” approach, this criterion would be met only if source and target compounds are the same substance. Thus, information that “domain is not defined” is not critical in this situation.
The structural similarity between the source (2-benzofuran-1,3-dione) and the target compound (titanyl (IV) diascorbate dihydrate) equals to 20,5 %.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(5R)-5-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-one titanium
EC Number:
814-615-4
Cas Number:
122958-50-3
Molecular formula:
TiO(Asc)2 x2 H2O
IUPAC Name:
(5R)-5-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-one titanium

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
2.14 mg/L air

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The acute inhalation toxicity for the target substance is predicted at level LC50 = 2.14 mg/L air.
Executive summary:

The source and target compounds are classified as “High (Class III)” according to the Toxic hazard classification by Cramer profiler. Also, analogues are structurally similar to the target compound in more than 20%. The toxicity prediction was performed based on the experimental data included in the OECD QSAR Toolbox. Five chemicals met the assumed requirements, but due to availability of experimental data related to the acute toxicity by inhalation and the worstcase scenario, 2-benzofuran-1,3-dione was chosen as the source compound.