Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Bacterial reverse mutation assay:

In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce point mutations by base-pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.

Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation AssayI:

n conclusion, in the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.

Chromosome aberration test:

In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described in vitro chromosome aberration test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line.Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1990
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Use of S. typhimurium strain TA 1538 instead of strain TA 102.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: Phosphoric acid, mixed decyl and octyl esters, compds. with diethanolamine (Phosphorsaeure (C8-C10-Alkyl)-ester, DEA-Salz)
CAS No.: 68425-57-0 (68186-45-8)
Physical state: white solid at 20 °C (turbid, non-pourable paste)
Target gene:
The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system measures his- → his+ reversions. The S. typhimurium strains are constructed to differentiate between base pair (TA 100, TA 1535) and frameshift (TA 98, TA 1537, TA 1538) mutations.
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Remarks:
S. typhimurium TA 98 his D3052 rfa- uvrB- R+
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Remarks:
S. typhimurium TA 100 his G46 rfa- uvrB- R+
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Remarks:
G46 rfa- uvrB-
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Remarks:
his C3076 rfa- uvrB-
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Remarks:
his D3052 rfa- uvrB-
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The test substance was tested in two independent test series (plate incorporation assay) at concentration ranges of 8.0 - 5000 µg/plate (first test) and 6.25 - 1600 µg/plate (second test and repetition). Toxic effects were noted at concentrations of 200 µg/plate or higher.
Vehicle / solvent:
Aqua dest.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
other: 2-aminoanthracene: TA 98 (-S9/+S9), TA 1535 (-S9/+S9), TA 100 (-S9/+S9); TA 1537 (-S9), TA 1538 (-S9/+S9); 4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine: TA 98 (-S9/+S9), TA 1538 (-S9/+S9);
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
In order to investigate the potential of the test item for its ability to induce gene mutations the plate incorporation test (experiment I & II) was performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538. In two independent experiments several concentrations of the test item were used. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate.
Solutions of the test substance were prepared in aqua dest. and diluted in aqua dest. just before use. The following concentrations were tested:

1st test: 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 pg/plate
2nd test: 6.25, 25, 100, 400 and 1600 pg/plate (and repetition)
Evaluation criteria:
A combination of the following criteria was considered as a positive result:

- The plate background of non-reverted bacteria did not show any growth reduction versus the respective negative controls.

- The spontaneous mutation rates of each tester strain per plate were within the characteristic spontaneous mutation range.

- As a rule, the positive controls showed mutation rates exceeding the control values of TA 100 at least by the factor 2.0 and those of the other tester strains at least by the factor 3.0.

- At more than one dose tested, the test substance caused at least a 2.0-fold increase in comparison with the negative controls in the tester strain TA 100. For the other tester strains, an increase in the mutation rate of more than 3.0 above the corresponding negative controls was considered positive.
Statistics:
According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Aqua dest.
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Sodium azide & 2-Aminoanthracene (-S9/+S9)
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Aqua dest.
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Sodium azide & 2-Aminoanthracene (-S9/+S9)
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Aqua dest.
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
9-Aminoacridine & 2-Aminoanthracene (-S9/+S9)
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine & 2-Aminoanthracene (-S9/+S9)
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
Aqua dest.
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
4-Nitro-o-phenylendiamine & 2-Aminoanthracene (-S9/+S9)
Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce point mutations by base-pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Therefore, the test item is not considered to be mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Executive summary:

In order to investigate the potential of the test item for its ability to induce gene mutations two plate incorporation tests (experiment I & II) were performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538. No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation in experiment I and II. All criteria of validity were met.

In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce point mutations by base-pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
other: Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: Phosphoric acid, mixed decyl and octyl esters, compds. with diethanolamine
CAS No.: 68425-57-0
Physical state: white solid at 20 °C (turbid, non-pourable paste)
Batch No.: PU61810016
Re-certification date of batch: 16 June 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Moisture, % (KF) 1,2
pH, 10% in dW 7,2
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light
Target gene:
Thymidine Kinase Locus/TK+/-
Species / strain / cell type:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y cells (clone TK+/- -3.7.2C). These cells are characterised by their high proliferation rate (10-12 h doubling time of the Eurofins Munich stock cultures) and their cloning efficiency, usually more than 50%. The cells obtain a near diploid karyotype (40 ± 2 chromosomes). They are heterozygous at the Thymidine Kinase (TK) locus in order to detect mutation events at the TK- locus.
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: TK+/- -3.7.2C
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiment was based on data from the pre-experiment. In the main experiment without metabolic activation 95 µg/mL and with metabolic activation 120 µg/mL were selected as the highest concentrations. The experiment without and with metabolic activation was performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay.
Vehicle / solvent:
Treatment medium RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5 % Horse serum, 100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
RPMI cell culture medium
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
RPMI cell culture medium
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
ethylmethanesulphonate
methylmethanesulfonate
Evaluation criteria:
The test item is considered mutagenic if the following criteria are met:
- The induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126
mutants per 10^6 cells and
- a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.

