Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 460-490-0 | CAS number: 477218-42-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 07-08-2017 to 16-10-2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 305 (Bioaccumulation in Fish: Aqueous and Dietary Exposure) -I: Aqueous Exposure Bioconcentration Fish Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: JAPAN: Method for Testing the Degree of Accumulation of Chemical Substances in Fish Body
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms: Days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the exposure period
- Sampling intervals/frequency for test medium samples: Days 0 (before fish were introduced), 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: On autosampler
- Details on sampling and analysis of test organisms and test media samples (e.g. sample preparation, analytical methods):
Test water analysis: The test water from each concentration level will be sampled on days 0 (before introduction of the fish), 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the exposure period, and analysed for the test substance. This is done for the test water 100 mL for high concentration level, 1000 mL for low concentration level, passage through an Empore disk C18 47 mm with aspiration. Passed with approx. 5 mL of acetone and approx. 10 mL of ultrapure water beforehand for conditioning). The elute with acetone ca. 4.8 mL x 2, dilute to 10 mL with acetone is then subject to GC-MS analysis.
Test organism analysis: Four fish will be sampled from each concentration level on days 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of the exposure period, and analysed for the test substance two by two using the method described (in the full study report), terminal procedures. The fish remaining from analysis at the end of the exposure period and back-up samples will be stored in a freezer for three months, and may be discarded after that period, unless additional analysis is necessary.
Lipid content: At the start and end of the exposure period, lipid contents of the fish is measured. Five fish are sampled from the acclimation aquarium at the start of the exposure period, and three fish each are sampled from the test aquariums at the end of the exposure period. In these samples, lipid contents of three fish are sampled from the acclimation aquarium and the control aquarium are measured individually according to the procedure described (in the full study report). The two fish remaining from analysis that are sampled upon initiation of exposure and three fish each sampled from each concentration level upon completion of exposure may be used as back-up samples. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v)
- Details on preparation of test solutions, spiked fish food or sediment:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Feed solution and the dilution water are delivered to a mixing glass tube through individual metering pumps with a certain flow rate each, and then supplied continuously to respective test aquariums.
- Controls: Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v) without test item
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v).
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium (stock solution and final test solution(s) at different concentrations and in control(s)): see above.
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): None reported.
PREPARATION OF SPIKED FISH FOOD
- Details on fish food (source, fat content as supplied, etc): feed documented in the full study report.
- Details of spiking (e.g. i) liquid test material (neat); ii) with a vehicle (corn or fish oil); or iii) using an organic solvent: Not applicable.
- Quantity of corn or fish oil vehicle, if used, per unit mass of fish food: Not applicable.
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent), if used: Not applicable.
- Method of mixing: Not applicable.
- Equilibration time: Not applicable.
- Method for removal of solvent, if used: Not applicable. - Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus carpio
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Common carp (Cyprinus carpio)
- Strain: Not reported.
- Source: Recognised supplier (documented in the full study report)
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): Yearlings
- Length at study initiation (length definition, mean, range and SD): at the beginning of uptake phase 8 +/- 4 cm
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): at the beginning of uptake phase ca. 8 g
- Weight at termination (mean and range, SD): Not reported.
- Method of breeding: Not reported.
- Lipid content at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 3.7% (n=3, 2.4 to 4.4%) at the start of the exposure period
- Health status: Healthy.
- Description of housing/holding area: Indicated in the full study report.
- Feeding during test
- Food type: Recognised supplier feed
- Amount: amount corresponding to 1.5% of total body weight was fed once daily
- Frequency: amount corresponding to 1.5% of total body weight was fed once daily
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: > 14 days
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): Yes.
- Type and amount of food: Recognised supplier feed ; amount corresponding to 1.5% of total body weight was fed once daily
- Feeding frequency: amount corresponding to 1.5% of total body weight was fed once daily
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): < 5% during acclimatisation. - Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Justification for method:
- aqueous exposure method used for following reason: International regulatory requirements
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 28 d
- Hardness:
- 53 - 56 mgCaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 24.0-24.3°C
- pH:
- pH 7.0
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.1-8.8 mgO2/L
- TOC:
- 15.1-24.5 mgC/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 56 L glass tank
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass, 56 L; 50 L fill volume
- Aeration: Yes.
