Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-066-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- Internationally accepted method, EPI Suite, EPA (USA)
- Justification for type of information:
- See attached the QMRF and QPRF for the QSAR model
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Meylan, W.M., Howard, P.H, Aronson, D., Printup, H. and S. Gouchie. 1997. "Improved Method for Estimating Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) from Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient", SRC TR-97-006 (2nd Update), July 22, 1997; prepared for: Robert S. Boethling, EPA-OPPT, Washington, DC; Contract No. 68-D5-0012; prepared by: ; Syracuse Research Corp., Environmental Science Center, 6225 Running Ridge Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212.
Meylan, W.M., Howard, P.H., Boethling, R.S. et al. 1999. Improved Method for Estimating Bioconcentration / Bioaccumulation Factor from Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18(4): 664-672 (1999). - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: N(H)(H)(H)(H)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
- Key result
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 70.79 L/kg
- Remarks on result:
- other: (Log BCF from regression-based method = 1.85; log Kow used: 5.07)
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- The BCF of ammonium stearate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
- Executive summary:
Using the BCFBAF v3.01 model of EPI Suite v4.11, the BCF of ammonium stearate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- Internationally accepted method, EPI Suite, EPA (USA)
- Justification for type of information:
- See attached the QMRF and QPRF for the QSAR model.
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Meylan, W.M., Howard, P.H, Aronson, D., Printup, H. and S. Gouchie. 1997. "Improved Method for Estimating Bioconcentration Factor (BCF) from Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient", SRC TR-97-006 (2nd Update), July 22, 1997; prepared for: Robert S. Boethling, EPA-OPPT, Washington, DC; Contract No. 68-D5-0012; prepared by: ; Syracuse Research Corp., Environmental Science Center, 6225 Running Ridge Road, North Syracuse, NY 13212.
Meylan, W.M., Howard, P.H., Boethling, R.S. et al. 1999. Improved Method for Estimating Bioconcentration / Bioaccumulation Factor from Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18(4): 664-672 (1999). - Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SMILES: N(H)(H)(H)(H)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
- Key result
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 70.79 L/kg
- Remarks on result:
- other: (Log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850. log Kow used: 4.09)
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not applicable
- Conclusions:
- The BCF of ammonium palmitate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
- Executive summary:
Using the BCFBAF v3.01 model of EPI Suite v4.11, the BCF of ammonium palmitate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 305 (Bioconcentration: Flow-through Fish Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (depuration phase was not determined; fish were only sampled at the end of exposure)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms:
Sampling of tissue was perfomed at the termination of exposure in surviving fish, which was after 28 days in the low exposure concentrations and 16 days in top two exposure concentrations. Also after 4 to 8 days in dead fish at the higher exposure concentrations sampling was conducted.
Total radioactivity in fish surviving to the end of the test (0, 2, 3.6, and 6.4 mg/L) or to day 16 (11.2 and 20 mg/L) was determined in about five fish at each concentration by dissolving the tissue in Soluene-350 tissue solubilizer (Packard).
Lauric acid was extracted from whole fish by matrix solidphase dispersion extraction and extraction efficiency was determined by extraction from
spiked fish tissue (unexposed fish, 0.3–0.6 g wet weight). Fractions were analyzed by GC–mass spectrometry (MS) on a Fisons Instruments MD800 bench-top GC–MS. Additionally, radioactivity recovered in each fraction was determined for some samples.
- Sampling intervals/frequency for test medium samples:
Concentrations of laurate in all the test media were determined frequently throughout the test (n=21; one sample per test concentration on each sampling occasion) using LSC. A limited number of samples (three to six per concentration) were also centrifuged to estimate crudely the water-soluble fraction. Lauric acid was extracted (n=16, one sample from each concentration with surviving fish on four occasions) from the water samples to determine if biodegradation products significantly contributed to total radioactivity. Samples were analyzed by GC–FID using a Perkin Elmer GC 8700 chromatograph.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: At test termination (day 28), fish were anesthesied, frozen and stored at - 20 °C for one week until tissues were analyzed. - Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation of test solutions, spiked fish food or sediment:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Stocks of sodium laurate were prepared daily by warming (above the Kraft point of 35–40ºC) equimolar quantities of sodium hydroxide and lauric acid in distilled water in a water bath to keep the soap in solution (stock solutions of 5.7, 3.2, 1.82, 1.03, and 0.57 g/L). Radiolabeled lauric acid in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each stock (final concentration, 0.5 ml DMSO/L) to give specific activities of 0.57, 1.02, 1.79, 3.16, and 5.71 mCi/g, respectively. The concentrations of sodium laurate were measured in the stocks on six occasions during the experiment (n=25; concentrations 99 ± 2% of nominal) by liquid scintillation counting (LSC).