Besides, combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (≥40% of total colonies) is an indication for potentialclastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations. According to the OECD guideline, the biological relevance is considered first for the interpretation of result. Statistical methods might be used as an aid in evaluation of the test result. A test item is considered to be negative if the induced mutant frequency is below the GEF and the trend of the test is negative.
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
RPMI cell culture
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MMS & EMS
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
RPMI cell culture
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MMS & EMS

Results

The test item was assessed for a possible potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y. The assay was conducted without and with metabolic activation. The experiment with metabolic activation was performed by including liver microsomes and NADP for efficient detection of a wide variety of carcinogens requiring metabolic activation. The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiment was based on data from the preexperiment according to the OECD guideline 490. In the main experiment without metabolic activation 95 µg/mL and with metabolic activation 120 µg/mL were selected as the highest concentrations. The experiment without and with metabolic activation was performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay. The test item was investigated at the following concentrations:

without metabolic activation:

50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 95 µg/mL

and with metabolic activation:

70, 80, 90, 95, 100, 110, 115 and 120 µg/mL

The pH-value detected with the test item was within the physiological range.

Precipitation:

No precipitation of the test item was noted in the experiment.

Toxicity:

Growth inhibition was observed in the main experiment without and with metabolic activation.In the main experiment without metabolic activation the relative total growth (RTG) was 13.5% for

the highest concentration (95 µg/mL) evaluated. The highest concentration evaluated with metabolic activation was 120 µg/mL with a RTG of 11.2%.

Mutagenicity:

The mutant frequencies obtained from all experiments were compared with the Global Evaluation Factor (GEF) and a statistical analysis was performed. The GEF is defined as the mean of the negative/vehicle mutant frequency plus one standard deviation; data are gathered from ten laboratories. For the microwell method the GEF was defined to be 126. Criterion for mutagenicity is the extension of the GEF by the induced mutant frequency as well as a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency. The positive controls EMS (300 µg/mL), MMS (10 µg/mL) and B[a]P (2.5 µg/mL) showed distinct effects in mutation frequency, thus proving the ability of the test system to detect potential mutagenic effects. In the main experiment without metabolic activation all validity criteria were met. The negative controls showed mutant frequencies within the acceptance range of 50-170 mutants/10^6 cells, according to the IWGT criteria. The mutant frequencies of the negative control were 52.2 and 59.8 mutants/106 cells, the positive controls EMS and MMS induced a distinct increase in mutant frequency with 612.8 and 402.9 mutants/10^6 cells. The mutant frequencies induced by the test item did not show a biologically relevant increase. The GEF of 126 was not exceeded in any of the dose groups showing induced mutant frequencies between -4.4 and 44.5 mutants/106 cells (Table 5). A statistical analysis displayed that one of the mutant frequencies was significantly increased over those of the negative controls, but neither the GEF was exceeded nor evidence for a dose-response relationship was noted. Therefore this effect was considered as not biologically relevant. In the main experiment with metabolic activation all validity criteria were met. The negative controls showed mutant frequencies within the acceptance range of 50-170 mutants/10^6 cells, according to the IWGT criteria. The mutant frequencies of the negative control were 50.1 and 73.1 mutants/10^6  cells, the positive control B[a]P induced a distinct increase in mutant frequency with 604.2 mutants/10^6 cells. The mutant frequencies induced by the test item did not show a biologically relevant increase. The GEF of 126 was not exceeded in any of the dose groups showing induced mutant frequencies between -11.6 and 26.5 mutants/10^6 cells. None of the observed mutant frequencies was statistically significantly increased over those of the negative controls. All mutant frequencies for negative and positive controls of the main experiment were found within the historical range of the test facility Eurofins Munich.

