Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
3 Mar - 26 Apr 1967
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well documented study report which meets basic scienific principles.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: monthly report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1967
Report date:
1967
Reference Type:
other: monthly report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1967
Report date:
1967

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The test substance was applied to the skin of 105 human volunteers under occlusive patches. For induction, the initial patches remained on the skin for 72 h whereas the challenge patches were removed after 48 h. Volunteers that showed a primary irritation after induction were further exposed to the test item under semi-occlusive patches. Beside the test substance, 5 additional chemicals were tested simultaneously on the same volunteers.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Oleic acid, monoester with glycerol
EC Number:
247-038-6
EC Name:
Oleic acid, monoester with glycerol
Cas Number:
25496-72-4
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl)ethyl octadec-9-enoate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Analytical purity: no data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 87.5% [trade name], 6.5% Tween 20, 6.0% H2O
- Lot/batch No.: 5850

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
not specified
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 203
- Sex: 120 males, 83 females
- Age: 5 - 65
- Demographic information: white and coloured volunteers (females: 1 white and 5 coloured, males: 95 white and 4 coloured; not further specified)
Controls:
not required, untreated sites of the same volunteers served as control
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: occlusive and semiocclusive (for further details see "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables")
- Description of patch:
occlusive patch: closed vinyl plastic patch ("Tech Tabs")
semi-occlusive patch: gauze patch held in place with adhesive tape (secured only above and below the gauze patch)
- Vehicle / solvent: none
- Concentrations: 100%

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions:
Induction: 26 out of 203 volunteers
Challenge: 17 out of 203 volunteers
- Number of subjects with negative reactions:
Induction: 177
Challenge: 186
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions:
Induction: 6
Challenge: 8
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions:
Induction: 20
Challenge: 9

OTHER RESULTS:
NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS AFTER SEMI-OCCLUSIVE PATCH
- Number of subjects with positive reactions:
After induction: 3 out of 21 volunteers
After challenge: 4 out of 26 volunteers
- Number of subjects with negative reactions:
After induction: 18
After challenge: 22
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions:
After induction: not further specified
After challenge: 4
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions:
After induction: not further specified
After challenge: 0

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Skin reactions

Volunteer

Induction (occlusive)

Challenge (occlusive)

1

±

0

2

±

0

3

±

±

4

±

±

5

±

1+

6

±

1+

7

1+

0

8

1+

0

9

1+

0

10

1+

0

11

1+

0

12

1+

0

13

1+

0

14

1+

0

15

1+

0

16

1+

0

17

1+

±

18

1+

±

19

1+

1+

20

1+

2+

21

1+

3+

22

2+

±

23

2+

1+

24

2+

1+

25

2+

2+

26

3+

±

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test item induced a positive skin reaction after the induction period under occlusive patches in 26 volunteers with 14 of those showing a positive skin reaction after the challenge thereby suggesting the induction of a sensitisation reaction. However, when volunteers were re-exposed to the test item under semi-occlusive patches, only 3 or 4 volunteers showed a positive skin reaction after the first or second re-exposure, respectively. Thus, the type of application seems to have a strong impact on the skin reaction. Additionally, considering the fact that the test item induced only equivocal effects after re-exposure under semi-occlusive patches, the skin reactions seem to be related to mild skin irritation instead of sensitisation.