- Controls: Yes, carbon-filtered tap water containing the same amount of DMSO of the stock solutions.
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) - Test organisms (species):
- Danio rerio (previous name: Brachydanio rerio)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: zebrafish
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): approx. 2 months old
- Weight at study initiation (mean and range, SD): 68.9 mg ± 9.8 mg
- Weight at termination (mean and range, SD): 111.3±7.8 mg
- Feeding during test: Yes. Feeding levels were adjusted for mortalities that occurred during the test. Fish were not fed on day 13 and were reweighted on day 14 to recalculate the food ratio. Moreover, fish were not fed on day 27 and reweight on day 28 (test termination).
Before feeding, surface scum (precipitated calcium laurate) was removed to minimize uptake of laurate via dietary sources.
- Food type: Fish food (Tetramin) and Artemia (each one daily)
- Amount: 2% of wet weight during the week, 4% of wet weight in weekends
- Frequency: During the week: fish food (Tetramint) and Artemia, each one daily. During the weekend: Fish food (Tetramint) once. - Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Test type:
- flow-through
- Water / sediment media type:
- natural water: freshwater
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 28 d
- Hardness:
- 96.5 ± 4.5 mg/L CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 21.4 ± 0.5 ºC
- pH:
- 7.6 ± 0.2
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8 ± 0.7 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 5 Liter
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Aeration: flow -though
- Type of flow-through: proportional diluter
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): 170 -180 mL/min.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 16
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per control / vehicle control (replicates): 1
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: tap water
- Holding medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: yes
- Intervals of test medium replacement: every 28 min.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 h light/8 h dark
RANGE-FINDING / PRELIMINARY STUDY
- Test concentrations: no details
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The concentration range was selected after a review of the published acute toxicity values to fish for sodium laurate (11 and 63 mg/L [1]; .27 mg/L, Unilever Research, unpublished results). - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0, 2.0, 3.6, 6.4, 11.2 and 20.0 mg/L
Measured concentrations: 0, 2.2, 3.7, 6.6, 12.9 and 20.1 mg/L - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- Bioconcentration derived from the body burdens and average test media concentrations.
- Key result
- Conc. / dose:
- 2 mg/L
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 242 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks on result:
- other: (BCF mean value of 243, 234 and 249 L/kg)
- Key result
- Conc. / dose:
- 3.6 mg/L
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 263 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks on result:
- other: (BCF mean value of 282, 270 and 236 L/kg)
- Key result
- Conc. / dose:
- 6.4 mg/L
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 263 L/kg
- Basis:
- whole body w.w.
- Calculation basis:
- steady state
- Remarks on result:
- other: (BCF mean value of 238 and 288 L/kg)
- Metabolites:
- Analysis of fish tissue indicated that laurate was extensively metabolized. Metabolites were more hydrophobic than the parent material, which could have been incorporated into larger lipids.
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of test organisms: Exposure to sodium laurate caused mortalities at total concentrations of 3.6 (6%), 6.4 (14%), 11 (75%), and 20 mg/L (75%).
- Observations on body length and weight: Differences existed between the mean weights at day 0 (p 5 0.03, ANOVA), which prevented comparison of the mean weights of control fish with exposed fish after 14 and 28 d. Growth rates were higher in laurate-exposed fish than in control animals, although only at 3.6 mg/L (days 0–14) and at 2 and 3.6 mg/L (days 0–28) were these significantly different (p , 0.05). Between days 14 and 28, no significant differences existed in growth rate of control and exposed fish.