Clastogenicity:

Colony sizing was performed for the highest concentrations of the test item and for the negative and positive controls. An extension of the GEF by the induced mutant frequency in combination with an increased occurrence of small colonies (defined by slow growth and/or morphological alteration of the cell clone) is an indication for potential clastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations. The positive controls MMS (10 µg/mL) and B[a]P (2.5 µg/mL) induced a significant increase in mutant frequency and a biologically significant increase of small colonies (≥40%), thus proving the ability of

the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects. In the main experiment without metabolic activation the percentage of small colonies in the negative controls was found to be 8.6% and 6.4%. The percentage of small colonies in the positive control MMS was found to be 49.4%. In the highest dose groups 6.8% (80 µg/mL), 19.4% (90 µg/mL) and 8.3% (95 µg/mL) of small colonies were found (Table 6). As none of the values exceeded 40%, all dose groups were considered as not clastogenic. With metabolic activation the percentage of small colonies in the negative controls was found to be 6.7% and 11.1%. The percentage of small colonies of the positive control B[a]P was found to be 57.8%. In the highest dose groups 8.5% (110 µg/mL), 12.1% (115 µg/mL) and 7.0% (120 µg/mL) of small colonies were found. As none of the values exceeded 40%, all dose groups were considered as not clastogenic.

Tables

Pre-Experiment for Toxicity, without metabolic activation

Test Group

 Concentration [µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment 

 Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

 Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

Suspension Growth (SG) a

Relative Suspension Growth (RSG) [%] b

 C1

 0

 299000

 911000

 1560000

 14.2

 100.0

 C2

 0

 309000

 922000

 1600000

 14.8

 100.0

 1

 10

 267000

 871000

 1570000

 13.7

94.4

 2

 20

 313000

 947000

 1580000

 15.0

 103.3

 3

 50

 308000

 999000

 1510000

 15.1

 104.2

 4

 150

 30800

 18500

 48100

 0.1

 1.0

 5

 500

 42600

 n.d.

 n.d.

 6

 1000

 2130

 n.d.

 n.d.

C: Negative control

a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24h x 30) / 1x10^7) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h*x20))];

* : for value 24 h > 3x10^5 then value 24 h = 3x10^5

b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]

†: no viable cells

n.d.: no data

Pre-Experiment for Toxicity, with metabolic activation

Test Group

 Concentration [µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment 

 Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

 Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

Suspension Growth (SG) a

Relative Suspension Growth (RSG) [%] b

 C1

 0

 312000

 1020000

 1560000

 15.9

 100.0

 C2

 0

 323000

 981000

 1570000

 15.4

 100.0

 1

 10

 311000

 913000

 1580000

 14.4

92.1

 2

 20

 331000

 997000

 1510000

 15.1

 96.2

 3

 50

 305000

 946000

 1550000

 14.7

 93.7

 4

 150

 28600

 33700

 163000

 0.5

 3.1

 5

 500

 2690

 n.d.

 n.d.

C: Negative control

a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24h x 30) / 1x10^7) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h*x20))];

* : for value 24 h > 3x10^5 then value 24 h = 3x10^5

b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]

†: no viable cells

n.d.: no data

Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, without metabolic activation

Test Group

Concentration [µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

 

Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

 
 

Suspension Growth (SG) a

 
 

Relative Suspension Growth (RSG) [%] b

 
Relative Cloning Efficiency (RCE) c

Relative Total Growth (RTG) d

 C1  0  318000  938000  1480000  13.9  100.0  100.0  100.0
 C2  0  337000  1010000  1430000  14.4  100.0  100.0  100.0
 1

 50

 293000  900000  1540000  13.9  97.9  97.0  94.9
 2  60  350000  996000  1580000  15.7  111.1  108.9  121.0
 3  70  276000  707000  1630000  11.5  81.4  89.7  73.0
 4  80

 282000

 800000  1520000  12.2  85.9  92.5  79.4
 5  90  182000  351000  756000  5.2  36.4  87.0

 31.7

 6

 95

 111000

 137000

 756000

 2.3

 16.0

 84.4

 13.5

 EMS

 300

 327000

 781000

 1430000

 11.2

 78.9

 73.0

 57.5

 MMS

 10

 315000

 782000

 1390000

 10.9

 76.7

 69.9

 53.9

C: Negative control

a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24hx30)/1x10^7) x ((value 48 h x 20)/(value 24 h*x20))];

* : for value 24h > 3x10^5 then value 24h = 3x10^5

b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]

c: Relative Cloning Efficiency, RCE = [(CE dose group / CE of corresponding controls) x 100]

Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-LN (((96 - (mean P1,P2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)

d: Relative Total Growth, RTG = (RSG x RCE)/100

EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate

MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate

Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, without metabolic activation