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Not reported.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): Continuous flow-through dilution system (800 L/day) ; turnover 16 times per day.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 28 per concentration ; 12 in control
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): One.
- No. of vessels per control / vehicle control (replicates): see above.
- Biomass loading rate: > 1 L/day/g
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: water from the premises of test laboratory (regularly tested per annum) ; most recent analysis appended to the full study report.
- Holding medium different from test medium: No.
- Intervals of water quality measurement: See above.
- Intervals of test medium replacement: Flow through method.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: No.
- Photoperiod: 16 hours light / 8 hours dark
- Light intensity: Not reported ; artificial white fluorescent lamp (400 – 700 nm))
RANGE-FINDING / PRELIMINARY STUDY
- Test concentrations: Not applicable.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Not applicable.
- Other justification for choice of test concentrations: Nominal concentrations of test item: Based on the physico-chemical properties of the substance and/or preceding ecotoxicology testing. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Level 1: Nominal: 0.01 mg/L / Measured: 0.00748 mg/L (average of 28 days)
Level 2: Nominal: 0.001 mg/L / Measured: 0.000701 mg/L (average of 28 days)
Control: 0 mg/L - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Lipid content:
- 3.7 %
- Time point:
- start of exposure
- Remarks on result:
- other: n=3 ; 2.4 to 4.4%
- Lipid content:
- 3.4 %
- Time point:
- end of exposure
- Remarks on result:
- other: n= 3 ; 3.0 to 3.7%
- Lipid content:
- 3.55 %
- Time point:
- other: mean
- Remarks on result:
- other: start and end of exposure
- Conc. / dose:
- 0.01 mg/L
- Temp.:
- >= 24 - <= 24.3 °C
- pH:
- 7
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- <= 14 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Time of plateau:
- 7 d
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks:
- the variation was within ± 20% of the mean value in the steady-state confirmation period (Days 7-28). Indicating a steady state had been reached.
- Conc. / dose:
- 0.001 mg/g food
- Temp.:
- >= 24 - <= 24.3 °C
- pH:
- 7
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- <= 73 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Time of plateau:
- 7 d
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks:
- the variation was within ± 20% of the mean value in the steady-state confirmation period (Days 7-28). Indicating a steady state had been reached.
- Metabolites:
- None reported.
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of test organisms: None reported.
- Behavioural abnormalities: None reported.
- Observations on feeding behaviour: None reported.
- Observations on body length and weight: None reported.
- Reproduction during test period: None reported.
- Other biological observations: None reported.
- Organ specific bioaccumulation: None reported.
- Bound residues forming a plateau: Not reported.
- Mortality and/or behavioural abnormalities of control: None.
- Loss of test substance during test period: Level 1: Nominal: 0.01 mg/L / Measured: 0.00748 mg/L (average of 28 days). Level 2: Nominal: 0.001 mg/L / Measured: 0.000701 mg/L (average of 28 days). Differences of nominal to measured were not indicated.
- Non-eliminated residues (NER) at the end of elimination phase: Not reported.
- Results with vehicle control: No interfering peak was observed at the peak positions of the test item in the GC-MS chromatogram for the Control fish at the end of the uptake phase. - Reported statistics:
- The calibration curve correlation coefficient was calculated using least squares methodology according to:
JIS Handbook "General rules for chemical analysis". · JIS K0050, General rules for chemical analysis
Calculations of Mean Concentration in Test Water and BCF was conducted according to:
JIS Handbook "Guide to the handling of numbers"
JIS Z9041-1: 1999, Statistical interpretation of data - Part I :Statistical presentation of data
JIS Z8401-1:1999, Guide to the rounding of numbers - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The test item steady state bioaccumulation concentration factor (BCF) at two concentration levels was determined to be: Nominal: 0.01 mg/L: BCF < or = 14 L/Kg and Nominal: 0.001 mg/L: BCF = or < 73 L/Kg whole body wet weight. Under the conditions of this study, the BCF was 14 to 73 L/Kg. Based on a mean lipid content at start and end of exposure (3.55%), the BCF (lipid-normalised 5%) is < or = 103 L/Kg whole body wet weight.