- Bioconcentration:
Increasing exposure concentrations of laurate led to increasing concentrations of lauric acid in fish tissue. After 28 d, fish exposed to 2, 3.6, and 6.4 mg/L laurate had accumulated 535, 970, and 1,735 mg/kg lauric acid (wet weight). This equates to 2.7, 4.8, and 8.7 mmol/kg.
The mean 28-d bioconcentration factor (BCF) was 255 L/kg with an SD of 22 based on intact lauric acid. Growth dilution is unlikely to have affected the BCF given the relatively slow growth rate over the 28-d study period and the rapid time for lauric acid to reach a steady state concentration.
Extraction of fish tissue with various solvents clearly showed that the radioactivity recovered from fish was not associated with intact lauric acid. In fish that died shortly after the start of the test, the bulk of the intact lauric acid eluted in the toluene fraction, but the majority of the radioactivity was found in the hexane and toluene fractions. In survivors at the end of the exposure period, a much larger proportion of the radioactivity (>70%) eluted in the hexane fraction. These findings indicate that lauric acid was rapidly metabolized to more hydrophobic molecules, especially in fish
that survived to day 28.
- Other results: Recovery of laurate concentration in media: 100 to 115% of nominal concentrations. At concentrations of 2, 3.6, and 6.4 mg/L, there was little difference between total and soluble laurate, but approximate 8.6 mg/L and 8.0 mg/L of soluble laurate were measured in the 11.2 and 20 mg/L test media, corresponding to 80 and 40% of the total laurate, respectively. Therefore, an approximate solubility limit for laurate in the test medium was 8 to 9 mg/L. During the test, precipitates were visible, particularly at the higher concentrations (11.2 and 20.0 mg/L). - Reported statistics:
- Mean weights and pseudospecific growth rates were compared using nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA) followed by Dunn’s test (two-tailed test, comparison against a control group), as a test for normality (Shapiro-Wilk) indicated some of the data were not normally distributed. The pseudospecific growth rate expresses the individual growth rate compared to the mean initial weight of the tank population. Statistical tests were carried out using Unistat (version 4). Toxicity data were analyzed by nonlinear interpolation or, if the data allowed, by the probit method.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (temperature variation <±2ºC, dissolved oxygen did not fall bellow 60% of saturation, concentration of test item manteined within 20%, no adverse effects on control fish)
- Conclusions:
- The bioconcentration factor of sodium laurate was estimated to be 255 L/kg.
- Executive summary:
Bioaccumulation to zebrafish (Danio rerio) of sodium laurate was analyzed in a 28 day growth rate study. Groups of 16 juvenile fish (~2 months old) were exposed to the test item concentration of 0 (control), 2.0, 3.6, 6.4, 11.2 and 20 mg/L for 28 days under flow-through conditions (1 replicate). At test termination (day 28), fish were anesthesied, frozen and stored at - 20 °C for one week until tissues were analyzed. Bioconcentration derived from the body burdens and average test media concentrations in the tissues (lauric acid). Laurate was extensively biotransformed to metabolites, including less polar compounds, possibly triacylglycerols. At the end of the exposure period, which was considered long enough for steady state to be achieved, the bioconcentration factor of laurate was estimated to be 255 L/kg.
Referenceopen allclose all
The BCF of ammonium stearate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
The BCF of ammonium palmitate was 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850).