   

Cloning Efficiency (CE)

     Mutagenicity Data            

Test Group

Concentration [µg/mL]

 Plate 1 e Plate 2 e Cloning Efficiency (CE) f Number of cultures / 96 wells        

MF     

[mutants/

10^6 cells]

 g

IMF     

[mutants/

10^6 cells]

 h

 

 

 

 

 

 Plate 1 e

 

Plate 2 e

 

 

Plate 3 e

 

 

Plate 4

 e

Mean 

 

 

 C1

 0

 73

 75

 92.1

 13

 7

 5

 10

 8.8

 52.2

 /

 C2

0

 78

 81

 110.1

 7

 12

 18

 10

 11.8

 59.8

 /

 1

 50

 81

 71

 98.0

 10

 9

 13

 7

 9.8

 54.8

 -1.2

 2

 60

 79

 80

 110.1

 8

 7

 15

 11

 10.3

 51.6

 -4.4

 3

 70

 72

 75

 90.7

 9

 17

 15

 14

 13.8

 85.6

 29.6

 4

 80

 74

 75

 93.5

 13

 11

 11

 9

 11.0

 65.1

 9.1

 5

 90

 70

 75

 88.0

 20

 13

 17

 12

 15.5

 100.6

 44.5

 6

 95

 74

 69

 85.4

 12

 10

 15

 11

 12.0

 78.4

 22.3

 EMS

 300

 66

 67

 73.7

 59

 52

 60

 57

 57.0

 612.8

 556.7

 MMS  10  63  67  70.6  40  35  46  45  41.5  402.9  346.9

C: Negative control

e: Number of cultures with cell growth.

f: Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-LN (((96 - (mean P1,P2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)

g: Mutant frequency,

MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800

h: Induced mutant frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls

EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate

MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate

Main Experiment - Colony Sizing, without metabolic activation

 Test group

Concentration [µg/mL]

Wells with

at least  

1 colony

 Large colonies  Small colonies  % small colonies
 C1  0  35

 32

 3

 8.6

 C2

 0

 47

 44

 3

 6.4

 4

 80

 44

 41

 3

 6.8

 5

 90

 62

 50

 12

 19.4

 6

95

 48

 44

 4

 8.3

 MMS

 10

 166

 84

 82

 49.4

C: Negative control

MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate

Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, with metabolic activation

Test Group

Concentration [µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

 

Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

 
 

Suspension Growth (SG) a

 
 

Relative Suspension Growth (RSG) [%] b

 
Relative Cloning Efficiency (RCE) c

Relative Total Growth (RTG) d

 C1  0  287000  768000  1570000  12.1  100.0  100.0  100.0
 C2  0  298000  785000  1530000  12.0  100.0  100.0  100.0
 3

 70

 278000  768000  1620000  12.4  103.4  107.0  110.6
 4  80  299000  821000  1630000  13.4  111.2  97.8  108.7
 5  90  248000  726000  1580000  11.5  95.3  100.7  96.0
 6  95

 283000

 753000  1580000  11.9  98.9  110.3  109.0
 7  100  219000  528000  1620000  8.6  71.1  119.3

 84.8

 8

 110

 222000

 374000

 1580000

 5.9

 49.1

 123.3

 60.5

 9

 115

 139000

 154000

 883000

 2.6

 22.0

 112.0

 24.7

10

 120

 123000

 95200

 446000

 1.3

 11.1

 100.7

 11.2

 B[a]P  2.5  242000  369000  1390000  5.1  42.6  75.5  32.2

C: Negative control

a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24hx30)/1x10^7) x ((value 48 h x 20)/(value 24 h*x20))];

* : for value 24h > 3x10^5 then value 24h = 3x105

b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]

c: Relative Cloning Efficiency, RCE = [(CE dose group / CE of corresponding controls) x 100)

Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-LN (((96 - (mean P1,P2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100

d: Relative Total Growth, RTG = (RSG x RCE)/100

B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene

Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, with metabolic activation

   

Cloning Efficiency (CE)

     Mutagenicity Data            

Test Group

Concentration [µg/mL]

 Plate 1 e Plate 2 e Cloning Efficiency (CE) f Number of cultures / 96 wells        

MF     

[mutants/

10^6 cells]

 g

IMF     

[mutants/

10^6 cells]

 h

 

 

 

 

 

 Plate 1 e

 

Plate 2 e

 

 

Plate 3 e

 

 

Plate 4

 e

Mean 

 

 