- Executive summary:
The bioconcentration factor of the test item to common carp (Cyprinus carpio) was determined in a 28-day test according to OECD Guideline 305 (Bioaccumulation in Fish: Aqueous and Dietary Exposure) - I: Aqueous Exposure Bioconcentration Fish Test and JAPAN: Method for Testing the Degree of Accumulation of Chemical Substances in Fish Body under GLP. Groups of test organisms were exposed to the test item in a flow-through test system for 28-days. Test item was prepared from stock solutions in Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v). Exposures were at nominal concentrations Nominal: 0.01 mg/L and Nominal: 0.001 mg/. The corresponding measured concentrations were 0.00748 mg/L and 0.000701 mg/L averaged over 28-days. A control group was also utilised exposed to Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v) only. The test item in test water and test organisms was analysed by GC-MS. The total lipid content of fish before the uptake phase was mean 3.4% to 3.7%. At both concentration levels, the steady-state was considered to have been reached within the 28-day exposure period since all values were less than 100 L/kg (wet wt.) (observed < or = 14 L/kg (wet wt.) and< 73 L/kg (wet wt.) at the high- and low-exposure concentrations, respectively). In view of these results, it was not necessary to conduct a depuration phase. All validity criteria were considered to have been met. The test item steady state bioaccumulation concentration factor (BCF) at two concentration levels was determined to be: Nominal: 0.01 mg/L: BCF < or = 14 L/Kg and Nominal: 0.001 mg/L: BCF = or < 73 L/Kg whole body wet weight. Under the conditions of this study, the BCF was 14 to 73 L/Kg. Based on the mean lipid content (start and end of exposure period): 3.55%, the applicant recalculates the reported value for 5% lipid content as BCF (lipid-normalised 5%) is < or = 103 L/Kg whole body wet weight.
Reference
Applicant recalculation of the reported BCF (steady state) accounting for normalisation to Lipid content of 5% in accordance with OECD TG 305: paragraph 75 and Annex 5 and ECHA R7.b (2017) :
Mean lipid content (start and end of exposure period): 3.55%
Worst case BCF (steady state) measured = 73 L/Kg whole body wt. weight
BCF (lipid-normalised 5%) = [0.05 / 0.0355] x 73 L/Kg whole body wt. weight
BCF (lipid-normalised 5%) = 103 L/Kg whole body wet weight.
References:
1. OECD TG 305 (2012) : Annex 5
Description of key information
1. BCF (fish: steady state) : 14 – 73 L/Kg whole body w.w., steady state within 28-days, OECD TG 305, 2018
The corresponding BCF (fish: steady state : lipid normalised 5%) = 103 L/Kg whole body w.w. based on 73 L/Kg whole body w.w. starting value.
2. BCF (fish: in vitro – in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE)) : 650 L/kg ww Fucalc and 271 L/kg ww Fu=1.0, predicted BCF including in vitro biotransformation using Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Liver S9 Fraction, eq. or similar to OECD TG 319B, 2019
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- BCF (aquatic species):
- 103 L/kg ww
Additional information
Key study : OECD 305, 2018 : The bioconcentration factor of the test item to common carp (Cyprinus carpio) was determined in a 28-day test according to OECD Guideline 305 (Bioaccumulation in Fish: Aqueous and Dietary Exposure) - I: Aqueous Exposure Bioconcentration Fish Test and JAPAN: Method for Testing the Degree of Accumulation of Chemical Substances in Fish Body under GLP. Groups of test organisms were exposed to the test item in a flow-through test system for 28-days. Test item was prepared from stock solutions in Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v). Exposures were at nominal concentrations Nominal: 0.01 mg/L and Nominal: 0.001 mg/. The corresponding measured concentrations were 0.00748 mg/L and 0.000701 mg/L averaged over 28-days. A control group was also utilised exposed to Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 ppm (v/v) only. The test item in test water and test organisms was analysed by GC-MS. The total lipid content of fish before the uptake phase was mean 3.4% to 3.7%. At both concentration levels, the steady-state was considered to have been reached within the 28-day exposure period since all values were less than 100 L/kg (wet wt.) (observed < or = 14 L/kg (wet wt.) and< 73 L/kg (wet wt.) at the high- and low-exposure concentrations, respectively). In view of these results, it was not necessary to conduct a depuration phase. All validity criteria were considered to have been met. The test item steady state bioaccumulation concentration factor (BCF) at two concentration levels was determined to be: Nominal: 0.01 mg/L: BCF < or = 14 L/Kg and Nominal: 0.001 mg/L: BCF = or < 73 L/Kg whole body wet weight. Under the conditions of this study, the BCF was 14 to 73 L/Kg. Based on the mean lipid content (start and end of exposure period): 3.55%, the applicant recalculates the reported value for 5% lipid content as BCF (lipid-normalised 5%) is < or = 103 L/Kg whole body wet weight.
