Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Groups of 24 Mice of CD1 strain (12 female, 12 male) were fed with 300ppm, 1000ppm and 3000ppm of coumarin respectively for 13 weeks respectively. control animals were given withour coumarin in the diet. After 13 weeks, the animals were killed. Gorss necropsies performed, and all lesions examined microscopically.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Coumarin
EC Number:
202-086-7
EC Name:
Coumarin
Cas Number:
91-64-5
Molecular formula:
C9H6O2
IUPAC Name:
2H-chromen-2-one
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
-Name of test material: Coumarin
-Substance type: Pure substance
-Physical state: White crystalline powder
-Analytical purity: not known
-Lot/batch No.: Batch no. CA 78300-01
-Storage condition of test material: stored at room temperature, in a laboratory fume cupboard untile use.

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CD-1
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Test animals
-Source: Charles River Laboratories (UK), Manston, Kent, England
-Age at study initiation: 24 days
-Weight at study initiation: 2g
-Hosing: The animals were housed four to a cage in opaque, polypropylene cages(North Kent Plastics Ltd.)
-Diet: Spratts Laboratory Diet No.2 (low fat)
-Water: free access to tap water
-Acclimation period: 7 days
Environmental conditions:
-Temperature: 22℃
- Humidity: 50%
- Lighting control: 12 hours light and 12 hours dark per 24 hours.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: Spratts Laboratory Diet No.2 (low fat)
Details on oral exposure:
Coumarin was administered by admixture with the diet. The required dietary concentrations were obtained by the dilution of a premix prepared each week. Control animals received normal (untreated) diet.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
A sample of all test diets fed during weeks 1 and 13 week taken at the time the diets were mixed and dispatched to HRC, Department of Analytical Chemistry. The sample were analysed for:
Concentrations of Coumarin in the test diest; Homogeneity of mixing, Stability of Coumarin in the diet; A validation of the analytical procedure used.
A sample of diet (10g), obtained by standard riffling techniques, was weighed directly into an extraction thimble and extracted(Soxhlet) with methanol(100ml) for 2 hours. On cooling, the methanol extract was diluted volumetrically to 250ml.
This solution was further diluted with methanol to produce a solution, containing coumarin in the concentration range 5-15μg/ml, suitable for analysis by the HPLC.
Results obtained for week 1 samples were within minus 15% of the nominal concentration. Results obtained for week 13 samples were in the range, minus 20-25% of nominal concentrations. This greater deviation from nominal, for the week 13 diets, was probably a result of losses occurring, during both blending of the test diet and prior to solvent extraction, at the higher ambient temperatures experienced at week 13.
Results of analysis of homogeneity samples indicated satisfactory mixing, and stability of the test compound in diet was confirmed during 14 days storage at ambient temperature in the animal rooms.
Procedural recovery values obtained during method validation and concurrently with the determination of stability and analysis of the blended samples indicated that the method was satisfactory for analyzing coumarin in diet over the concentration 100-5000ppm
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Daily, 7days each week
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 300, 1000, 3000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12 male and 12 female per dose
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
The object of this study, performed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England, was to determine a suitable high dietary level of Coumarin for a
long term study in mice.
Treatment levels used in this study were based on a 4-week preliminary study carried out at the Huntingdon Research Centre.
Positive control:
No data

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Clinical findings: no signs of reaction
Mortalities: no deaths.
Food consumption: food consumption by females receiving 3000 or 1000ppm was marginally lower than that of the controls.
Growth: Growth of males receiving 3000 ppm was marginally inferior to that of the controls.
Food utilisation efficiency: Associated in part with the effect upon growth rate, inferior food conversion efficiency was noted for males receiving 3000ppm.
Other examinations:
None
Statistics:
The following parameters were analyzed statistically: mean food consumption, mean bodyweight change, mean organ weight.
Mean values of all dose groups were compared to the mean value for the control group at each time interval.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Food efficiency:
no effects observed
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
Clinical findings: there were no overt signs of reaction to treatment.
Mortalities: There were no deaths.
Food consumption: Probably as a result of slight unpalatability, food consumption by females receiving 3000 or 1000 ppm was marginally lower than that of he controls. Females receiving 300 ppm and males of all treated groups were not thus affected.
Growth: Growth of males receving 3000 ppm was marginally inferior to that of the controls. Growth of treated females and of males receiving 1000 or 300 ppm was not impaired by treatment.
Food utilization efficiency: Associated in part with the effect upon growth rate, inferior food conversion efficiency was noted for males receiving
3000ppm. Efficiency of food utilization by the other treated groups was essentially similar to that of the controls.
Macroscopic pathology: There were no macroscopic findings that were considered to be related to treatment.
Organ weight analysis: Liver weights in treated males were marginally higher than those of the controls although liver weights in treated females were not thus affected. Ulterus weights of females treated with 3000ppm or 1000ppm although it should be noted that histopathological examination did not reveal any changes at the cellular level. There were no other intergroup differences in organ weights that were considered to be related to
treatment.
Histopathological findings: An increase in the incidence and severity of vacuolation of centrilobular hepatocytes was seen armong female mice
receiving 3000ppm, although males receiving this level of treatment did not show this change. There were no other changes in mice receiving 3000 ppm that were considered to be related to treatment.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
> 138.3 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
act. ingr.
Sex:
female

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The only evidence ot toxicity was marginal effect on growth among males receiving 3000ppm and an effect on the livers of females receiving 3000ppm. NOAEL corresponding to 1000ppm expressed as 138.3 mg/kg bw in females.
Executive summary:

Introduction:

The object of this study, performed at the Huntingdon Research Centre, England, was to determine a suitable high dietary of coumarin for a long term study in mice. Treatment levels used in this study were based on a 4-week preliminary study carried out at the Huntingdon Research Centre. This report presents all the data obtained in the study.

Result and discussion:

Clinical finding, food consumption, growth and food utilization efficiency ware examined during the testing. At termination, macroscopic pathology, organ weight analysis and histopathological findings were examined.

Conclusion:

The only evidence of toxicity was marginal effect on growth among males receiving 3000ppm and an effect on the livers of females receiving 3000ppm. NOAEL corresponding to 1000ppm expressed as 138.3 mg/kg bw in females.