 C1

 0

 64

 76

 81.6

 6

 9

 4

 11

 7.5

 50.1

 /

 C2

0

 69

 74

 85.4

 12

 9

 13

 11

 11.3

 73.1

 /

 3

 70

 71

 75

 89.3

 6

 10

 13

 14

 10.8

 66.9

 5.3

 4

 80

 70

 70

 81.6

 10

 6

 5

 9

 7.5

 50.0

 -11.6

 5

 90

 73

 69

 84.1

 13

 5

 16

 8

 10.5

 69.6

 8.0

 6

 95

 74

 74

 92.1

 14

 13

 12

 11

 12.5

 75.8

 14.2

 7

 100

 79

 74

 99.6

 10

 14

 13

 13

 12.5

 70.1

 8.5

 8

 110

 77

 78

 102.9

 13

 14

 9

 11

 11.8

 63.6

 2.0

 9

 115

 76

 73

 93.5

 14

 20

 10

 14

 14.5

 88.1

 26.5

10  120  65 77  84.1  14  11  10  8  10.8  70.8  9.2
 B[a]P  2.5  60  62  63.1  49  48  49  58  51.0  604.2  542.6

C: Negative control

e: Number of cultures with cell growth.

f: Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-LN (((96 - (mean P1,P2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)

g: Mutant frequency,

MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800

h: Induced mutant frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls

B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene

Main Experiment - Colony Sizing, with metabolic activation

 Test group

Concentration [µg/mL]

Wells with

at least  

1 colony

 Large colonies  Small colonies  % small colonies
 C1  0  30

 28

 2

 6.7

 C2

 0

 45

 40

 5

 11.1

 8

110

 47

 43

 4

 8.5

 9

115

 58

 51

 7

 12.1

 10

120

 43

 40

 3

 7.0

 B[a]P

 2.5

 204

 86

 118

 57.8

C: Negative control

B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene

Statistical significance at the 5% level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.

Biometry - Main Experiment without metabolic activation

  Test group

Concentration [µg/mL]

 mean mutant frequency   mean induced mutant frequency  p-value  statistical significance
 C1  0  52.2  /  /  /
 C2  0  59.8  /  /  /
 1  50  54.8  -1.2  > 0.999  -
 2  60  51.6  -4.4  0.715  -
 3  70  85.6  29.6  0.109  -
 4  80  65.1  9.1  0.346  -
 5  90  100.6  44.5  0.028  +
 6  95  78.4  22.3  0.109  -
 EMS  300  612.8  556.7  0.004  +
 MMS  10  402.9  346.9  0.004  +

C: Negative control

EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate

MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate

+: significant

-: not significant

Statistical significance at the 5% level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test.

Biometry - Main Experiment with metabolic activation

  Test group

Concentration [µg/mL]

 mean mutant frequency   mean induced mutant frequency  p-value  statistical significance
 C1  0  50.1  /  /  /
 C2  0  73.1  /  /  /
 3  70  66.9  5.3  0.570  -
 4  80  50.0  -11.6  0.348  -
 5  90  69.6  8.0  0.683  -
 6 95  75.8  14.2  0.214  -
 7  100  70.1 8.5  0.655 -
 8  110  63.6  2.0  0.849  -
 9  115  88.1  26.5  0.141  -
 10  120  70.8  9.2  0.683  -

B[a]P

 2.5  604.2  542.6  0.004  +

C: Negative control

B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene

+: significant

-: not significant

Conclusions:
In conclusion, in the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
Executive summary:

The test item was assessed for a possible potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y.The assay was conducted without and with metabolic activation. The experiment with metabolic activation was performed by including liver microsomes and NADP for efficient detection of a wide variety of carcinogens requiring metabolic activation. The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiment was based on data from the pre-experiment according to the OECD guideline 490. In the main experiment without metabolic activation 95 µg/mL and with metabolic activation 120 µg/mL were selected as the highest concentrations. The experiment without and with metabolic activation was performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay. In the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
other: In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: Phosphoric acid, mixed decyl and octyl esters, compds. with diethanolamine
CAS No.: 68425-57-0
Physical state: white solid at 20 °C (turbid, non-pourable paste)
Batch No.: PU61810016
Re-certification date of batch: 16 June 2018
Purity: 100 % (UVCB)
Moisture, % (KF) 1,2
pH, 10% in dW 7,2
Stability: stable under test conditions
Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light
Target gene:
Induction of structural chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells.
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Cell bank of Eurofins Munich
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
A pre-experiment was conducted under identical conditions as described for the main experiment. The following concentrations were tested without and with S mix: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2000 and 5000 µg/mL
Cytotoxicity was characterised by the percentages of the relative increase in cell count (RICC) in comparison with the controls.
Vehicle / solvent:
A solubility test was performed with different solvents up to the maximum recommended concentration of 5 mg/mL. Due to the nature of the test item, it was not possible to prepare a solution of the test item with an appropriate solvent. Based on the results of the solubility test, the best suited vehicle was MEM cell culture medium. For osmolality 331 mOsmol/kg was measured in the highest concentration of 5 mg/mL and the pH was within the physiological range. Different test item concentrations were prepared by dilution of the 5 mg/mL test item suspension in cell culture medium. The solvent was compatible with the survival of the cells and the S9 activity.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
MEM medium
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
ethylmethanesulphonate
Evaluation criteria:
Providing that all acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
a) at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) the increase is dose-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c) any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data