Key study : equivalent or similar to OECD TG 319B, 2019 : A study was performed to assess the in vitro stability of test item in fish liver S9 fractions using a method equivalent or similar to OECD TG 319B. The method followed was a standardised assay, previously prevalidated by a consortium under the coordination of HESI/ILSI and under corresponding peer reviewed methodology. The method was recently internationally validated and OECD accepted. Full details of the in vitro assay methodology are provided in the full study report and are presented by the applicant. Very rapid enzymatic turnover of the major constituent of test item by trout liver S9 fractions was observed. Biotransformation was independent on the addition of cofactors indicating the involvement of a carboxylesterase. The equivalent alcohol and cyclopropanecarboxylic acid were identified as metabolites, which are potential degradation products of an esterase catalysed cleavage. Substrate depletion assays using RT-S9 are considered to be a reliable and adequate method to assess biotransformation of chemicals in fish. As per the published literature. Predicted BCFs based on in vitro biotransformation rates in RT-S9 showed a better agreement to in vivo measured BCFs for chemicals compared to the in silico predictions based on solely log Kow (H. Laue et al, 2014 : Predicting the bioconcentration of fragrance ingredients by rainbow trout using measured rates of in vitro intrinsic clearance. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014. 48(16): p. 9486-9495). The biotransformation rate determined for test item in fish liver S9 fractions in the main experiment (8.42/h) was used as input into an in vitro - in vivo extrapolation model to predict the BCF using the measured log Kow (5.6 , cited measured value). The partitioning based BCF assuming no metabolism for test item based on the measured log Kow value was calculated as part of the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation model (BCF 13344 L/Kg). Including the in vitro biotransformation rate of test item in trout S9 fractions and other parameters (cited in the full study report), the predicted BCFs were 650 L/kg wet weight assuming different binding to serum in vivo vs. in vitro (Fu calc) and 271 L/kg wet weight setting Fu = 1.0. These predicted BCFs based on in vitro biotransformation rates are significantly lower compared to the BCF value calculated with an assumed turnover rate of 0. Especially for chemicals with higher log Kow values, a better correlation of predicted BCFs calculated with the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation model using an assumed Fu of 1.0 and measured in vivo BCFs was shown in several studies (cited) than when Fu calc is used. One possible explanation may be that the assumption of the extrapolation model that only freely dissolved chemicals are available for metabolic turnover is incorrect. Chemicals bound to proteins may desorb rapidly and thus contribute to the metabolic turnover of the chemicals. In an available in vivo Fish BCF study (2018) with common carp (Cyprinus carpio), according to or equivalent to OECD TG 305 on the test item, the lipid normalised (5%) steady state BCF of test item was determined to be ≤ 103 L/kg (wet wt.) for the low test concentration and ≤ 20 L/kg (wet wt.) for the high test concentration. The predicted BCFs based on the RT-S9 biotransformation rates using a theoretically calculated Fu were 6.3-fold higher and 2.6-fold higher using an assumed Fu of 1.0 than the highest in vivo BCF value (≤ 103 L/kg). A similar trend of overprediction of BCFs based on in vitro biotransformation and IVIVE especially for Fu calculated was also observed previously in several peer reviewed studies (cited by the report author). Biotransformation rates determined following OECD TG 319B may be utilised as an important tool in an ITS (Intelligent Testing Strategy) tiered testing regime to determine the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.