Extraction of lauric acid from fish tissue:
Nominal laurate concn. (mg/L) |
No.fish |
Tissue weight1 (mg) |
Hexane extract (µg) |
Toluene extract (µg) |
Ethyl acetate extract (µg) |
Methanol extract (µg) |
Total lauric acid (µg) |
Lauric acid in fish (mg/kg)1 |
Intact lauric acid2 (%14C) |
Duration of exposure (days) |
0 |
6 |
557 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
1.9 |
0.1 |
2.9 |
5 |
- |
28 |
5 |
480 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
3.1 |
0.3 |
4.2 |
9 |
- |
28 |
|
2.0 |
3 |
405 |
14.8 |
164 |
38.6 |
0.2 |
218 |
538 |
3.0 |
28 |
4 |
489 |
17.3 |
174 |
61.5 |
0.3 |
253 |
517 |
- |
28 |
|
4 |
471 |
15.5 |
190 |
53.3 |
0.3 |
259 |
551 |
3.7 |
28 |
|
3.6 |
3 |
382 |
21.3 |
289 |
86.7 |
0.2 |
397 |
1040 |
3.4 |
28 |
3 |
417 |
30.2 |
288 |
97.0 |
0.3 |
416 |
996 |
3.9 |
28 |
|
4 |
458 |
26.7 |
291 |
80.0 |
0.7 |
399 |
871 |
- |
28 |
|
6.4 |
3 |
391 |
42.7 |
493 |
78.0 |
0.4 |
614 |
1570 |
3.1 |
28 |
3 |
336 |
39.9 |
505 |
91.8 |
0.7 |
638 |
1900 |
4.3 |
28 |
|
11.23 |
6 |
486 |
24.3 |
264 |
71.8 |
7.0 |
367 |
754 |
6.8 |
4 - 6 |
20.03 |
5 |
396 |
9.1 |
151 |
23.4 |
6.3 |
198 |
500 |
6.5 |
4 - 5 |
7 |
577 |
33.7 |
521 |
188 |
14.8 |
749 |
1300 |
15.1 |
5 - 8 |
1) wet weight
2) percentage of measured intact lauric acid of total14C in tissues at the end of exposure
3) nonmetabolised lauric acid measured in fish died 5 to 8 days after the start of the exposure.
After 28 days exposure, the body burden of nonmotabolised lauric acid increased with increasing of exposure concentrations. Only a small fraction of the radioactivity (3–15%) recovered from fish was associated with nonmetabolized lauric acid.
Estimated lauric acid bioconcentration factors in zebrafish:
Nominal laurate concn. [mg/L] |
Mean measured water conc. [mg/L] |
Lauric acid body burden [mg/kg] (no. fish) |
Bioconcentration factor (BCF) [L/kg] |
2.0 |
2.21 |
538 (3), 517 (4), 551 (4) |
243, 234, 249 |
3.6 |
3.69 |
1040 (3), 996 (3), 871 (4) |
282, 270, 236 |
6.4 |
6.60 |
1570 (3), 1900 (3) |
238, 288 |
Mean |
255 ± 22 |
1) wet weight
Although this study was not designed to measure the bioconcentration of lauric acid, according to OECD guidance, the estimated time to reach 95% of steady state is 78 h (3.3 days, based on logKow = 4.6), is well within the duration of the test. Hence, the estimated bioconcentration factors derived from the measured body burdens of nonmetabolised lauric acid and average test media concentrations of 255 ± 22 can be applied to justify the bioconcentration of lauric acid as well.
Description of key information
Weight of evidence: Based on the estimation of BCF by BCFBAF v3.01 model of EPI Suite v4.11 for ammonium stearate and ammonium palmitate (BCF = 70.79), and the experimental results obtained on sodium laurate (BCF = 255 L/Kg), the weight of evidence approach was applied and the BCF for the substance Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered), ammonium salts was determined to be 255 L/Kg based on the worst case assumption.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- BCF (aquatic species):
- 255 L/kg ww
Additional information
Weight of Evidence Approach (see rationale attached in IUCLID5 Section 13):
The bioaccumulation factor of ammonium stearate and ammonium palmitate, constituents of the substance Fatty acids, C16 -18 (even numbered), ammonium salts, were calculated by BCFBAF v3.01model of EPI Suite v4.11. For both constituents the BCF was estimated to be 70.79 L/kg wet-wt (log BCF from regression-based method = 1.850). A a study reported by Van Egmond R et al. (1999), the bioaccumulation to zebrafish (Danio rerio) of sodium laurate was analyzed in a 28 day growth rate study. Fish were exposed to the test item up to 20 mg/L for 28 days under flow-through conditions. At test termination, the tissues were analyzed. Laurate was extensively biotransformed to metabolites, including less polar compounds, possibly triacylglycerols. The bioconcentration factor of laurate was estimated to be 255 L/kg.
Based on the available data, the weight of evidence approach was applied and the bioaccumulation factor of the substance Fatty acids, C16 -18 (even numbered), ammonium salts was determined to be 255 L/kg (based on the worst case assumption).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.