When all of these criteria are met, the test chemical is then considered able to induce chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system.

Providing that all acceptability criteria are fulfilled, a test chemical is considered clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined
a) none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
b) there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test,
c) all results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data.

The test chemical is then considered unable to induce chromosomal aberrations in cultured mammalian cells in this test system.
Statistics:
Statistical significance at the 5% level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by the Fischer´s exact test. The p value was used as a limit in judging for significance levels in comparison with the corresponding negative control. Aberrant cells without gaps were only used for the calculation. Gaps are recorded separately and reported but generally not included in the total aberration frequency calculation according to the guideline.
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MEM medium
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MEM medium
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
EMS, ethylmethanesulfonate(-S9);
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MEM medium
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
MEM medium
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
CPA, cyclophosphamide (+S9);

Results

Exposure Concentrations

On the basis of the data and the observations from the pre experiment and taking into account the recommendations of the guidelines, the following concentrations were selected for the main experiments I and II. The dose group selection for microscopic analyses of chromosomal aberrations was based in accordance with the recommendations of the guidelines.

4h exposure, -S9: 5, 10, 20 µg/ml

4h exposure, +S9: 40, 60, 70 µg/ml

21h exposure, -S9: 20, 30, 50 (P) µg/ml

P = Precipitation was observed at the end of treatment

Discussion

In an in vitro chromosome aberration assay, the test item was investigated for the potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation with S9 homogenate. The selection of the concentrations used in experiment I and II was based on data from the solubility test and the pre-experiment which were performed according to the guidelines. In experiment I without metabolic activation, 20 µg/mL and with metabolic activation, 70 µg/mL were selected as highest concentrations for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations. In experiment II without metabolic activation, 50 µg/mL was selected as highest test item concentration for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations. The chromosomes were prepared 21 h after start of treatment with the test item. The treatment intervals were 4 h without and with metabolic activation (experiment I) and 21 h without metabolic activation (experiment II). Duplicate cultures were set up. 150 metaphases per culture were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations.

Experiment I:

without metabolic activation: 5, 10 and 20 µg/mL

with metabolic activation: 40, 60 and 70 µg/mL

Experiment II:

without metabolic activation: 20, 30 and 50 µg/mL

Precipitation

Precipitation was noted in experiment I without metabolic activation at a concentration of 50 µg/mL and with metabolic activation at 150 µg/mL. In experiment II without metabolic activation, precipitation was observed at a concentration of 50 µg/mL.

Toxicity

Cytotoxic effects of the test item (decrease below 70% rel. RICC) were noted in experiment I without metabolic activation at a concentration of 20 µg/mL (RICC 63%). At a concentration of 30 µg/mL and higher almost each cell was destroyed. In experiment I with metabolic activation, no cytotoxic effects were determined at a concentration of 70 µg/mL (RICC 76%). However, at the test item concentration of 80 µg/mL and higher, the RICC was decreased to 0%. Because of the steep increase in cytotoxicity despite closely spaced concentrations, the concentrations 20 µg/mL and 70 µg/mL were evaluated for chromosomal aberrations. In experiment II without metabolic activation, no cytotoxic effects were detected up to a concentration of 50 µg/mL (RICC 91%).

