Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-854-2 | CAS number: 2551-62-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 6 074 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 60 737 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required, starting point is NOAEC.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is not necessary for the inhalation route. Extrapolation is based on toxicological equivalence of a concentration of a chemical in the air of experimental animals and humans; animals and humans breathe at a rate depending on their caloric requirements.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional interspecies factor is applied as:
- regarding toxicokinetics: no metabolic differences between rats and humans are expected for SF6 based on the substance chemical inertness and rapid excretion in unmetabolised form;
- regarding toxicodynamics: no effects were observed up to the relatively very high concentration of 120870 mg/m3. In addition, no differences are expected based on the chemical inertness of SF6. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for workers.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Database of appropriate quality
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainty identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
According to the REACH “Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment”, a leading DN(M)EL needs to be derived for every relevant human population and every relevant route, duration and frequency of exposure, if feasible. As sulphur hexafluoride is a gas, oral and dermal routes of exposure are considered to be irrelevant, therefore no DNELs were derived for these routes.
As the substance is not classified for acute toxicity, according to the REACH “Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment” (R.8.4.3.1), no acute / short-term exposure DNELs need to be derived.
For long-term exposure, data from a 90-day repeated dose toxicity study by the inhalation route is available. In this study, no adverse effects were observed in rats at the highest concentration tested (NOAEC of 120870 mg/m3, corresponding to a target limit concentration of 20000 ppm). This value will be used to derive a DNEL for long-term exposure. The substance is not genotoxic, not carcinogenic, and is not a reproductive or developmental toxicant. Therefore, no DNELs will be derived for these endpoints, i.e., the long-term DNEL is also considered sufficient to protect against these effects.
The DNEL for long-term exposure - local/systemic effects for workers is derived as follows:
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEC: 120870 mg/m3 |
The highest concentration in the subchronic toxicity study with rats; no adverse effects were observed. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
6/8
6.7 m3/10 m3 |
Correction of exposure duration in study (6 hrs/day, 5 days/week) to default worker exposure (8 hrs/day, 5 days/week);
Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest (6.7 m3/10 m3). |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No additional interspecies factor is applied as: - regarding toxicokinetics: no metabolic differences between rats and humans are expected for SF6 based on the substance chemical inertness and rapid excretion in unmetabolised form; - regarding toxicodynamics: no effects were observed up to the relatively very high concentration of 120870 mg/m3. In addition, no differences are expected based on the chemical inertness of SF6. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Subchronic to chronic |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
For workers |
120870 x 6/8 x 6.7/10 / (1 x 5 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 6074 mg/m3 (1008 ppm) |
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1 511 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 30 218 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Not required, starting point is NOAEC.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is not necessary for the inhalation route. Extrapolation is based on toxicological equivalence of a concentration of a chemical in the air of experimental animals and humans; animals and humans breathe at a rate depending on their caloric requirements.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- No additional interspecies factor is applied as:
- regarding toxicokinetics: no metabolic differences between rats and humans are expected for SF6 based on the substance chemical inertness and rapid excretion in unmetabolised form;
- regarding toxicodynamics: no effects were observed up to the relatively very high concentration of 120870 mg/m3. In addition, no differences are expected based on the chemical inertness of SF6. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for general population.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Database of appropriate quality,
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainty identified.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
The DNEL for long-term exposure - systemic effects for the general population is derived as follows:
Description | Value | Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor | NOAEC: 120870 mg/m3 | The highest concentration in the subacute toxicity study with rats; no adverse effects were observed |
Step 2) Modification of starting point | 6/24
| Correction of exposure duration in study (6 hrs/day, 5 days/week) to default general population exposure (24 hrs/day) [1] |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies | 1 | No additional interspecies factor is applied as: - regarding toxicokinetics: no metabolic differences between rats and humans are expected for SF6 based on the substance chemical inertness and rapid excretion in unmetabolised form; - regarding toxicodynamics: no effects were observed up to the relatively very high concentration of 120870 mg/m3. In addition, no differences are expected based on the chemical inertness of SF6. |
Intraspecies | 10 | Default assessment factor for general population |
Exposure duration | 2 | Subchronic to chronic |
Dose response | 1 |
|
Quality of database | 1 |
|
DNEL | Value | |
For the general population | 120870 x 6/24 / (1 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 1511 mg/m3 (250 ppm) |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.