Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-652-6 | CAS number: 109-16-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: not irritating (US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41, pre-GLP), applied to intact and abraded skin for
24 h under occlusive dressing; no skin reaction on intact skin
Eye irritation: not irritating (OECD guideline 405, GLP), slight redness in 1/3 animals after 1 h; no effects after 24, 48,
72 h
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1979
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, druge and cosmetics, by the Staft of the Division of Pharmacology, US FDA, skin toxicity according to Draize (1959)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- study performed before implementation of GLP
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Triethylenglykoldimethacrylat
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 to 2.6 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20°C
- Humidity (%):45 to 55%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: one site shaved/intact + one site shaved/abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated control sites on the same animals
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- Concentration (if solution): used as suppplied - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 72 h
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- The test material was applied to two clipped areas on each of six animals, one abraded and one left intact.
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Coverage ad wrap: Test sites were covered with medical strips which were fixed by leucoplast stripes. Whole animal trunk was wrapped in rubberized impervious cloth to minimize evaporation of the test substance. The animals were immobilized for the 24 hour exposure period.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no data
SCORING SYSTEM: erythema/eschar and edema scoring similar to OECD guideline 404 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Remarks:
- Study performed according to Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, druge and cosmetics, by the Staft of the Division of Pharmacology, US FDA, skin toxicity according to Draize (1959)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Remarks:
- Study performed according to Appraisal of the safety of chemicals in foods, druge and cosmetics, by the Staft of the Division of Pharmacology, US FDA, skin toxicity according to Draize (1959)
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact shaved skin, no scoring at 48 h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Intact skin:
No irritation was observed on intact skin.
Abraded skin:
1/6 animals showed very slight edema (score 1) after 24 h on abraded skin; this effect was fully reversible within 72 h. - Other effects:
- No other effects were reported.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this primary dermal irritation study in rabbit, TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study similar to US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41, 6 rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of TREGDMA (according to supplier's information: purity ca. 95%) to approximately 2.5 cm² skin area. Two application sites per animal were treated, one site was left intact, the other was abraded. Test sites were covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 72 hours. Irritation was scored similar to FHSA Federal guideline 16 CFR 1500.41. This scoring system is similar to OECD guideline 404.
No dermal irritation response was observed on intact skin. 1/6 animals showed very slight edema (score 1) after 24 h on abraded skin; this effect was fully reversible within 72 h.
In this study, TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant.
Study performance does not comply with requirements of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines, where a less vigorous application regime with semi-occlusive dressing, an exposure period of 4 hours, treatment of only intact skin is stipulated.
Thus, it can be assumed, that a substance which shows no irritating activity under the application regime of guideline US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41 will also be non irritating under the application regimes of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines. Therefore the study is adequate for C&L purposes.
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1997-07-01 to 1997-07-04
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Remarks:
- limited documentation of test data and substance purity
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (1981) and EEC guideline 84/449/EWG, B.4
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Three healthy adult rabbits of the New Zealand Whte strain were obtained from Harlan Interfauna
(UK) Ltd., Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, England.
They were in the weight range of 2.4 to 2.6 kg and approximately 10 to 11 weeks of age, prior to
treatment (Day 1). All rabbits were acclimatised to the experimental environrnent.
The rabbits were selected without conscious bias for the study. They were housed individually in meta1
cages with perforated floors in Building R 1 4 Room 5.
A standard laboratory diet SDS Stanrab (P) SQC Rabbit Diet and drinkmg water were provided ad
libitum.
The batch of diet used for the study was analysed for nutrients, contarninants and micro-organisms.
Results of routine physical and chemical examination of drinking water as conducted by the supplier,
are made available to Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd as quarterly sumrnaries.
Amal room temperature was maintained at 16 to 20°C and relative hurnidity at 52 - 72%. These
environmental pararneters were recorded daily. Air exchange was maintained at approximately 19 air
changes per hour and lighting was controlled by means of a time switch to give 12 hours of artificial
light (0700 - 1900 hours) in each 24 hours period.
Each animal was identified by a numbered aluminium tag placed through the edge of one ear. This
nurnber was unique within the Huntingdon Life Sciences Acute Toxicology Departrnent throughout the
duration of the study. Each cage was identified by a coloured labe1 displayng the study schedule
number, animal number and initials of the Study Director and Home Office licensee. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Untreated skin areas of the test animals serve as the control (clipped).
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 mL undiluted test substance
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Observation period:
- Examination of the treated skin was made on Day 1 (ie approximately 60 minutes after removal of the
dressings) and on Days 2, 3 and 4 (equivalent to 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure). - Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TREATMENT PROCEDURE
Approximately 24 hours prior to application of the test substance, hair was removed with electric
clippers from the dorso-lumbar region of each rabbit exposing an area of skm approximately 100 mm x100 mm.
Approximately 0.5 ml of the test substance was applied under a 25 mrn x 25 mrn gauze pad to one
intact skin site on each animal.
Each treatment site was covered with "Elastoplast" elastic adhesive dressing for four hours. The
animals were not restrained during the exposure period and were retumed to their cages immediately
after treatment.
At the end of the exposure penod, the semi-occlusive dressing and gauze pad were removed and the
treatment site was washed with warm water (30' to 40°C) to remove any residual test substance. The
treated area was blotted dry with absorbent Paper.
OBSERVATIONS
Clinical signs
All animals were observed daily for signs of ill health or toxicity
Dermal responses
Examination of the treated skin was made on Day 1 (ie approximately 60 minutes after removal of the dressings) and on Days 2, 3 and 4 (equivalent to 24, 48 and 72 hours after exposure).