Clastogenicity

There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a concentration-related increase or a reproducible increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations for at least one of the dose groups, which is higher than the laboratory negative control range. In experiment I without metabolic activation the aberration rates of the negative control (2.7%) and all concentrations treated with the test item (5 µg/mL: 1.7%; 10 µg/mL: 2.3% and 20 µg/mL: 3.0%) were within the historical control data of the testing facility (0.0% – 4.0%). With metabolic activation, the aberration rates of the negative control (1.7%) and all test item concentrations (40 µg/mL and 60 µg/mL: 1.3%; 70 µg/mL: 2.0%) were within the historical control data of the testing facility (0.0% – 4.3%).

In experiment II without metabolic activation, the aberration rates of the negative control (2.3%) and the following concentrations treated with the test item (20 µg/mL: 1.7% and 50 µg/mL: 1.3%) were within the historical control data of the testing facility (0.0% – 3.0%). An increase of aberrant cells was noted at a concentration of 30 µg/mL (4.0%). However, this increase was considered as not biologically relevant as the next higher concentration was within the historical control range. Moreover, the induction was neither statistically significant nor a concentration-related increase was detected. The Fisher´s exact test was performed to verify the results in the experiment. No statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) of cells with chromosomal aberrations was noted in the dose groups of the test item evaluated in experiment I and II without and with metabolic activation.The chi square Test for trend was performed to test whether there is a concentration-related increase in chromosomal aberrations. No statistically significant increase was observed in experiment I without and with metabolic activation and in experiment II without metabolic activation.

EMS (600 µg/mL) and CPA (0.83 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and induced distinct and biologically relevant increases in cells with structural chromosomal aberrations, thus proving the ability of the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects.

Polyploid Cells

No biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid cells was found after treatment with the test item.

Tables:

Experiment I - Summary of Cytotoxicity Data

Cell count                  
Dose group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Culture        RICC [%]   Precipitate (+/-)
 without metabolic activation    1  2  mean    
 C  154  139  147  100  -
 1 5  128  113  121  81  -
 2  10  142  132  137  93  -
 3  20  103  90  97  63  -
 4  30  5  6  6  0  -
 5  40  0  0  0  0  -
 6  50  0  0  0  0  +
 7  60  n.d.  n.d.  -  -  +
 8  80  n.d.  n.d.  -  -  +
 9  100  n.d.  n.d.  -  -  +
 EMS  600          -
             
with metabolic activation            
 C  0  148  170  159  100  -
 1  40  148  120  134  83  -
 2  60  146  154  150  94  -
 3  70  112  134  123  76  -
 4  80  12  5  9  0  -
 5  100  1  4  3  0  -
 6  120  0  0  0  0  -
 7  150  n.d.  n.d.  -  -  +
 8  200  n.d.  n.d.  -  -  +
 CPA  0.83  120  131  126  78  -

RICC: Relative Increase in Cell Count, calculated by the increase in cell number of the test concentrations compared to the control concentration. The cell count was determined by a cell counter per culture for each test group.

C: Negative Control (Culture Medium)

EMS: Positive Control (without metabolic activation: Ethylmethanesulfonate)

CPA: Positive Control (with metabolic activation: Cyclophosphamide)

n.d: not determined

Experiment I – Summary of Aberration Rates

 Dose Group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Treatment time [h]  Fixation Interval [h]  mean abberant cells     Precipitation
 without metabolic activation        incl. gaps  excl. gaps  
 C  0  4  21  5.3  2.7  -
 1  5  4  21  2.3  1.7  -
 2  10  4  21  3.3  2.3  -
 3  20  4  21  5.3  3.0  -
EMS   600  4 21   12.8  9.2  -
             
 with metabolic activation            
 C  0  4  21  3.3  1.7  -
 1  40  4  21  3.0  1.3  -
 2  60  4  21  3.3  1.3  -
 3  70  4  21  3.7  2.0  -
 CPA  0.83  4  21  9.7  7.0  -

300 cells were evaluated for each concentration, except for the positive control EMS without metabolic activation (250 cells), because of a clearly positive result.

C: Negative Control (Culture Medium)

EMS: Positive Control (without metabolic activation: Ethylmethanesulfonate)

CPA: Positive Control (with metabolic activation: Cyclophosphamide)

Experiment II - Summary of Cytotoxicity Data

Cell count
Dose group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Culture        RICC [%]   Precipitate (+/-)
 without metabolic activation    1  2  mean    
 C  232  174  203  100  -
 1 0.1  204  216  210

 104

 -

 2

0.2

 184

 183

 184

 90

 -

 3

0.5

 201

 186

 194

 95

 -

 4

1

 148

 197

 173

 84

 -

 5

 2

 174

 193

 184

 90

 -

 6

 5

 228

 230

 229

 113

 -

 7

 10

 183

 173

 178

 87

 -

 8

 20

 205

 222

 214

 105

 -

 9

 30

 231

 250

 241

 119

 -

10

 50

 213

 158

 186

 91

 +

 EMS

 600

 153

 167

 160

 78

 -

RICC: Relative Increase in Cell Count, calculated by the increase in cell number of the test concentrations compared to the control concentration. The cell count was determined by a cell counter per culture for each test group.