SCORING SYSTEM:
Erythema and Eschar Formation
No erythema: 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible): 1
Well defined erythema: 2
Moderate to severe erythema: 3
Very severe erythema (beef redness) to eschar formation preventing grading of erythema: 4
Maximum possible: 4
Edema Formation
No edema: 0
Very slight edema (barely perceptible) : 1
Slight edem (edges of area well defined by definite raising):2
Moderate edema (raised approximately 1mm): 3
Severe edema (raised more than 1mm and extending beyond area of exposure):4
Maximum possible: 4 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Other effects:
- not observed
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Classification: not irritating
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study according to OECD TG 404, New Zealand white rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TREGDMA; CAS 109-16-0) for 72 hours. The mean erythema score was determined to be 0.00 out of 4 and, accordingly, the mean edema score 0.00 out of 4. Systemic toxic effects could not be detected as well.The results demonstrate that TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant. Therefore, the test substance has to be classified - according to GHS classification criteria - as non irritant to skin (GHS-hazard category: none).
NOTE: Any of data in this dataset are disseminated by the European Union on a right-to-know basis and this is not a publication in the same sense as a book or an article in a journal. The right of ownership in any part of this information is reserved by the data owner(s). The use of this information for any other, e.g. commercial purpose is strictly reserved to the data owners and those persons or legal entities having paid the respective access fee for the intended purpose.
Referenceopen allclose all
Overall primary irritation score (PDII): 0.0 of 8 scores FDA (Draize), 1959, re-evaluated according to OECD 404
|
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1994-09-12 to 1994-09-16
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 24 February 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): BISOMER TEGDMA
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 12 to 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.45 to 2.70 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): rabbit diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 – 21°C
- Humidity (%): 49 – 69%
- Air changes (per hr): app. 15/h
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated contralateral eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- eyes were not rinsed after application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scale, OECD guideline 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: light source from a standard ophthalmoscope - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- - in 1/3 animals grade 1 redness (vessels definitily injected above normal) was observed 1 h after application; 2/3 animals showed no irritating effects at 1 h after treatment
- all eyes appeared normal at the 24, 48 and 72 h observations - Other effects:
- no other effects reported
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- TREGDMA is not irritating to the rabbit eye.
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study according to OECD guideline 405, adopted 24 February 1987, and EU method B.5, 0.1 mL of TREGDMA (purity ca. 95% according to supplier) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of 3 young adult New Zealand White rabbits (1 male, 2 females) without washing. Animals then were observed for 3 days. Irritation was scored by the method of Draize.
No effects were observed in cornea and iris. Only minimal (grade 1) redness was observed in 1/3 animals 1 h after treatment. All eyes appeared normal at the 24, 48 and 72 h observations.
In this study, TREGDMA is not irritating to the rabbit eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reliable (RL=1-2),relevant and adequate data are available for the skin and eye irritation potential of TREGDMA.
Skin irritation
In a primary dermal irritation study similar to US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41, 6 rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of TREGDMA (according to supplier's information: purity ca. 95%) to approximately 2.5 cm² skin area. Two application sites per animal were treated, one site was left intact, the other was abraded. Test sites were covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 72 hours. Irritation was scored similar to FHSA Federal guideline 16 CFR 1500.41. This scoring system is similar to OECD guideline 404.
No dermal irritation response was observed on intact skin. 1/6 animals showed very slight edema (score 1) after 24 h on abraded skin; this effect was fully reversible within 72 h. In this study, TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant.
Study performance does not comply with requirements of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines, where a less vigorous application regime with semi-occlusive dressing, an exposure period of 4 hours, treatment of only intact skin is stipulated. Thus, it can be assumed, that a substance which shows no irritating activity under the application regime of guideline US FHSA Federal regulation: 16 CFR 1500.41 will also be non irritating under the application regimes of the relevant recent EU and OECD guidelines. Therefore the study is adequate for C&L purposes.
In a dermal irritation study in humans, 10 test persons were exposed to TREGDMA in concentrations of 1% and 3% in olive oil for 48 h using the Roc Neodermotest. No skin irritation was observed after 48 h. In this study under the conditions reported, TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant.
In a primary dermal irritation study according to the method of Draize rabbits were dermally exposed to TREGDMA in olive oil at concentrations of 10%, 50% and 100%. Primary dermal irritation indices (PDII) were 0.1, 1.6 and 2.7 – 3.4 for the 10, 50 and 100% groups, respectively.
In this study, TREGDMA is not a dermal irritant.
Eye irritation
In a primary eye irritation study according to OECD guideline 405, adopted 24 February 1987, and EU method B.5, 0.1 mL of TREGDMA (purity ca. 95% according to supplier) was instilled into the conjunctival sac of 3 young adult New Zealand White rabbits (1 male, 2 females) without washing. Animals then were observed for 3 days. Irritation was scored by the method of Draize.
No effects were observed in cornea and iris. Only minimal (grade 1) redness was observed in 1/3 animals 1 h after treatment. All eyes appeared normal at the 24, 48 and 72 h observations.
In this study, TREGDMA is not irritating to the rabbit eye.
Respiratory irritation
No data on the respiratory irritation of TREGDMA are available.
There are no data gaps for the endpoint irritation/corrosion. No human information is available skin irritation with the undiluted test substance and for eye irritation. However, there is no reason to believe that the available results would not be applicable to humans.
Compliance to REACh requirements
The requirements are covered with reliable in vivo data, performed with the substance itself and before in vitro testing became current priority.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, TREGDMA does not need to be classified for eye irritation or skin irritation according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 . Thus, no labelling is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.