C: Negative Control (Culture Medium)

EMS: Positive Control (without metabolic activation: Ethylmethanesulfonate)

Experiment II – Summary of Aberration Rates

 Dose Group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Treatment time [h]  Fixation Interval [h]  mean abberant cells     Precipitation
 without metabolic activation        incl. gaps  excl. gaps  
 C  0  21  21  4.0  2.3  -
 8  20  21  21  2.3  1.7  -
 9  30  21  21  5.0  4.0  -
 10  50  21  21  2.3  1.3  +
EMS   600  21 21   33.3  32.0  -

300 cells were evaluated for each concentration, except for the positive control EMS (150 cells), because of a clearly positive result.

C: Negative Control (Culture Medium)

EMS: Positive Control (without metabolic activation: Ethylmethanesulfonate)

Biometry

Statistical significance at the 5% level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by the Fischer´s exact test. The p value was used as a limit in judging for significance levels in comparison with the corresponding negative control. Aberrant cells without gaps were only used for the calculation. Gaps are recorded separately and reported but generally not included in the total aberration frequency calculation according to the guideline.

Biometry - Experiment I, without metabolic activation

Negative Control versus Test Group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Treatment time [h]  abberant cells (excl. gaps)  Significance  p value
 C  0  4  8  /  /
 1  5  4  5  -  0.5786
 2  10  4  7  1.0000
 3  20  4  9  -  1.0000
 EMS  600  4  23  +  0.0013

+: significantly increased

-: not significant

EMS: Positive Control (Ethylmethanesulfonate)

Biometry - Experiment I, with metabolic activation

Control versus Test Group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Treatment time [h]  abberant cells (excl. gaps)  Significance  p value
 C  0  4  5  /  /
 1  40  4  4  -  0.5786
 2  60  4  4  1.0000
 3  70  4  6  -  1.0000
 CPA  0.83  4  21  +  0.0020

+: significantly increased

-: not significant

CPA: Positive Control (Cyclophosphamide)

Biometry - Experiment II, without metabolic activation

Control versus Test Group  Concentration [µg/ml]  Treatment time [h]  abberant cells (excl. gaps)  Significance  p value
 C  0  21  7  /  /
 1  20  21  5  -  0.7721
 2  30  21  12  0.3515
 3  50  21  4  -  0.5450
 EMS  600  21  48  +  < 0.0001

+: significantly increased

-: not significant

EMS: Positive Control (Ethylmethanesulfonate)

Statistical significance at the 5% level (p < 0.05) was evaluated by the chi square test for trend. The p value was used as a limit in judging for significance levels.

Biometry – Trend test

 Experiment  Treatment time [h]  Significance  p value
 Exp. I without metabolic activation  4  -  0.2794
 Exp. I with metabolic activation  4  -  0.5094
 Exp. II without metabolic activation  21  -  0.7868

+: significant

-: not significant

Statistical significance: statistical significant concentration-related increase in cells with chromosomal aberrations (chi squaretest for trend, p < 0.05).

No biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid cells was found after treatment with the test item. Therefore, the test item the test item is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test.

Conclusions:
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described in vitro chromosome aberration test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line.
Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test.
Executive summary:

In an in vitro chromosome aberration assay, the test item was investigated for the potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster V79 cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation with S9 homogenate. The selection of the concentrations used in experiment I and II was based on data from the solubility test and the pre-experiment which were performed according to the guidelines.

In experiment I without metabolic activation, 20 µg/mL and with metabolic activation, 70 µg/mL were selected as highest concentrations for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations. In experiment II without metabolic activation, 50 µg/mL was selected as highest test item concentration for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations. The chromosomes were prepared 21 h after start of treatment with the test item. The treatment intervals were 4 h without and with metabolic activation (experiment I) and 21 h without metabolic activation (experiment II). Duplicate cultures were set up. 150 metaphases per culture were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations. It can be stated that during the described in vitro chromosome aberration test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line. No biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid cells was found after treatment with the test item.

Therefore, the test item the test item is considered to be non-clastogenic in this chromosome aberration test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification